Evaluation of effects of pair work on quality of designs

Proceedings of the Australian Software Engineering Conference, ASWEC

Volumn 2005, Issue , 2005, Pages 78-87

  Al Kilidar, Hiyam ^a   Parkin, Peter ^a   Aurum, Aybüke ^a   Jeffery, Ross ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN PHASE; PAIR-DESIGN METHODOLOGY; QUALITY ATTRIBUTES; SOFTWARE LIFECYCLE;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; LIFE CYCLE; PROCESS CONTROL; PRODUCT DESIGN; QUALITY ASSURANCE; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

EID: 33646576865     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ASWEC.2005.24     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (49)

1. D. Galin, Saftware Quality Assurance, From theory to implementation: Pearson education Ltd., 2004.
2. B. Kitchenham and J. Walker, "The Meaning of Quality," presented at Software Engineering, Southampton, England, 1986.
3. B. W. Boehm, "An Experiment in Small-Scale Application Software Engineering," IEEE Transactions. Software Engineering., vol. 7, pp. 482 - 493, 1981.
4. D. Budgen, Software Design. Essex, UK: Pearson Educational Limited, 2003.
5. L. Williams, R. R. Kessler, W. Cunningham, and R. Jeffries, "Strengthening the case for pair programming," IEEE Software, pp. 19 - 25, 2000.
6. L. Williams and R. R. Kessler, "Experimenting with Industry's "Pair Programming" Model in the Computer Science Classroom," Journal on Software Engineering Education, 2000.
7. J. T. Nosek, "The Case for Collaborative Programming," Communications of the ACM, vol. 41, pp. 105 -108, 1998.
8. A. Cockburn and L. Williams, "The costs and benefits of pair programming," in Extreme Programming Examined: Addison Wesley, 2001.
9. L. Williams and R. Kessler, "The effects of "Pair- pressure" and Pair-Learning" on Software engineering Education," presented at Conference of Software Engineering Education and Training, 2000.
10. C. McDowell, L. Werner, H. Bullock, and J. Fernald, "The Impact of Pair Programming on Student Performance, Perception and Persistance," IEEE, 2003.
11. L. Williams and R. R. Kessler, Pair Programming Illuminated: Pearson Education, Inc., 2003.
12. K. Beck, eXtreme Programming explained, Embrace Change: Addison-Wesley, 2000.
13. J. Nawrocki and A. Wojciechowski, "Experimental Evaluation of Pair Programming," presented at European Software Control and Metrics Conference ESCOM 2001, Maastricht, 2001.
14. K. Beck, "Embracing Change with Extreme Programming," IEEE Computer, pp. 70 - 77, 1999.
15. R. Jeffries, "What is Extreme Programming," vol. 2002, 2001.
16. L. Williams, C. McDowell, N. Nagappan, J. Fernald, and L. Werner, "Building Pair Programming Knowledge Through a Family of Experiments," presented at ISESE'2003 (Second International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering), Rome, Italy, 2003.
17. P. Freeman, "Fundamentals of Design," in Tutorial On Software Design Techniques, P. Freeman and A. I. Wasserman, Eds., 4th ed: IEEE Computer society press, 1984.
18. J. C. Jones, Design Methods: Seeds of Human Futures: John Wiley & Sons, 1981.
19. L. Williams and R. R. Kessler, "All I really need to know about Pair Programming I learned in Kindergarten," Communications of the ACM, vol. 43, pp. 108 - 114, 2000.
20. J. C. Munson, Software engineering Measurement: Auerbach Publications, 2003.
21. R. G. Dromey, "A Model for Software Product Quality," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering., vol. 21, pp. 146-162, 1995.
22. D. Wallace and L. Reeker, "Software Quality," in Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge SWEBOK, A. Abram and P. Bourque, Eds.: IEEE, 2001, pp. 165 - 184.
23. ISO/IEC, "14598-5 Information Technology-Software product evaluation, Part 5: Process for evaluators," 1998.
24. C. Ghezzi, M. Jazayeri, and D. Mandrioli, Fundamentals of Software Engineering, 2nd ed: Prentice Hall, 2003.
25. P. Clements, R. Kazman, and M. Klein, Evaluating Software Architectures Methods and Case Studies: Addison-Wesley, 2002.
26. T. DeMarco, Structured Analysis and system Specification. New York, 1979.
27. R. Austin and L. Devin, "Beyond Requirements: Software making as Art," IEEE Software, pp. 93-95, 2003.
28. B. Curtis, H. Krasner, and N. Iscoe, "A field Study Of The Software Design Process For Large Systems," Communications of the ACM, vol. 31, pp. 1268-1287, 1988.
29. P. J. Denning, "What is Software Quality," Communications of the ACM, vol. 35, pp. 13-15, 1992.
30. R. Hall, Applied social research. Sydney: The University of new south Wales, 2003.
31. T. Gilb, "The 10 Most Powerful Principles for Quality in Software and Software Organizations," The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, pp. 4 -8, 2002.
32. C. M. Judd, E. R. Smith, and L. H. Kidder, Research methods in Social Relations (International edition): Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc. The dryden Press, Saunders college publishing, 1991.
33. T. Punter, R. Solingen, and J. Trienekens, "Software Product Evaluation," presented at 4th IT Evaluation Conference (EVIT-97), Netherlands, Delft, 1997.
34. B. Kitchenham and S. L. Pfleeger, "Software Quality: The Elusive Target," IEEE Software, vol. 13, pp. 12 -21, 1996.
35. J. Bansiya and C. David, "A hierarchical Model For Object-Oriented Design Quality," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering., vol. 28, pp. 4-17, 2002.
36. R. Harrison, S. Counsell, and R. Nithi, "An evaluation of MOOD Set of Object-Oriented Software Metrics," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering., vol. 24, pp. 491-496, 1998.
37. H. In, B. W. Boehm, T. Rodgers, and M. Deutsch, "Applying Win-Win to quality requirements: A case study," IEEE, pp. 555-564, 2001.
38. D. Kafura and G. Reddy, "The use of software complexity metrics in software maintenance," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering., vol. 13, pp. 335-343, 1987.
39. K. Rangarajan, N. Swaminathan, V. Hegde, and J. Jacob, "Product Quality Framework: A Vehicle for Focusing on Product Quality Goals," Software Engineering Notes, vol. 26, pp. 77-82, 2001.
40. ISO/IEC, "ISO/IEC 9126-1 Software engineering-Product quality- Part 1: Quality model," 2001.
41. ISO/IEC, "ISO/IEC 9126-3 Software engineering - Product quality- part3: Internal metrics," 2002.
42. ISO/IEC, "ISO/IEC 9126-2 Software engineering - Product quality- part2: External metrics," 2002.
43. ISO/IEC, "ISO/IEC 9126-4 Software engineering - Product quality- part4: Quality In Use metrics," 2002.
44. A. Cockburn, Writing effective Use Cases: Pearson Education Corporate Sales Division, 2001.
45. H. Al-Kilidar, R. Jeffery, A. Aurum, and C. Kutay, "Planning an Empirical Experiment To Evaluate The Effects Of Pair Work On The Design Phase Of The Software Lifecycle," University of New South Wales, Sydney 2003.
46. J. T. Roscoe, Fundamental Research Statistics for Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Edition ed. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston, 1975.
47. R. C. Pfaffenberger and J. H. Patterson, Statistical Methods for Business and Economics, Revised Edition ed. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin Inc., 1981.
48. A. H. Kvanli, C. S. Guynes, and P. R.J., Introduction to Business Statistics: A Computer Integrated Approach, 2nd Edition ed. St. Paul, MN.: West Publishing, 1986.
49. W. F. Tichy, "Hints for Reviewing empirical Work in Software Engineering," Empirical Software Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 909-312, 2000.