Naturalistic action production following right hemisphere stroke

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 51-66

  Schwartz, Myrna F ^a,b   Buxbaum, Laurel J ^a,b   Montgomery, Michael W ^a   Fitzpatrick Desalme, Eileen ^a   Hart, Tessa ^a   Ferraro, Mary ^a   Lee, Sonia S ^c   Coslett, H Branch ^a,b  

^a MOSS REHABILITATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Naturalistic action; Neglect; Resource capacity; Right hemisphere stroke; Supervisory attention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AROUSAL; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEAD INJURY; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; NEGLECT; SCORING SYSTEM; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0032192240     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00066-9     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Allport A. Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions? Attention and Performance XIV: A Silver Jubilee, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1993.
2. Baars BJ (ed.) Experimental Slips and Human Error: Exploring the Architecture of Volition. Plenum Press, New York, NY, 1992.
3. Boyd TM, Sautter W. Route-finding: A measure of everyday executive functioning in the head injured adult. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1993;7:171-181.
4. Brott THP, Adams J, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V, Rorick M, Moomaw CJ, Walker M. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: A clinical examination scale. Stroke 1989;20:864-870.
5. Buxbaum LJ, Schwartz MF. The role of semantic memory in object use. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 14:1997;219-254.
6. Buxbaum LJ, Schwartz MF, Coslett HB. Everyday action and praxis in callosal apraxia. Neurocase. 1:1995;3-17.
7. Buxbaum LJ, Schwartz MF, Montgomery MW. Ideational apraxia and naturalistic action. Cognitive Neuropsychology, in press.
8. Cooper R, Shallice T, Modelling the selection of routine action: Exploring the criticality of parameter values. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, eds Shafto MG, Langley, P. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahway, NJ, 1997, pp. 131-136.
9. Coslett HB, Bowers D. Reduction in cerebral activation after right hemisphere stroke. Neurology. 37:1987;957-962.
10. Gainotti G, Giustolisi L. Contralateral and ipsilateral disorders of visual attention in patients with unilateral brain damage. Journal of Neurology. 53:1990;422-426.
11. Glisky EL, Schacter DL, Tulving E. Learning and retention of computer-related vocabulary in memory-impaired patients: Method of vanishing cues. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1986;8:293-312.
12. Guide for the Use of the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (Adult FlM), Version 4.0. State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 1993.
13. Halligan PW, Burn JP, Marshall JC, Wade DT. Visuo-spatial neglect: Qualitative differences and laterality of cerebal lesion. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1992;55: 1060-1068.
14. Heilman KM, Schwartz HD. Hypoarousal in patients with the neglect syndrome and emotional indifference. Neurology. 28:1978;229-232.
15. Heilman KM. Frontal lobe neglect in man. Neurology. 22:1972;660-664.
16. Heilman KM. Right hemispheric dominance for mediating cerebral activation. Neurology. 17:1979;315-321.
17. Heilman KM, Watson KT. Mechanisms underlying the unilateral neglect syndrome. In Advancesin Neurology, eds Weinstein EA, Friedland RP, Vol 15. Raven Press, New York City, 1977, pp. 93-106.
18. Kahneman D. Attention and Effort. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1973.
19. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL. Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, 1978.
20. Navon D. Resources - A theoretical soup stone?. Psychological Review 1984;91:216-234.
21. Norman DA. Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review 1981;88:1-15.
22. Norman DA, Shallice T. Attention to action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior. Center for Human Information Processing (Technical Report No. 99). (Reprinted in revised form in Consciousness and Self-Regulation, eds Davidson RJ, Schwartz GE, Shapiro D. University of California, New York, 1986, pp. 1-18.
23. Pardo JV, Fox PT. Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography. Nature. 349:1991;61-64.
24. Pocock SJ. Clinical Trials: A Practical Approach. John Wiley, New York, 1983.
25. Posner MI, Inhoff AW, Friedrich FJ, Cohen A. Isolating attentional systems: A cognitive-anatomical analysis. Psychobiology 1987;15:107-121.
26. Posner MI. The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 13:1990;25-42.
27. Reason JT, Mycielska K. Absent minded? The Psychology of Mental Lapses and Everyday Errors. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1982.
28. Robertson IH. Anomalies in the lateralisation of omissions in unilateral left neglect: Implications for an attentional theory of neglect. Neuropsychologia 1989;27:157-165.
29. Robertson IH. The relationship between lateralised and nonlateralised attentional deficits in unilateral neglect. In Unilateral Neglect: Clinical and Experimental Studies, eds Robertson IH, Marshall JC. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Hove, 1993, pp. 257-278.
30. Robertson IH. Attentional load and visual neglect. International Journal of Neuroscience. 62:1992;45-56.
31. Robertson IH, Halligan PW, Bergego C, Hömberg V, Pizzamiglio L, Weber E. Right neglect following right hemisphere damage? Cortex. 30:1994;199-213.
32. Robertson IH, Manly T, Andrade J, Baddeley BT. Oops!; Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia. 35:1997;747-758.
33. Robertson IH, Ridgeway V, Greenfield E, Parr A. Motor recovery after stroke depends on intact sustained attention: A 2-year follow-up study. Neuropsychologia 1997;11:1-6.
34. Robertson IH, Tegner R, Tham K, Lo A, Nimmo-Smith I. Sustained attention training for unilateral neglect: Theoretical and rehabilitation implications. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1995;17:416-430.
35. Robertson IH, Ward A, Ridgeway V, Nimmo-Smith I. Test of Everyday Attention. Thames Valley Test Company, Flempton, 1994.
36. Schwartz MF. Re-examining the role of executive functions in routine action production. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1995;769:321-335.
37. Schwartz, MF, Buxbaum LJ. Naturalistic action. In Apraxia: The Neuropsychology of Action, eds Rothi LJG, Heilman KM. Psychology Press, East Sussex, 1997, pp. 269-289.
38. Schwartz MF, Mayer NH, Fitzpatrick-DeSalme EJ. Cognitive theory and the study of everyday action disorders after brain damage. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 8:1993;59-72.
39. Schwartz MF, Montgomery MW, Buxbaum LJ, Lee SS, Carew TG, Coslett BH, Ferraro M, Fitzpatrick-DeSalme E, Hart T. Naturalistic action impairment in closed head injury. Neuropsychology. 12:1997;13-28.
40. Schwartz MF, Montgomery MW, Fitzpatrick-DeSalme EJ, Ochipa C, Coslett HB. Analysis of a disorder of everyday action. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 12:1995;863-892.
41. Schwartz MF, Reed ES, Montgomery MW, Palmer C, Mayer NH. The quantitative description of action disorganization after brain damage: A case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1991;8:381-414.
42. Shallice T. From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988.
43. Shallice T. Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain. 114:1991;727-741.
44. Shallice T. The domain of supervisory processes and the temporal organization of behaviour. Transactions of the Royal Society. 351:1996;1405-1412.
45. Shallice T, Burgess PW, Schon F. The origins of utilization behavior. Brain. 112:1989;1587-1598.
46. Stuss DT, Shallice T, Alexander MP. A multidisciplinary approach to anterior attentional functions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 769:1995;191-212.
47. Weintraub S. Right cerebral dominance in spatial attention. Further evidence based on ipsilateral neglect. Archives of Neurology. 44:1987;621-625.
48. Wickens CD. Processing resources in attention. In Varieties of Attention, eds Parasuraman R., Davies DR. Academic Press, Orlando, 1984, pp. 63-102.
49. Wilkins AJ, Shallice T. Frontal lesions and sustained attention. Neuropsychologia. 25:1987;359-365.
50. Wilson BA, Alderman N, Burgess PW, Emslie H, Evans JJ. BADS: Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome. Thames Valley Test Co., Bury St. Edmunds, 1996.
51. Wilson BA, Cockburn J, Baddeley AD. The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test. Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St. Edmunds, 1985.