What benefits can viticulture possibly expect from genomics?;Quels bénéfices la génomique peut-elle apporter à la viticulture?

Cahiers/Agricultures

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 87-92

  Adam Blondon, Anne Françoise ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Genetics; Genomes; Plant physiology; Vitis vinifera

Indexed keywords

VITACEAE; VITIS; VITIS VINIFERA;

EID: 34248573830     PISSN: 11667699     EISSN: 17775949     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1684/agr.2007.0078     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Adam-Blondon A-F, Bernole A, Faes G, et al. Construction and characterization of BAC libraries from major grapevine cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 2005 ; 110 : 1363-71.
2. Adam-Blondon A-F, Roux C, Claux D, Butterlin G, Merdinoglu D, This P. Mapping 245 SSR markers on the Vitis vinifera genome : a tool for grape genetics. Theor Appl Genet 2004 ; 109 : 1017-27.
3. Barker CL, Donald T, Pauquet J, et al. Genetic and physical mapping of the grapevine powdery mildew resistance gene, Run 1, using a bacterial artificial chromosome library. Theor Appl Genet 2005 ; 111 : 370-7.
4. Barnaud A, Lacombe T, Doligez A. Linkage disequilibrium in cultivated grapevine, V. vinifera L. Theor Appl Genet 2006 ; 112 : 708-16.
5. Bisson LF, Waterhouse AL, Ebeler SE, Walker MA, Lapsley JT. The present and future of the international wine industry. Nature 2002 ; 418 : 696-9.
6. Bos JIB, Armstrong M, Whisson SC, et al. Intraspecific comparative geneomics to identify avirulence genes from Phytophthora. New Phytol 2003 ; 159 : 63-72.
7. Boss PK, Thomas MR. Association of dwarfism and floral induction with a grape 'green revolution' mutation. Nature 2002 ; 416 : 847-9.
8. Castellarin SD, Di Gaspero G, Marconi R, et al. Colour variation in red grapevines. Vitis vinifera L. : genomic organisation, expression of flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase, flavonoid 3′,5′-hydroxylase genes and related metabolite profiling of red cyaniditv/blue delphinidin-based anthocyanins in berry skin. BMC Genomics 2006 ; 7 : 12.
9. Cramer GR, Cushman JC, Shooley DA, et al. Progress in bioinformatics-the challenge of integrating transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic information. Acta Hortic 2004 ; 689 : 417-23.
10. Doligez A, Bouquet A, Danglot Y, et al. Genetic mapping of grapevine. Vitis vinifera L. ; applied to the detection of QTLs for seedlessness and berry weight. Theor Appl Genet 2002 ; 105 : 780-95.
11. Donald TM, Pellerone F, Adam-Blondon A-F, Bouquet A, Thomas MR, Dry IB. Identification of resistance gene analogs linked to a powdery mildew resistance locus in grapevine. Theor Appl Genet 2002 ; 104 : 610-8.
12. Fernandez L, Romieu C, Moing A, et al. The Grapevine fleshless berry Mutation. A Unique Genotype to Investigate Differences between Fleshy and Nonfleshy Fruit. Plant Physiol 2006 ; 140 : 537-47.
13. Fischer B, Salakhutdinov I, Akkurt M, et al. Quantitative trait locus analysis of fungal disease resistance factor on a molecular map of grapevine. Theor Appl Genet 2004 ; 108 : 501-15.
14. Goes da Silva F, landolino A, Al-Kayal F, et al. Characterizing the grape transcriptome. Analysis of expressed sequence tags from multiple Vitis species and development of a compendium of gene expression during berry development. Plant Physiol 2005 ; 139 : 574-97.
15. Hammond-Kosack KE, Parker JE. Deciphering plant-pathogen communication : fresh perspectives for molecular resistance breeding. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2003 ; 14 : 177-93.
16. Huitema E, Bos JIB, Tian M, Win J, Waugh ME, Kamoun S. Linking sequence to phenotype in Phytophthora-plant interactions. Trends Microbiol 2004 ; 12 : 194-200.
17. Lodhi MA, Daly MJ, Ye GN, Weeden NF, Reisch Bl. A molecular marker based linkage map of Vitis. Genome 1995 ; 38 : 786-94.
18. Morgante M, Salamini F. From plant genomics to breeding practice. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2003 ; 14 : 214-9.
19. Mullins MG, Bouquet A, Williams LE. Biology of grapevine. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1992.
20. Newman KL, Almeida RPP, Purcell AH, Lindow SE. Cell-cell signaling controls Xyllela fastidiosa interactions with both insects and plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004 ; 101 : 1737-42.
21. Pereira GE, Gaudillere J-P, van Leeuven C, et al. 1H NMR and chemometrics to characterize mature grape berries in four wine-growing areas in Bordeaux-France. J Agric Food Chem 2005 ; 53 : 6382-9.
22. Pühler A, Arlat M, Becker A, Göttfert M, Morrissey JP, O'Gara F. What can bacterial genome research teach us about bacteria-plant interactions? Curr Opin Plant Biol 2004 ; 7 : 137-47.
23. Riaz S, Dangl GS, Edwards KJ, Meredith CJ. A microsatellite marker based framework linkage map of Vitis vinifera L. Theor Appl Genet 2004 ; 108 : 864-72.
24. Stitt M, Fernie AR. From measurements of metabolites to metabolomics : an "on the fly" perspective illustrated by recent studies of carbon-nitrogen interactions. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2003 ; 14 : 136-44.
25. Terrier N, Glissant D, Grimplet J, et al. Isogene specific oligo arrays reveal multifaceted changes in gene expression during grape berry. Vitis vinifera L. ; development. Planta 2005 ; 6 : 1-16.
26. Varshney RK, Graner A, Sorrells ME. Genomics-assisted breeding for crop improvement. Trends Plant Sci 2005 ; 10 : 621-30.
27. Velasco R, Grando M-S, Troggio M, et al. Integrated physical and genetic mapping in grapevine V. vinifera L. 2005. http://www.intl-pag.org/pag/13/ abstracts/PAG13_W179.html.
28. Xing T, Ovellet T, Miki BL. Towards genomic and proteomic studies of protein phosphorylation in plant-pathogen interactions. Trends Plant Sci 2002 ; 7 : 224-30.
29. Yin X, Struik PC, Kropff MJ. Role of crop physiology in predicting gene-to-phenotype relationships. Trends Plant Sci 2004 ; 9 : 427-32.
30. Yoder OC, Turgeon BG. Fungal genomics and pathogenicity. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2001 ; 4 : 315-21.