Erector spinae muscle changes on magnetic resonance imaging following lumbar surgery through a posterior approach

Spine

Volumn 32, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1236-1241

  Gille, Olivier ^a   Jolivet, Erwan ^a   Dousset, Vincent ^a   Degrise, Cécile ^a   Obeid, Ibrahim ^a   Vital, Jean Marc ^a   Skalli, Wafa ^a,b  

^a BORDEAUX UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b LABORATOIRE DE BIOMÉCANIQUE   (France)

Author keywords

Contractile component; Cross sectional area muscle; Lumbar surgery; MRI; Trunk muscles

Indexed keywords

ATRACURIUM; CHOLINERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; PROPOFOL; SUFENTANIL; TOFGARD; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHOLINERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERECTOR SPINAE MUSCLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; MUSCLE; MUSCLE CONTRACTILITY; MUSCLE INJURY; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PEDICLE SCREW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZATION; SPINE FUSION;

ADULT; BACK INJURIES; CURARE; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; NEUROMUSCULAR NONDEPOLARIZING AGENTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34248365637     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31805471fe     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery: a histologic and enzymatic analysis. Spine 1996;21:941-4.
2. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery: 2. Histologic and histochemical analyses in humans. Spine 1994;19:2598-602.
3. Taylor H, McGregor AH, Medhi-Zadeh S, et al. The impact of self-retaining retractors on the paraspinal muscles during posterior spinal surgery. Spine 2002;27:2758-62.
4. Weber BR, Grob D, Dvorak J, et al. Posterior surgical approach to the lumbar spine and its effect on the multifidus muscle. Spine 1997;22:1765-72.
5. Flicker PL, Fleckenstein JL, Ferry K, et al. Lumbar muscle usage in chronic low back pain: magnetic resonance image evaluation. Spine 1993;18:582-6.
6. Gejo R, Matsui H, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery. Spine 1999;24:1023-8.
7. Kim DY, Lee SH, Chung SK, et al. Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation. Spine 2005;30:123-9.
8. Humphrey AR, Nargol AV, Jones AP, et al. The value of electromyography of the lumbar paraspinal muscles in discriminating between chronic-low-back-pain sufferers and normal subjects. Eur Spine J 2005;14:175-84.
9. Money V, Gulick J, Perlman M, et al. Relationships between myoelectric activity, strength, and MRI of lumbar extensor muscles in back pain patients and normal subjects. J Spinal Disord 1997;10:348-56.
10. Peltonen JE, Taimela S, Erkintalo M, et al. Back extensor and psoas muscle cross-sectional area, prior physical training, and trunk muscle strength: a longitudinal study in adolescent girls. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1998;77:66-71.
11. Hultman G, Nordin M, Saraste H, et al. Body composition, endurance, strength, cross-sectional area, and density of MM erector spinae in men with and without low back pain. J Spinal Disord 1993;6:114-23.
12. Storheim K, Holm I, Gunderson R, et al. The effect of comprehensive group training on cross-sectional area, density, and strength of paraspinal muscles in patients sick-listed for subacute low back pain. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:271-9.
13. Danneels LA, Vanderstraeten GG, Cambier DC, et al. CT imaging of trunk muscles in chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects. Eur Spine J 2000;9:266-72.
14. Keller A, Gunderson R, Reikeras O, et al. Reliability of computed tomography measurements of paraspinal muscle cross-sectional area and density in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 2003;28:1455-60.
15. Mayer TG, Vanharanta H, Gatchel RJ, et al. Comparison of CT scan muscle measurements and isokinetic trunk strength in postoperative patients. Spine 1989;14:33-6.
16. Barker KL, Shamley DR, Jackson D. Changes in the cross-sectional area of multifidus and psoas in patients with unilateral back pain: the relationship to pain and disability. Spine 2004;29:E515-9.
17. Parkkola R, Rytokoski U, Kormano M. Magnetic resonance imaging of the discs and trunk muscles in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy control subjects. Spine 1993;18:830-6.
18. Dangaria TR, Naesh O. Changes in cross-sectional area of psoas major muscle in unilateral sciatica caused by disc herniation. Spine 1998;23:928-31.
19. Savage RA, Millerchip R, Whitehouse GH, et al. Lumbar muscularity and its relationship with age, occupation and low back pain. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1991;63:265-8.
20. Airaksinen O, Herno A, Kaukanen E, et al. Density of lumbar muscles 4 years after decompressive spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 1996;5:193-7.
21. Salminen JJ, Erkintalo-Tertti MO, Paajanen HE. Magnetic resonance imaging findings of lumbar spine in the young: correlation with leisure time physical activity, spinal mobility, and trunk muscle strength in 15-year-old pupils with or without low-back pain. J Spinal Disord 1993;6:386-91.
22. Holmback AM, Askaner K, Holtas S, et al. Assessment of contractile and noncontractile components in human skeletal muscle by magnetic resonance imaging. Muscle Nerve 2002;25:251-8.
23. Kent-Braun JA, Ng AV, Young K. Skeletal muscle contractile and noncontractile components in young and older women and men. J Appl Physiol 2000;88:662-8.
24. Gille O, Obeid I, Degrise C, et al. The use of curare during anesthesia to prevent iatrogenic muscle damage caused by lumbar spinal surgery through a posterior approach. Spine 2007;32:402-5.
25. Laxenaire MC. Neuromuscular blocking drugs and allergic risk. Can J Anaesth 2003;50:429-33.
26. Swinhoe CF, Peacock JE, Reilly CS. Evaluation of the predictive performance of target-controlled infusion system for the administration of propofol. Br J Anaesth 1995;74(suppl 1):276.
27. Loan PB, Paxton LD, Mirakhur RK, et al. The TOF-Guard neuromuscular transmission monitor: a comparison with the Myograph 2000. Anaesthesia 1995;50:699-702.
28. Billard V, Constant I. Automatic analysis of electroencephalogram: what is its value in the year 2000 for monitoring anesthesia depth. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2001;20:763-85.
29. Paturet G. Treaty of Human Anatomy, Tome 1. Osteology, Arthrology and Myology. Paris: Masson; 1951.
30. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery: 1. Histologic and histochemical analysis in rats. Spine 1994;19:2590-7.
31. Ogata K, Whiteside LA. Effects of external compression on blood flow to muscle and skin. Clin Orthop 1982;168:105-7.