The politics of alternative economic development: Revisiting the Stone-Imbroscio debate

Journal of Urban Affairs

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 53-69

  Rast, Joel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC PLANNING; URBAN PLANNING;

CHICAGO; ILLINOIS; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

EID: 18844396644     PISSN: 07352166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0735-2166.2005.00224.x     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Betancur, J. J., Bennett, D. E., & Wright, P. A. (1991). Effective strategies for community economic development. In P. Nyden & W. Wiewel (Eds.), Challenging uneven development: An urban agenda for the 1990s (pp. 198-224). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
2. Bratt, R. G. (1997). CDCs: Contributions outweigh contradictions, a reply to Randy Stoecker. Journal of Urban Affairs, 19, 23-28.
3. Bruyn, S. T,, & Meehan, J. (Eds.). (1987). Beyond the market and the state: New directions in community economic development. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
4. Capraro, J. F. (2004). Community organizing + community development = community transformation. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26, 151-161.
5. City of Chicago. (1984). Chicago works together: 1984 Chicago development plan. Chicago: City of Chicago.
6. Community Workshop on Economic Development. (1982). Draft platform of the Community Workshop on Economic Development. Chicago: CWED.
7. Daley: Cut bureaucracy, review PMD. (1989, January 30). Crain's Chicago Business, p. 32.
8. Davies, J. S. (2002). Urban regime theory: A normative-empirical critique. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24, 1-17.
9. DeFilippis, J. (2004). Unmaking Goliath: Community control in the face of global capital. New York: Routledge.
10. DeLeon, R. (1992). Left coast city: Progressive politics in San Francisco, 1975-1991. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
11. Department of City Planning. (1960). Locational patterns of major manufacturing industries in the city of Chicago, Chicago: Department of City Planning.
12. Department of Planning and Development. (1991). Corridors of industrial opportunity: A plan for industry in Chicago's West Side. Chicago: Department of Planning and Development.
13. Department of Planning and Development. (1992). Corridors of industrial opportunity: A plan for industry in Chicago's North Side. Chicago: Department of Planning and Development.
14. Department of Planning and Development. (1994). Corridors of industrial opportunity: A plan for industry in Chicago's South Side. Chicago: Department of Planning and Development.
15. Ducharme, D. (1991). Planned manufacturing districts: How a community initiative became pity policy. In P. Clavel & W. Wiewel (Eds.) Harold Washington and the neighborhoods: Progressive city government in Chicago, 1983-1987 (pp. 221-237). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
16. Ferman, B. (1991). Chicago: Power, race, and reform. In H. V. Savitch & J. C. Thomas (Eds.), Big city politics in transition (pp. 47-63). London: Sage.
17. Ferman,,B. (1996). Challenging the growth machine: Neighborhood politics in Chicago and Pittsburgh. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
18. Giloth, R.,(1985). Organizing for neighborhood development. Social Policy, 15(winter), 37-42.
19. Giloth, R. (1988). Community economic development: Strategies and practices of the 1980s. Economic Development Quarterly, 2, 343-350.
20. Gittell, R., & Vidal, A. (1998). Community organizing: Building social capital as a development strategy. London: Sage.
21. Hollander, E. (1991). The Department of Planning under Harold Washington. In P. Clavel & W. Wiewel (Eds.) Harold Washington and the neighborhoods. Progressive city government in Chicago, 1983-1987 (pp. 121-145). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
22. Illinois Department of Employment Security. (1983). Where workers work in the Chicago standard metropolitan statistical area. Springfield: Author.
23. Imbroscio, D. L. (1997). Reconstructing city politics: Alternative economic development and urban regimes. London: Sage.
24. Imbroscio, D. L. (1998a). Reformulating urban, regime theory: The division of labor between state and market reconsidered. Journal of Urban, Affairs, 20, 233-248.
25. Imbroscio, D. L. (1998b). The necessity of urban regime change: A reply to Clarence Stone. Journal of Urban Affairs, 20, 261-268.
26. Imbroscio, D.L. (1999). Structure, agency and democratic theory. Polity, 32, 45-66.
27. Imbroscio, D. L. (2003). Overcoming the neglect of economics in urban regime theory. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25, 271-284.
28. Imbroscio, D. L. (2004). The imperative of economics in urban political analysis: A reply to Clarence Stone. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26, 21-26.
29. Immergluck, D. (in press). Building power, losing power: The rise and fall of a prominent community economic development coalition. Economic Development Quarterly.
30. Johnson, M. A., &.Fornek, S. (1995, April 5). Three-peat; Daley cruises to third term. Chicago Sun-Times, p. 1.
31. Jones, B. D., & Bachelor, L. W. (1993). The sustaining hand: Community leadership and corporate power. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
32. Joravsky, B. (1988, September 2). No entry, gentry: New rules for the Clybourn Corridor. Chicago Reader.
33. Keating, W.D. (1997). The CDC model of urban development, a reply to Randy Stoecker. Journal of Urban Affairs, 19, 29-33.
34. Kleppner, P. (1985). Chicago divide: The making of a black mayor. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.
35. Levine, M. V. (2000). A third-world city in the first world: Social exclusion, racial inequality, and sustainable development in Baltimore. In M. Polese & R. Stren (Eds.), The social sustainability of cities: Diversity and management of change. (pp. 123-156). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
36. Levine, M. V. (1987), Downtown redevelopment as an urban growth strategy: A critical appraisal of the Baltimore renaissance. Journal of Urban, Affairs, 9, 103-123.
37. Medoff, P., & Sklar, H. (1994). Streets of hope: The fall and rise of an urban neighborhood, Boston: South End Press.
38. Mier, R., & Moe, K. J. (1991). Decentralized development: From theory to practice. In P. Clavel & W. Wiewel (Eds.), Harold Washington and the neigborhoods: Progressive city government in Chicago, 1983-1987 (pp. 64-99). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
39. Mier, R., Wiewel, W., & Alpern, L. (1992). Decentralization of policy making under Mayor Harold Washington. In K. Wong & T. N. Clark (Eds.), Politics of policy innovation in metropolitan Chicago pp. 79-101). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
40. Orr, M. E, & Stoker, G. (1994). Urban regimes and leadership in Detroit. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 30, 48-73.
41. Peterson, P. (1981). City limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42. Rast, J. (1999). Remaking Chicago: The political origins of urban industrial change. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.
43. Reardon, K. M. (1990). Local economic development in Chicago, 1983-1987. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
44. Rubin, H. J. (2000). Renewing hope within neighborhoods of despair: The community-based development model. Albany: State University of New York Press.
45. Schmid, J. (1986). Industrial reps create contact between small business, city. The Neighborhood Works, 9(1), 17-18.
46. Simpson, D. (2001). Rogues, rebels, and rubber stamps: The politics of the Chicago city council from 1863 to the present. Boulder: Westview Press.
47. Smith, W. (1995, March 20). Feather in cap of Goose Island? Industrial park may be in future. Chicago Sun- Times, p. 39.
48. Southeast Chicago Development Commission, (no date). The Lake Calumet Model Industrial Corridor strategic plan. Chicago: Author.
49. Squires, G., Bennett, L., McCourt, K., & Nyden, P. (1987). Chicago: Race, class, and the response to urban decline. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
50. Stoecker, R. (1997a). The CDC model of urban redevelopment: A critique and an alternative: Journal of Urban Affairs, 19, 1-22.
51. Stoecker, R. (1997b). Should we...could we...change the CDC model?, a rejoinder. Journal of Urban Affairs, 19, 35-44.
52. Stoecker, R. (2003). Understanding the development-organizing dialectic. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25, 493-512.
53. Stone, C. M (1989). Regime politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
54. Stone, C. N. (1993). Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach. Journal of Urban Affairs, 15, 1-28.
55. Stone, C. N. (1998). Regime analysis and the study of urban politics, a rejoinder. Journal of Urban Affairs, 20, 249-260.
56. Stone, C. N. (2001). The Atlanta experience re-examined: The link between agenda and regime change, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25, 20-34.
57. Stone, C. N. (2004a). It's more than the economy after all: Continuing the debate about urban regimes. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26, 1-19.
58. Stone, C. N. (2004b). Rejoinder: Multiple imperatives, or some thoughts about governance in a loosely coupled but stratified society. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26, 35-42.
59. Swanstrom, T. (1985). The crisis of growth politics: Cleveland, Kucinich, and, the challenge of urban populism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
60. Tilly, C. (1984). Big structures, large processes, huge corporations. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
61. Williamson, T., Imbroscio, D., & Alperovitz, G. (2002). Making a place for community: Local democracy in a global era. New York: Routledge.
62. Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.