The use of curare during anesthesia to prevent iatrogenic muscle damage caused by lumbar spinal surgery through a posterior approach

Spine

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 402-405

  Gille, Olivier ^a   Obeid, Ibrahim ^a   Degrise, Cecile ^a   Guerin, Patrick ^a   Skalli, Wafa ^a   Vital, Jean Marc ^a  

^a BORDEAUX UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Creatine phosphokinase; Curare; Intramuscular pressure; Multifidus

Indexed keywords

CREATINE KINASE; CURARE; ISOENZYME; MM ISOENZYME; MORPHINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA; ARTHRODESIS; ARTICLE; CHOLINERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; DRUG USE; ERECTOR SPINAE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IATROGENIC DISEASE; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; MULTIFIDUS; MUSCLE BIOPSY; MUSCLE INJURY; PEDICLE SCREW; POSTERIOR APPROACH; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RETRACTOR; SKELETAL MUSCLE; SPINE SURGERY; SURGICAL APPROACH; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; CREATINE KINASE; CURARE; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; IATROGENIC DISEASE; ISOENZYMES; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; NEUROMUSCULAR NONDEPOLARIZING AGENTS; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROPOFOL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

EID: 33847033239     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000255077.54766.59     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Airaksinen O, Herno A, Kaukanen E, et al. Density of lumbar muscles 4 years after decompressive spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 1996;5:193-7.
2. Barker KL, Shamley DR, Jackson D. Changes in the cross-sectional area of multifidus and psoas in patients with unilateral back pain: the relationship to pain and disability. Spine 2004;29:E515-9.
3. Hultman G, Nordin M, Saraste H, et al. Body composition, endurance, strength, cross-sectional area, and density of MM erector spinae in men with and without low back pain. J Spinal Disord 1993;6:114-23.
4. Parkkola R, Rytokoski U, Kormano M. Magnetic resonance imaging of the discs and trunk muscles in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy control subjects. Spine 1993;18:830-6.
5. Salminen JJ, Erkintalo-Tertti MO, Paajanen HE. Magnetic resonance imaging findings of lumbar spine in the young: correlation with leisure time physical activity, spinal mobility, and trunk muscle strength in 15-year-old pupils with or without low-back pain. J Spinal Disord 1993;6:386-91.
6. Gejo R, Matsui H, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery. Spine 1999;24:1023-8.
7. Mayer TG, Vanharanta H, Gatchel RJ, et al. Comparison of CT scan muscle measurements and isokinetic trunk strength in postoperative patients. Spine 1989;14:33-6.
8. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery: a histologic and enzymatic analysis. Spine 1996;21:941-4.
9. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery: Part 1. Histologic and histochemical analysis in rats. Spine 1994;19:2590-7.
10. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery: Part 2. Histologic and histochemical analyses in humans. Spine 1994;19:2598-602.
11. Taylor H, McGregor AH, Medhi-Zadeh S, et al. The impact of self-retaining retractors on the paraspinal muscles during posterior spinal surgery. Spine 2002;27:2758-62.
12. Weber BR, Grob D, Dvorak J, et al. Posterior surgical approach to the lumbar spine and its effect on the multifidus muscle. Spine 1997;22:1765-72.
13. Gejo R, Kawaguchi Y, Kondoh T, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and histologic evidence of postoperative back muscle injury in rats. Spine 2000;25:941-6.
14. Kim DY, Lee SH, Chung SK, et al. Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation. Spine 2005;30:123-9.
15. Styf JR, Willen J. The effects of external compression by three different retractors on pressure in the erector spine muscles during and after posterior lumbar spine surgery in humans. Spine 1998;23:354-8.
16. Kawaguchi Y, Yabuki S, Styf J, et al. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery: topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery. Spine 1996;21:2683-8.
17. Laxenaire MC. Neuromuscular blocking drugs and allergic risk. Can J Anaesth 2003;50:429-33.
18. Swinhoe CF, Peacock JE, Reilly CS. Evaluation of the predictive performance of target-controlled infusion system for the administration of propofol. Br J Anaesth 1995;74(suppl 1):A276.
19. Loan PB, Paxton LD, Mirakhur RK, et al. The TOF-Guard neuromuscular transmission monitor: a comparison with the Myograph 2000. Anaesthesia 1995;50:699-702.
20. Billard V, Constant I. Automatic analysis of electroencephalogram: what is its value in the year 2000 for monitoring anesthesia depth? Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2001;20:763-85.
21. Datta G, Gnanalingham KK, Peterson D, et al. Back pain and disability after lumbar laminectomy: is there a relationship to muscle retraction? Neurosurgery 2004;54:1413-20; discussion 1420.
22. Tsung SH. Creatine kinase isoenzyme patterns in human tissue obtained at surgery. Clin Chem 1976;22:173-5.
23. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Changes in serum creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme after lumbar spine surgery. Spine 1997;22:1018-23.
24. Ogata K, Whiteside LA. Effects of external compression on blood flow to muscle and skin. Clin Orthop 1982;168:105-7.
25. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Gejo R, et al. Preventive measures of back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery in rats. Spine 1998;23:2282-7.