Structural foundations, triggering events, and ballot initiatives: The case of proposition 5

Wildlife Society Bulletin

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 207-210

  Eliason, S L ^a  

^a Social Work and Criminology ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Animal protection groups; Ballot initiatives; Hunting; Law; Wildlife policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035053513     PISSN: 00917648     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Crusader activists and the 1996 Colorado anti-trapping campaign
2. Demographics of voting on the 1996 Massachusetts ballot referendum
3. Changing attitudes and funding for wildlife -preserving the sport hunter
4. Colorado black bear hunting referendum: What was behind the vote?
5. Hunting - An exercise in pluralistic democracy
6. Understanding voter behavior of wildlife ballot initiatives: Colorado's trapping amendment
7. Wildlife policy-making by the electorate: An overview of citizen-sponsored ballot measures on hunting and trapping
8. Forging a new wildlife management paradigm: Integrating animal protection values
9. A survey of hunting opponents
10. Introduction: Ballot initiatives and natural resource management: Some opinions on processes, impacts, and experience
11. Origins, history, and current use of ballot initiatives in wildlife management