Tool use and related errors in ideational apraxia: The quantitative simulation of patient error profiles

Cortex

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 319-337

  Cooper, Richard P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action selection errors; Cognitive modelling; Ideational apraxia; Interactive activation network

Indexed keywords

APRAXIA; ARTICLE; BRAIN DAMAGE; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COGNITION; ERROR; HUMAN; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; OBJECT MANIPULATION; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; SIMULATION;

EID: 34248353797     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 00109452     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70458-1     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. ARBIB MA. Modeling visuomotor transformations. In Jeannerod M and Grafman J (Eds), Handbook of Neuropsychology(vol. 11): Action and Cognition. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1997.
2. BOCCARDI E, DELLA SALLA S, MOTTO C and SPINNLER H. Utilisation behaviour consequent to bilateral SMA softening. Cortex, 38: 289-308, 2002.
3. BOTVINICK M and PLAUT DC. Doing without schema hierarchies: A recurrent connectionist approach to normal and impaired routine sequential action. Psychological Review, 111: 395-429, 2004.
4. BUXBAUM LJ, SCHWARTZ MF and MONTGOMERY MW. Ideational apraxia and naturalistic action. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15: 617-643, 1998.
5. COOPER RP, SCHWARTZ MF, YULE P and SHALLICE T. The simulation of action disorganisation in complex activities of daily living. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22: 959-1004, 2005.
6. COOPER RP and SHALLICE T. Contention scheduling and the control of routine activities. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17: 297-338, 2000.
7. COOPER RP and SHALLICE T. Hierarchical schemas and goals in the control of sequential behaviour. Psychological Review, 113: 887-916, 2006.
8. DELLA SALA S, MARCHETTI C and SPINNLER H. Right-sided anarchic (alien) hand: A longitudinal study. Neuropsychologia, 29: 1113-1127, 1991.
9. DE RENZI E and LUCCHELLI F. Ideational apraxia. Brain, 111: 1173-1185, 1988.
10. DUNCAN J. Selective attention and the organisation of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113: 501-517, 1984.
11. DUNCAN J. Disorganization of behaviour after frontal lobe damage. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3: 271-290, 1986.
12. FORDE EM and HUMPHREYS GW. Dissociations in routine behaviour across patients and everyday tasks. Neurocase, 8: 151-167, 2002.
13. FUSTER JM. The Prefrontal Cortex. New York: Raven Press, 1989.
14. GIBSON JJ. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979.
15. GIOVANNETTI T, LIBON DJ, BUXBAUM LJ and SCHWARTZ MF. Naturalistic action impairments in dementia. Neuropsychologia, 40 1220-12321, 2002.
16. GOLDBERG G, MAYER NH and TOGLIA JU. Medial frontal cortex infarction and the alien hand sign. Archives of Neurology, 38: 683-686, 1981.
17. GRAFMAN J. Plans, actions, and mental sets: Managerial knowledge units in the frontal lobes. In Perecman E (Ed), Integrating Theory and Practice in Neuropsychology. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1989.
18. GRAFMAN J. Similarities and distinctions among current models of prefrontal cortical functions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 769: 337-368, 1995.
19. HARTMANN K, GOLDENBERG G, DAUMOLLER M and HERMSDÖRFER J. It takes the whole brain to make a cup of coffee: The neuropsychology of naturalistic actions involving technical devices. Neuropsychologia, 43 625-637, 2005.
20. HUMPHREYS GW and FORDE EM. Disordered action schema and action disorganisation syndrome. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15: 771-811, 1998.
21. HUMPHREYS GW and RIDDOCH MJ. From vision to action and action to vision: A convergent route approach to vision, action, and attention. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 42: 225-264, 2003.
22. LAND M, MENNIE N and RUSTED J. The roles of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of daily living. Perception, 28: 1311-1328, 1999.
23. LHERMITTE F. Utilisation behaviour and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain, 106: 237-255, 1983.
24. LIEPMANN H. Apraxie. Ergebnisse der Gesamten Medizin, 1: 516-543, 1920.
25. LURIA AR. Higher Cortical Functions in Man. London: Tavistock, 1966.
26. MACKAY DG. A theory of the representation, organisation and timing of action with implications for sequencing disorders. In Roy EA (Ed), Neuropsychological Studies of Apraxia and Related Disorders. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1985.
27. MAES P. How to do the right thing. Connection Science, 1: 291-323, 1989.
28. MILLER GA, GALANTER E and PRIBRAM KH. Plans and the Structure of Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1960.
29. NORMAN DA. Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88: 1-15, 1981.
30. NORMAN DA and SHALLICE T. Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behaviour. Chip report 99, University of California, San Diego, 1980.
31. NORMAN DA and SHALLICE T. Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. In Davidson R, Schwartz G and Shapiro D (Eds), Consciousness and Self Regulation, (vol. 4). New York: Plenum, 1986.
32. PICK A. Studien uber Motorische Apraxie und ihr Nahestehende Erscheinungen; ihre Bedeutung in der Symptomatologie Psychoopathischer Symptomen-Komplexe. Leipzig: Deiticke, 1905.
33. REASON JT. Actions not as planned: The price of automatization. In Underwood G and Stevens R (Eds), Aspects of Consciousness. London: Academic Press, 1979.
34. RUMIATI RI and HUMPHREYS GW. Recognition by action: Dissociating visual and semantic routes to actions in normal observers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24: 631-647, 1998.
35. RUMIATI RI, WEISS PH, SHALLICE T, OTROBONI G, NOTH J, ZILLES K and FINK GR. Neural basis of pantomiming the use of visually presented objects. NeuroImage, 21: 1224-1231, 2004.
36. RUMIATI RI, ZANINI S, VORANO L and SHALLICE T. A form of ideational apraxia as a selective deficit of contention scheduling. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18: 617-642, 2001.
37. SCHWARTZ MF, BUXBAUM LJ, MONTGOMERY MW, FITZPATRICK-DE SALME EJ, HART T, FERRARO M, LEE SS and COSLETT HB. Naturalistic action production following right hemisphere stroke. Neuropsychologia, 37: 51-66, 1999.
38. SCHWARTZ MF, MONTGOMERY MW, BUXBAUM LJ, LEE SS, CAREW TG, COSLETT HB, FERRARO M, FITZPATRICK-DE SALME EJ, HART T and MAYER NH. Naturalistic action impairment in closed head injury. Neuropsychology, 12: 13-28, 1998.
39. SCHWARTZ MF, MONTGOMERY MW, FITZPATRICK-DE SALME EJ, OCHIPA C, COSLETT HB, and MAYER NH. Analysis of a disorder of everyday action. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12: 863-892, 1995.
40. SCHWARTZ MF, REED ES, MONTGOMERY MW, PALMER C and MAYER NH. The quantitative description of action disorganisation after brain damage: A case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8: 381-414, 1991.
41. SHALLICE T, BURGESS PW, SCHON F and BAXTER DM. The origins of utilisation behaviour. Brain, 112: 1587-1598, 1989.
42. TIPPER SP. The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A: 571-590, 1985.
43. TIPPER SP, DRIVER J and WEAVER B. Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A: 289-298, 1991.
44. TIPPER SP, WEAVER B and HOUGHTON G. Behavioural goals determine inhibitory mechanisms of selective attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 47A: 809-840, 1994.
45. TUCKER M and ELLIS R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24: 830-846, 1998.
46. VECERA SP, BEHRMANN M and FILAPEK JC. Attending to the parts of a single object: Part-based selection limitations. Perception and Psychophysics, 63: 308-321, 2001.
47. VECERA SP and FARAH MJ. Does visual attention select objects or locations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123: 146-160, 1994.