The influence of state annexation laws on the growth of selected southern cities

Southeastern Geographer

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 71-85

  Smirnova, Olga ^a   Ingalls, Jerry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Annexation; Central city growth; Municipal governments; Special purpose governments

Indexed keywords

HEALTH STATUS; LEGISLATION; METROPOLITAN AREA; POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY; POPULATION GROWTH; STATE ROLE;

ALABAMA; ARKANSAS; FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; GEORGIA; LOUISIANA; MISSISSIPPI; NORTH AMERICA; NORTH CAROLINA; SOUTH CAROLINA; TENNESSEE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34248345978     PISSN: 0038366X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/sgo.2007.0011     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Barlow, I.M. 1981. Spatial dimensions of urban government. New York: Research Studies Press.
2. Berube, A. 2003. Gaining but losing ground: Population change in large cities and their suburbs. In Redefining urban and suburban America, eds. B.J. Katz and R.E. Lang, 35-50. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
3. Berube, A., and B. Forman. 2003. Patchwork cities: Patterns of urban population growth in 1990s. In Redefining urban and suburban America, eds. B.J. Katz and R.E. Lang, 75-100. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
4. Black, E., and M. Black. 1987. Politics and society in the South. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
5. Census Bureau. 1973. 1972 boundary and annexation survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
6. Census of Governments. 2002. Government organization, Vol. 1, No. 1. Accessed September 3, 2004 at http://www.census.gov/govs/www/ cog2002.html.
7. Census of Population and Housing. 2000. Population and housing unit counts, Part I. United States Summary: 2000. Accessed 18 August 2005 at http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2000/.
8. Downs, A. 1981. Neighborhoods and urban development. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
9. Downs, A. 1994. Links between central cities and suburbs. In New visions for metropolitan America, ed. A. Downs, 45-59. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
10. Downs, A. 1998. How America's cities are growing: The big picture. Brookings Review 16(4):8-12
11. Feiock, R., and J. Carr. 2001. State annexation 'constraints' and the frequency of municipal annexation. Political Research Quarterly 54(2):459-470.
12. Foster, K. 1997. The political economy of special purpose government. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
13. Galloway, T., and J. Landis. 1986. How cities expand: Does state law make a difference? Growth and Change 17(4):25-46.
14. Garson, D. 1992. PA 765. Statnotes: An online textbook. Accessed 30 September 2005 at http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/ statnote.htm.
15. Gleaser, E., and J. Shapiro. 2003. City growth: Which places grew and why. In Redefining urban and suburban America, eds. B.J. Katz and R.E. Lang, 13-32. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
16. Gottlieb, P. 2000. The effect of poverty on metropolitan area economic performance. In Urban-suburban interdependencies, eds. R. Greenstein and W. Wiewel, 21-48. Cambridge: The Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
17. Greenstein, R., and W. Wiewel. 2000. Introduction to urban-suburban Interdependencies. In Urban-suburban interdependencies, eds. R. Greenstein and W. Wiewel, 1-19. Cambridge: The Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
18. Imbroscio, D. 1997. Reconstructing city politics: Alternative economic development and urban regimes. London: Sage.
19. Imbroscio, D. 2004. The imperative of economics in urban political analysis: A reply to Clarence Stone. Journal of Urban Affairs 26:21-26.
20. King, G., R. Koehane, and S. Verba. 1994. Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
21. Liner, G. 1990. Annexation rates and institutional constraints. Growth and Change 21(4):80-95.
22. Liner, G., and R.R. McGregor. 1996. Institutions and the market for annexable land. Growth and Change 27:55-74.
23. Liner, G., and R.R. McGregor. 2002. Optimal annexation. Applied Economics 34:1477-1485.
24. Mackun, P.J. 2005. Population change in metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas: 1990-2003. Current Population Reports, 25-1134. Accessed January 2006 at http://www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/ p25-1134.pdf.
25. Morgan, D., and P. Mareschal. 1999. Central-city/suburban inequality and metropolitan political fragmentation. Urban Affairs Review 34(4):578-595.
26. North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. OMB Bulletin No. 05-02. 2005. Update on the statistical area definitions and guide to their use. Accessed April 2005 at: http:// www.whitehouse.gov/omb/bulletins/fy05/b05-02.html.
28. Palmer, J., and G. Lindsey. 2001. Classifying state approaches to annexation. State and Local Government Review 33(1):60-73.
29. Rast, J. 2005. The politics of alternative economic development: Revisiting the Stone-Imbroscio debate. Journal of Urban Affairs 27(1):53-69.
30. Rusk, D. 2003. Cities without suburbs: A Census 2000 update (3rd Edition). Washington DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
31. Sengstock, F. 1960. Annexation: A solution to the metropolitan area problem. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Law School.
32. Sohmer, R., and R. Lang. 2003. Downtown rebound. In Redefining urban and suburban America, eds. B.J. Katz and R.E. Lang, 63-74. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
33. Stone, C. 2001. The Atlanta experience reexamined: The link between agenda and regime change. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 25:20-34.
34. Voith, R. 1998. Do suburbs need cities? Journal of Regional Science 38(3):445-464.
35. Wilson, C. 2000. Policy regimes and policy change. Journal of Public Policy 20(3):247-274.