Male genital variation in a moth Pammene luedersiana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

European Journal of Entomology

Volumn 104, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 259-265

  Mutanen, Marko ^a   Rytkönen, Seppo ^a   Lindén, Jari ^b   Sinkkonen, Janne ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b NONE   (Finland)

^c NONE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Genital evolution; Genital variation; Genitalia; Geographic variation; Geometric morphometrics; Lepidoptera; Pammene luedersiana; Tortricidae

Indexed keywords

GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; MORPHOLOGY; MOTH; TAXONOMY;

HEXAPODA; LEPIDOPTERA; TORTRICIDAE;

EID: 34248587406     PISSN: 12105759     EISSN: 18028829     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14411/eje.2007.040     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. ADAMS D.C., SLICE D.E. & ROHLF F.J. 2004: Geometric morphometrics: Ten years of progress following the "revolution". Ital J. Zool. 71: 5-16.
2. ARNQVIST G. 1997: The evolution of animal genitalia: distinguishing between hypotheses by single species studies. Biol J. Linn. Soc. 60: 365-379.
3. ARNQVIST G. 1998: Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature 393: 784-786.
4. ARNQVIST G. & MÅRTENSSON T. 1998: Measurement error in geometric morphometrics: Empirical strategies to assess and reduce its impact on measures of shape. Acta Zool. 44: 73-96.
5. ARNQVIST G. & THORNHILL R. 1998: Evolution of animal genitalia: patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation and condition dependence of genital and non-genital morphology in water strider (Heteroptera: Gerridae: Insecta). Genet. Res. 71: 193-212.
6. BERNSTEIN S. & BERNSTEIN R. 2002: Allometry of male genitalia in a species of soldier beetle: Support for the one-size-fits-all hypothesis. Evolution 56: 1707-1710.
7. BOOKSTEIN F.L. 1991: Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data. Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 435 pp.
8. BOOKSTEIN F.L. 1997: Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: Localizing group differences in outline shape. Med. Image Anal. 1: 225-243.
9. DROTZ M.K., SAURA A. & NILSSON A.N. 2001: The species delimitation problem applied to the Agabus bipustulatus complex (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae) in North Scandinavia. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 73: 11-22.
10. DUFOUR L. 1844: Anatomie générale des Diptères. Ann. Sci. Nat. 1: 244-264.
11. EBERHARD W.G. 1985: Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia. Harward University Press, Cambridge, xii + 244 pp.
12. EBERHARD W.G., HUBER B.A., RODRIGUEZ R.L.S., BRICENO R.D., SALAS I. & RODRIGUEZ V. 1998: One size fits all? Relationships between the size and degree of variation in genitalia and other body parts in twenty species of insects and spiders. Evolution 52: 415-431.
13. HOSKEN D.J. & STOCKLEY P. 2004: Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 87-93.
14. HOSKEN D.J., MINDER A.M. & WARD P.I. 2005: Male genital allometry in Scatophagidae (Diptera). Evol. Ecol. 19: 501-515.
15. HOUSE C.M. & SIMMONS L.W. 2003: Genital morphology and fertilization success in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus: An example of sexually selected male genitalia. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. (B) 270: 447-455.
16. ITÄMIES J., & TABELL J. 1997: Variation in male genitalia of Coleophora vacciniella H.-S. (Lepidoptera, Coleophoridae). Entomol. Fenn. 8: 145-150.
17. ITÄMIES J., MUTANEN M. & LANKINEN P. 2003: Revision of the European Aethes rubigana complex with a description of genetically confirmed Aethes kyrkii sp. n. (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). Insect Syst. Evol. 34: 3-14.
18. KAWANO K. 2004: Developmental stability and adaptive variability of male genitalia in sexually dimorphic beetles. Am. Nat. 163: 1-15.
19. KENDALL D.G. 1977: The diffusion of shape. Adv. Appl. Probab. 9: 428-430.
20. KENDALL D.G. 1984: Shape-manifolds, Procrustean metrics and complex projective spaces. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 16: 81-121.
21. KLIMESCH J. 1958: Coleophora betulaenanae n. sp. (Lepidoptera, Coleophoridae). Opusc. Zool. 12: 1-4.
22. MUTANEN M. 2005: Delimitation Aifficulties in species splits: a morphometric case study on the Euxoa tritici complex (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). Syst. Entomol. 30: 632-643.
23. MUTANEN M. & KAITALA A. 2006: Genital variation in a dimorphic moth Selenia tetralunaria (Lepidoptera, Geometridae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 87: 297-307.
24. MUTANEN M., KAITALA A. & MÖNKKÖNEN M. 2006: Genital variation within and between three closely related Euxoa moth species: testing the lock-and-key hypothesis. J. Zool. 268: 109-119.
25. PINTO J.D., VELTEN R.K., PLATNER G.R. & OATMAN E.R. 1989: Phenotypic plasticity and taxonomic characters in Trichogramma (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 82: 414-425.
26. QUERINO R.B. & ZUCCHI R.A. 2002: Intraspecific variation in Trichogramma bruni Nagaraja, 1983 (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) associated with different hosts. Braz. J. Biol. 62: 665-679.
27. RAZOWSKI J. 2001: Die Tortriciden (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) Mitteleuropas. F. Slamka, Bratislava, 319 pp.
28. ROHLF F.J. 2003: TpsRelw, Version 1.35. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook. Available at http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/
29. ROHLF F.J. 2004a: TpsDig, Version 1.40. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook. Available at http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/
30. ROHLF F.J. 2004b: TpsUtil, Version 1.26. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook. Available at http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/
31. ROHLF F.J. & MARCUS L.F. 1993: A revolution in morphometrics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 129-132.
32. ROHLF F.J. & SLICE D.E. 1990: Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst. Zool. 39: 40-59.
33. SCHMITZ G., REINHOLD K. & WAGNER P. 2000: Allometric relationship between genital size and body size in two species of mordellid beetles (Coleoptera: Mordellidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93: 637-639.
34. SCOBLE M.J. 1995: The Lepidoptera: Form, Function and Diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 404 pp.
35. SHAPIRO A.M. & PORTER A.H. 1989: The lock-and-key hypothesis: evolutionary and biosystematic interpretation of insect genitalia. Annu, Rev. Entomol. 34: 231-245.
36. TATSUTA H., MIZOTA K. & AKIMOTO S.I. 2001: Allometric patterns of heads and genitalia in the stag beetle Lucanus maculifemoratus (Coleoptera: Lucanidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 94: 462-466.
37. TEDER T. 1998: Limited variability of genitalia in the genus Pimpla II (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae): inter- or intraspecific causes? Neth. J. Zool. 48: 335-347.
38. UHL G. & VOLRATH F. 2000: Extreme body size variability in the golden silk spider (Nephila edulis) does not extent to the genitalia. J. Zool. 251: 7-14.
39. WITZGALL P., CHAMBON J.-P., BENGTSSON M., UNELIUS C.R., APPELGREN M., MAKRANCZY G., MURALEEDHARAN N., REED D.W., HELLRIGL K., BUSER H.-R., HALLBERG E., BERGSTRÖM G., TÖTH M., LÖFSTED C. & LÖFQVIST J. 1996: Sex pheromones and attractants in the Eucosmini and Grapholitini (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). Chemoecology 7: 13-23.
40. YEZERINAC S.M., LOUGHEED S.C. & HANDFORD P. 1992: Measurement error and morphometric studies: Statistical power and observer experience. Syst. Biol. 41: 471-482.
41. ZELDITCH M.L., SWIDERSKI D.L., SHEETS H.D. & FINK W.L. 2004: Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. Elsevier Academic Press, New York, 443 pp.