Media frames for black bear management stories during issue emergence in New York

Human Dimensions of Wildlife

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 89-100

  Siemer, William F ^a   Decker, Daniel J ^a   Shanahan, James ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Black bear management; Content analysis; Framing; Mass media; Ursus americanus

Indexed keywords

URSUS AMERICANUS;

EID: 34248170870     PISSN: 10871209     EISSN: 1533158X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10871200701195415     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Arvai, J. L., & Mascarenhas, M. J. (2001). Print media framing of the environmental movement in a Canadian forestry debate. Environmental Management, 27(5), 705-714.
2. Atwater, T., Salwen, M., & Anderson, R. (1985). Media agenda setting with environmental issues. Journalism Quarterly, 62(2), 393-397.
3. Corbett, J. B. (1992). Rural and urban newspaper coverage of wildlife: Conflict, community and bureaucracy. Journalism Quarterly, 69(4), 929-937.
4. Corbett, J. B. (1995). When wildlife make the news: An analysis of rural and urban north-central US newspapers. Public Understanding of Science, 4(4), 397-410.
5. Eliason, S. L. (2001). Structural foundations, triggering events, and ballot initiatives: The case of proposition 5. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 29(1), 207-210.
6. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51-58.
7. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1987). The changing culture of affirmative action. In R. G. Braungart & M. M. Braungart (Eds.), Research in political sociology, Vol. 3 (pp. 137-177). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
9. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1-37.
10. Gans, H. (1979). Deciding what's news. New York: Patheon.
11. Hammond, J. S., Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1999). Smart choices: A practical guide to making better life decisions. New York: Broadway Books.
12. IAFWA (International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies). (2004). Potential costs of losing hunting and trapping as wildlife management tools. Washington, D.C.: Animal Use Issues Committee, IAFWA.
13. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible?: How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
15. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30, 411-433.
16. Lange, J. I. (1993). The logic of competing information campaigns: Conflict over old growth and the spotted owl. Communication Monographs, 60, 239-257.
17. Lombardi, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Brachen, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication research: An assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28, 587-604.
18. McKinney, M. L. (2006). Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biological Conservation, 127, 247-260.
19. NYSDEC (New York State Department of Environmental Conservation). (2003). A framework for black bear management in New York. Albany: New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
20. Odell, J., Mather, M. E., & Muth, R. M. (2005). A biosocial approach for analyzing environmental conflicts: A case study of horseshoe crab allocation. Bioscience, 55(9), 735-748.
21. Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News, values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (pp. 173-212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
22. Riley, S. J., Decker, D. J., Carpenter, L. H., Organ, J. F., Siemer, W. F., Mattfeld, G. F., et al. (2002). The essence of wildlife management. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 30(2), 585-593.
23. Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49, 103-122.
24. Scott, W. A. (1955). Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19, 321-325.
25. Sei-Hill, K., Scheufele, D. A., & Shanahan, J. (2002). Think about it this way: Attribute agendasetting function of the press and the public's evaluation of a local issue. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(1), 7-25.
26. Shah, D. V., Watts, M. D, Domke, D., & Fan, D. P. (2002). News framing and cueing of issue regimes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 339-370.
27. Shea, K., & Chesson, P. (2002). Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 170-176.
28. Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the message (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
29. Siemer, W. F., & Decker, D. J. (2003). 2002 New York State Black Bear Management Survey: Study Overview and Findings Highlights. Human Dimensions Research Unit Series Publication 03-6. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Department of Natural Resources.
30. Smith, C. (1992). Media and apocalypse: News coverage of the Yellowstone forest fires, Exxon Valdez oil spill, and Loma Prieta earthquake. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing.
31. Valkenburg, P. M., Semetko, H. A., & De Vreese, C. H. (1999). The effects of news frames on readers' thoughts and recall. Communication Research, 26, 550-569.
32. Wallack, L. (1994). Media advocacy: A strategy for empowering people and communities. Journal of Public Health Policy, 15(4), 420-436.
33. Wolch, J. R., Gullo, A., & Lassiter, U. (1997). Changing attitudes toward California's cougars. Society & Animals, 5(2), 9-116.
34. Zinn, H. C., & Manfredo, M. J. (2000). An experimental test of rational and emotional appeals about a recreation issue. Leisure Sciences, 22, 183-194.