Clauses in noncanonical positions at the syntax-phonology interface

Syntax

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 38-79

  An, Duk Ho ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248366946     PISSN: 13680005     EISSN: 14679612     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9612.2007.00096.x     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. ABELS, K. 2003. Successive cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
2. AGBAYANI, B. 2000. Wh -subjects in English and the vacuous movement hypothesis. Linguistic Inquiry 31:703-713.
3. AN, D. 2004. Intonational phrasing and its consequences on vacuous movement. In: Minimalist views on interfaces: Proceedings of the 6th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar, ed. R. KIM, 21-36. Seoul: Hankook.
4. BIANCHI, V. 2000. The raising analysis of relative clauses: A reply to Borsley. Linguistic Inquiry 31:123-140.
5. BICKMORE, L. 1990. Branching nodes and prosodic categories: Evidence from Kinyambo. In The phonology-syntax connection, ed. S. INKELAS & D. ZEC, 1-17. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
6. BOBALJIK, J. 1994. What does adjacency do? In The morphology-syntax connection: MIT working papers in linguistics 22, ed. H. HARLEY & C. PHILIPS, 1-32. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
7. BOBALJIK, J. 1995. Morphosyntax: The syntax of verbal inflection. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
8. BOECKX, C. 2003. Islands and chains: Resumption as stranding. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
9. BošKović, Ž. 1994. Categorial status of null operator relatives and finite declarative complements. Language Research 30:387-417.
10. BošKović, Ž. 1997. The syntax of nonfinite complementation: An economy approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Bošković, Ž. 2000. Sometimes in [Spec, CP], sometimes in situ. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. R. MARTIN, D. MICHAELS & J. URIAGEREKA, 53-87. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. BOŠKOVIĆ, Ž. 2001. On the nature of the syntax-phonology interface: Cliticization and related phenomena. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
13. Bošković, Ž. 2004. Two notes on right node raising. In University of Connecticut working papers in linguistics 12, ed. Miguel Rodríguez-Mondoñedo & M. Emma Ticio, 13-24. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
14. Bošković, Ž. 2005. On the locality of Move and Agree: University of Connecticut occasional papers in linguistics 3. ed. S. Herdan & M. Rodríguez-Mondoñedo. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
15. Bošković, Ž. & H. LASNIK 1999. How strict is the cycle? Linguistic Inquiry 30:691-703.
16. Bošković, Ž. & H. LASNIK 2003. On the distribution of null complementizers. Linguistic Inquiry 34:527-546.
17. BROWNE, W. 1975. Notes on clauses as subjects. In Contrastive analysis of English and Serbo-Croatian 1, ed. R. Filipović, 143-145. Institute of Linguistics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Zagreb.
18. ĆAVAR, D. & C. WILDER 1993. Verbal and pronominal clitics in Croatian. Paper presented at the Geneva Workshop on the Wackernagel Position.
19. CHEN, M. 1987. The syntax of Xiamen tone sandhi. Phonology Yearbook 4:109-149.
20. CHEN, M. 1990. What must phonology know about syntax? In The phonology-syntax connection, ed. S. Inkelas & D. Zec, 19-46. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. CHENG, L. 1991. On the typology of wh -questions. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
22. CHO, Y.-M. Y. 1990. Syntax and phrasing in Korean. In The phonology-syntax connection, ed. S. Inkelas & D. Zec, 47-62. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. CHOMSKY, N. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
24. CHOMSKY, N. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. CHOMSKY, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. CHOMSKY, N. 2000. Minimalist inquiries. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka, 53-87. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. CHOMSKY, N. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. M. Kenstowicz, 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. CHOMSKY, N. & H. LASNIK 1993. The theory of principles and parameters. In Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research: Vol. 1, ed. J. JACOBS, A. VON STECHOW, W. STERNEFELD & T. VENNEMANN, 506-509. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
29. CHUNG, S., W. LADUSAW & J. MCCLOSKEY 1995. Sluicing and logical form. Natural Language Semantics 3:1-44.
30. DOHERTY, C. 1997. Clauses without complementizers: Finite IP-complementation in English. The Linguistic Review 14: 197-220.
31. FOX, D. & H. LASNIK 2003. Successive-cyclic movement and island repair: The difference between sluicing and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 34:143-154.
32. FOX, D. & D. PESETSKY 2005. Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure. Theoretical Linguistics 31:1-45.
33. FRANKS, S. 1998. Parameters of Slavic morphosyntax revisited: A minimalist retrospective. In Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics: The Connecticut meeting, 1997, ed. Ž. Bošković, S. Franks & W. Snyder, 134-165. Ann Arbor.: Michigan Slavic Publications.
34. FRANKS, S. n.d. A PF-insertion analysis of that. Ms., Indiana University, Bloomington.
35. FRANKS, S. & Ž. BOŠKOVIĆ 2001. An argument for multiple Spell-Out. Linguistic Inquiry 32:174-183.
36. GEORGE, L. 1980. Analogical generalization in natural language syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
37. GRIMSHAW, J. 1997. Projection, heads, and optimality. Linguistic Inquiry 28:373-422.
38. GROHMANN, K. 2001. Clausal tripartition, anti-locality and preliminary considerations of a formal approach to clause types. In ZAS papers in linguistics 24, ed. K. Von Heusinger & K. Schwabe, 103-123. Zentrum für allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft (ZAS), Berlin.
39. GUIMARÃES, M. 1998. PF reflexes of phase boundaries. Contribution to minimalist issues chat room, University of Maryland, College Park.
40. HALE, K. & E. SELKIRK 1987. Government and tonal phrasing in Papago. Phonology Yearbook 4:151-183.
41. HALPERN, A. 1992. Topics in the placement and morphology of clitics. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, CA.
42. HUANG, C.-T. J. 1993. Reconstruction and the structure of VP: Some theoretical consequences. Linguistic Inquiry 24:103-138.
43. INKELAS, S. 1989. Prosodic constituency in the lexicon. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, CA.
44. JOHNSON, K. 1991. Object positions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 9:577-636.
45. JOHNSON, K. 1994. Bridging the gap. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
46. KAYNE, R. 1994. The antisymmetry in syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. KOOPMAN, H. 1983. ECP effects in main clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 14:346-350.
48. LASNIK, H. 1981. Restricting the theory of transformations: A case study. In Explanation in linguistics, ed. N. Hornstein and D. Lightfoot, 152-173. London: Longmans. [Reprinted in Essays on restrictiveness and learnablity, H. Lasnik, 125-145. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1990.].
49. LASNIK, H. 1993. Lectures on minimalist syntax. University of Connecticut occasional papers in linguistics 1. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL. [Reprinted in Lasnik 1999:25-73.].
50. LASNIK, H. 1995. Last resort. In Minimalism and linguistic theory, ed. S. Haraguchi & M. Funaki, 1-32. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing. [Reprinted in Lasnik 1999:120-146.].
51. LASNIK, H. 1999. Minimalist analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
52. LASNIK, H. 2001. When can you save a structure by destroying it? In Proceedings of NELS 31, ed. M. Kim & U. Strauss, 301-320. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
53. LASNIK, H. & M. SAITO 1984. On the nature of proper government. Linguistic Inquiry 15:235-290.
54. LASNIK, H. & M. SAITO 1991. On the subject of infinitives. In Papers from the 27th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. L. Dobrin, L. Nichols & R. Rodriguez, 324-343. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. [Reprinted in Lasnik 1999:7-24.].
55. LASNIK, H. & M. SAITO 1992. Move α: Conditions on its application and output. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56. LEGATE, J. 2003. Some interface properties of the phase. Linguistic Inquiry 34:506-516.
57. MARTIN, R. 1996. A minimalist theory of PRO and control. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
58. MARTIN, R. 2001. Null Case and the distribution of PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 32:141-166.
59. MCCLOSKEY, J. 2000. Quantifier float and wh-movement in an Irish English. Linguistic Inquiry 31:57-84.
60. MERCHANT, J. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61. NESPOR, M. & I. VOGEL 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
62. PESETSKY, D. 1992. Zero syntax: Vol 2. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
63. PESETSKY, D. & E. TORREGO 2001. T-to-C movement: Causes and consequences. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. M. Kenstowicz, 355-426. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64. POSTAL, P. 1974. On raising: One rule of English grammar and its theoretical implications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
65. PROGOVAC, L. 1996. Clitics in Serbian/Croatian: Comp as the second position. In Approaching second: Second position clitics and related phenomena, ed. A. HALPERN & A. ZWICKY, 411-428. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
66. QUIRK, R., S. GREENBAUM, G. LEECH & J. SVARTVIK 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
67. RADANOVIĆ-KOCIĆ, V. 1988. The grammar of Serbo-Croatian clitics: A synchronic and diachronic perspective. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
68. RADANOVIĆ-KOCIĆ, V. 1996. Placement of Serbo-Croatian clitics: A prosodic approach. In Approaching second: Second position clitics and related phenomena, ed. A. Halpern & A. Zwicky, 429-445. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
69. RICHARDS, N. 1999. Complementizer cliticization in Tagalog and English. In Proceedings of the 6th meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association: Toronto working papers in linguistics 16.2, ed. C. Smallwood & C. Kitto, 297-312. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto.
70. RIZZI, L. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
71. RIZZI, L. 1996. Residual verb second and the wh -criterion. In Parameters and functional heads: Essays in comparative syntax, ed. A. Belletti & L. Rizzi, pp. 63-90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
72. ROSS, J. R. 1969. Guess who? In Papers from the 5th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. R. I Binnick, A. Davison, G. M. Green & J. L. Morgan, 252-286. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
73. SAITO, M. 1986. Three notes on syntactic movement in Japanese. In Issues in Japanese linguistics, ed. T. Imai & M. Saito, 301-350. Dordrecht: Foris.
74. SAITO, M. & K. MURASUGI 1999. Subject predication within IP and DP. In Beyond principles and parameters, ed. K. Johnson & I. Roberts, 167-188. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
75. SAUERLAND, U. & P. ELBOURNE 2002. Total reconstruction, PF-movement, and derivational order. Linguistic Inquiry 33:283-319.
76. SCHÜTZE, C. 1994. Serbo-Croatian second position clitic placement and the phonology-syntax interface. In Papers on phonology and morphology: MIT working papers in linguistics 21, ed. A. Carnie, H. Harley & T. Bures, 373-473. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
77. SELKIRK, E. 1978. On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure. Paper presented at the Conference on Mental Representation in Phonology, [Reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1980].
78. SELKIRK, E. 1984. Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
79. SELKIRK, E. 1986. On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3:371-405.
80. STJEPANOVIĆ, S. 1999. What do second position cliticization, scrambling, and multiple wh-fronting have in common? Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
81. STOWELL, T. 1981. Origins of phrase structure. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
82. TAKANO, Y. 2000. Illicit remnant movement: An argument for feature-driven movement. Linguistic Inquiry 31:141-156.
83. TRUCKENBRODT, H. 1995. Phonological phrases: Their relation to syntax, focus, and prominence. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
84. TRUCKENBRODT, H. 1999. Syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 30:219-255.
85. URIAGEREKA, J. 1999. Multiple Spell-Out. In Working minimalism, ed. S. D. Epstein & N. Hornstein, 251-282. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
86. WEBELHUTH, G. 1989. Syntactic saturation phenomena and the modern Germanic languages. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
87. WEXLER, K. & P. CULICOVER 1980. Formal principles of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
88. WILDER, C. & D. ĆAVAR 1994. Long head movement? Verb movement and cliticization in Croatian. Lingua 93:1-58.
89. WURMBRAND, S. 2001. Agree: The other VP-internal subject hypothesis. In Proceedings of WCCFL 20, ed. K. Megerdoomian & L. A. Barel, 635-648. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
90. ZEC, D. & INKELAS S. 1990. Prosodically constrained syntax. In Phonology-syntax connection, ed. S. Inkelas & D. Zec, 365-378. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.