Modeling Bose-Einstein correlations via elementary emitting cells

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 75, Issue 7, 2007, Pages

  Utyuzh, Oleg ^a   Wilk, Grzegorz ^a   Włodarczyk, Zbigniew ^b  

^a SOLTAN INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR STUDIES   (Poland)

^b JAN KOCHANOWSKI UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247608789     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.074030     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Compare QM05 Proceedings, Nucl. Phys. A774 (2006); NUPABL 0375-9474
2. for specialized reviews, see also K.J. Eskola, Nucl. Phys. A698, 78 (2002); NUPABL 0375-9474 10.1016/S0375-9474(01)01350-1
3. or S.A. Bass, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 41, 255 (1998). PPNPDB 0146-6410 10.1016/S0146-6410(98)00058-1
4. G. Goldhaber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 181 (1959); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.3.181
5. G. Goldhaber Phys. Rev. 120, 300 (1960). PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.120.300
6. In fact, at the beginning the observed effect was called GGLP effect in distinction to an apparently similar effect observed in astronomy and known as HBT effect which was used to obtain stellar dimensions, see T.J. Humanic, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 15, 197 (2006) for most recent review and references therein. IMPEER 0218-3013 10.1142/S0218301306003977
7. Other important reviews are in whereas pedagogical descriptions of BEC are provided in. Finally, in one can find a valuable collection of seminal papers concerning different aspects of BEC.
8. W.A. Zajc, Phys. Rev. D 35, 3396 (1987). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.35.3396
9. It means that the unobserved yield acts as a kind of heath bath influencing measured observables. Actually this is the main origin of the known spectacular success of the statistical description of such reactions with temperature T being the most important parameter describing the influence of such a heath bath, see G. Wilk, hep-ph/0610292 [Braz. J. Phys. (to be published)], and references therein. BJPHE6 0103-9733
10. U.A. Wiedemann and U. Heinz, Phys. Rep. 319, 145 (1999); PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00032-0
11. R.M. Weiner, Phys. Rep. 327, 249 (2000); PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00114-3
12. T. Csörgo, Acta Phys. Hung. A-Heavy Ion Phys. 15, 1 (2002);
13. Particle Production Spanning MeV and TeV Energies, edited by, W. Kittel,,, NATO Science Series C Vol. 554 (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2000), p. 203;
14. W. Kittel, Acta Phys. Pol. B APOBBB 0587-4254 32, 3927 (2001);
15. G. Alexander, Rep. Prog. Phys. 66, 481 (2003). RPPHAG 0034-4885 10.1088/0034-4885/66/4/202
16. W.A. Zajc, in Particle Production in Highly Excited Matter, edited by, H.H.Gutbrod, and, J. Rafelski, (Plenum Press, New York, 1993), p. 435.
17. R.M. Weiner, Introduction to BEC and Subatomic Interferometry (Wiley, New York, 1999).
18. G.A. Kozlov, O.V. Utyuzh, and G. Wilk, Phys. Rev. C 68, 024901 (2003); PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.68.024901
19. G.A. Kozlov O.V. Utyuzh G. Wilk Ukr. J. Phys. 48, 1313 (2003).
20. Closer inspection reveals that one rather gets in this way a Fourier transform of distributions of spatiotemporal two-particle separations (or correlation lengths). Recently the possibility of sort of imaging the hadronization region by using data on C2 has been pursued, see D.A. Brown, Phys. Rev. C 72, 054902 (2005), and references therein. PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.72.054902
21. M. Biyajima, N. Suzuki, G. Wilk, and Z. Włodarczyk, Phys. Lett. B 386, 297 (1996). PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/0370-2693(96)00894-5
22. H. Merlitz and D. Pelte, Z. Phys. A ZPAHEX 0939-7922 357, 175 (1997). 10.1007/s002180050232
23. Compare also U.A. Wiedemann, Phys. Rev. C 56, R614 (1997); PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.56.R614
24. T. Csörgo and J. Zimányi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 916 (1998); PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.916
25. T. Csörgo J. Zimányi Acta Phys. Hung. A-Heavy Ion Phys. 9, 241 (1999).
26. H. Merlitz and D. Pelte, Z. Phys. A ZPAHEX 0939-7922 351, 187 (1995). 10.1007/BF01289528
27. J.G. Cramer, " Event Simulation of High-Order Bose-Einstein and Coulomb Correlations " (University of Washington, 1996, unpublished).
28. T. Osada, M. Maruyama, and F. Takagi, Phys. Rev. D 59, 014024 (1998). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.014024
29. K. Fiałkowski, R. Wit, and J. Wosiek, Phys. Rev. D 58, 094013 (1998); PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.58.094013
30. T. Wibig, Phys. Rev. D 53, 3586 (1996); PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.53.3586
31. B. Andersson, Acta Phys. Pol. B APOBBB 0587-4254 29, 1885 (1998);
32. K. Geiger, J. Ellis, U. Heinz, and U.A. Wiedemann, Phys. Rev. D 61, 054002 (2000); PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.61.054002
33. Q.H. Zhang, U.A. Wiedemann, C. Slotta, and U. Heinz, Phys. Lett. B 407, 33 (1997). PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00710-7
34. B. Andersson and M. Ringner, Nucl. Phys. NUPBBO 0550-3213 B513, 627 (1998). 10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00722-0
35. L. Lönnblad and T. Sjöstrand, Eur. Phys. J. C 2, 165 (1998). EPCFFB 1434-6044 10.1007/s100520050131
36. O.V. Utyuzh, G. Wilk, and Z. Włodarczyk, Phys. Lett. B 522, 273 (2001). PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/S0370-2693(01)01306-5
37. O.V. Utyuzh, G. Wilk, and Z. Włodarczyk, Acta Phys. Pol. B APOBBB 0587-4254 33, 2681 (2002).
38. O.V. Utyuzh, G. Wilk, and Z. Włodarczyk, in Proceedings of the XXXII ISMD, Alushta, Crimea, Ukraine, 2002, edited by, A. Sissakian,,, G. Kozlov,, and, E. Kolganova,, [Acta Phys. Polon. B 33, 2681 (2002)].
39. The only discussion of such changes we are aware of is in where it was shown that an enforcing effect of BEC into a simple cascade model results in the appearances of multicharged vertices, not present in the original scheme. For more details, see and references therein.
40. A. Giovannini and L. Van Hove, Z. Phys. C 30, 391 (1986); ZPCFD2 0170-9739 10.1007/BF01557602
41. see also P. Carruthers and C.S. Shih, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 2, 1447 (1987). IMPAEF 0217-751X 10.1142/S0217751X87000806
42. U.A. Wiedemann, P. Foka, H. Kalechofsky, M. Martin, C. Slotta, and Q.H. Zhang, Phys. Rev. C 56, R614 (1997); PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.56.R614
43. M. Martin, H. Kalechofsky, P. Foka, and U.A. Wiedemann, Eur. Phys. J. C 2, 359 (1998). EPCFFB 1434-6044 10.1007/s100520050146
44. The reason is obvious. When only mean multiplicity n̄ is fixed, the most probable distribution according to the IT approach is a geometrical (or Bose-Einstein) one. Such is therefore distribution of particles in each cell in rapidity, therefore their composition will result in P(n) of NB type.
45. Actually one obtains in this way only some part of this intermittency signal. Nevertheless this fact suggests that fluctuations connected with intermittency are, at least to some extent, the same as those caused by BEC (or both have the same origin), cf. P. Carruthers, E.M. Friedlander, C.C. Shih, and R.M. Weiner, Phys. Lett. B 222, 487 (1989) and. PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/0370-2693(89)90350-X
46. R.M. Weiner, Bose-Einstein Correlations in Particle and Nuclear Physics (Wiley, New York, 1997), collection of selected articles.
47. K. Zalewski, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. NPBSE7 0920-5632 74, 65 (1999); 10.1016/S0920-5632(99)00135-8
48. K. Zalewski Lect. Notes Phys. 539, 291 (2000). LNPHA4 0075-8450
49. E.E. Purcell, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 178, 1449 (1956). 10.1038/1781449a0
50. Compare also L. Mandel, E.C.G. Sudarshan, and E. Wolf, Proc. Phys. Soc. PPSOAU 0370-1328 84, 435 (1964). 10.1088/0370-1328/84/3/313
51. A. Giovannini and H.B. Nielsen, The Niels Bohr Institute Report No. NBI-HE-73-17 (unpublished).
52. See also Proceedings of the IV International Symposium on Multiparticle Hadrodynamics, Pavia, 1973, edited by, F. Duimio,,, A. Giovannini,, and, S. Ratii,, p. 538.
53. Notice that, in general, the multiplicity distribution function satisfies the relation: P(n+1)/P(n)=g(n)/(n+1), where (n+1) is a reflection of the fact that with n particles given the (n+1)th one can be allocated in n+1 ways. Different g(n) result in different forms of P(n). In particular, for g(n)=a one gets (after normalization) P(n)=ane-a/n!, whereas g(n)=p(n+1) results (after normalization) in P(n)=(1-p)pn, i.e., in a geometrical distribution, which means that the emission of an extra particle is enhanced by a factor (n+1) and this is Bose-Einstein enhancement and the emission with this is usually called stimulated emission.
54. See, for example, R. Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1983), 2nd ed.;
55. J.W. Goodman, Statistical Optics (Wiley, New York, 1985).
56. M. Biyajima, Prog. Theor. Phys. 69, 966 (1983); PTPKAV 0033-068X 10.1143/PTP.69.966
57. M. Biyajima Phys. Lett. 137B, 225 (1984). PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/0370-2693(84)90234-X
58. W.J. Knox, Phys. Rev. D 10, 65 (1974); PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.10.65
59. E.H. De Groot and H. Satz, Nucl. Phys. NUPBBO 0550-3213 B130, 257 (1977); 10.1016/0550-3213(77)90106-7
60. J. Kripfganz, Acta Phys. Pol. B APOBBB 0587-4254 8, 945 (1977);
61. A.M. Cooper, O. Miyamura, A. Suzuki, and K. Takahashi, Phys. Lett. 87B, 393 (1979); PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/0370-2693(79)90562-8
62. F. Takagi, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 120, 201 (1995). PTPSEP 0375-9687
63. K. Fiałkowski, in Proceedings of the XXX ISMD, Tihany, Hungary, 2000, edited by, T. Csörgo,, (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001), p. 357;
64. M. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. D 65, 096008 (2002). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.096008
65. R. Kacker and I. Olkin, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 110, 67 (2005). JRITEF 1044-677X
66. J. Finkelstein, Phys. Rev. D 37, 2446 (1988); PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.37.2446
67. Ding-wei Huang, Phys. Rev. D 58, 017501 (1998). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.58.017501
68. It is interesting to notice at this point that the best fits to C2(δE) and C2(δpx) for σ0=0.1 presented here can be obtained by using, respectively [x=δi and y=C2(δi)], shifted Gaussian y=y0+2/πAexp[-2(x-xc)2/w2]/w (with y0=0.724, xc=-0.125, w=0.922, and A=1.186), and shifted Lorentzian y=y0+(2Aw/π)/[4(x-xc)2+w2] (with y0=0.744, xc=0.0003, w=1.221, and A=1.154). Notice that the later shape belongs to the category of Lévy distributions discussed in the context of BEC in T. Csörgo, S. Hegyi, and W. Zajc, Eur. Phys. J. C 36, 36 (2004) because of their connection with the possible fractality of the hadronizing source. In fact one could as well use other forms of the G(E) function in Eq. 18 to get still another form of C2, EPCFFB 1434-6044 10.1140/epjc/s2004-01870-9
69. see, for example, T. Mizoguchi, M. Biyajima, and T. Kageya, Prog. Theor. Phys. 91, 905 (1994); PTPKAV 0033-068X 10.1143/PTP.91.905
70. T. Mizoguchi M. Biyajima T. Kageya [for more details cf. AIP Conf. Proc. 828 (2006)]. APCPCS 0094-243X
71. I.V. Andreev, M. Plümer, B.R. Schlei, and R.M. Weiner, Phys. Rev. D 49, 1217 (1994). PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.1217
72. V.V. Begun and M.I. Gorenstein, hep-ph/0611043;
73. for references to high multiplicity measurement projects, see E. Kokoulina, A. Kutov, and V. Nikitin, hep-ph/0612364 [Braz. J. Phys. (to be published)]. BJPHE6 0103-9733
74. See, for example, A.M. Gavrilik, Symm., Integ. Geom., Meth. Appl. 2, 074 (2006);
75. Ch.A. Nelson and P.R. Shimpi, math-ph/0610075.
76. This should be contrasted, for example, with the concept of resonant "halo" discussed in S. Nickerson, T. Csörgo, and D. Kiang, Phys. Rev. C 57, 3251 (1998), which is not able to do so. PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.57.3251
77. See, for example, O. Pooth (OPAL Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. NPBSE7 0920-5632 152, 35 (2006), and references therein. 10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2005.08.006
78. This is a potentially very interesting result deserving further specialized consideration, which, however, would lead us outside the scope of the present paper. In this respect, we refer to the work by E.K.G. Sarkisyan, Phys. Lett. B 477, 1 (2000), where different multiplicity distributions were studied from the point of view of intermittency and higher-order correlations. PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00223-9
79. Similarly, in G. Abbiendi (OPAL Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 523, 35 (2001), one can find studies of intermittency and especially of the higher-order genuine correlations made with an all-charge vs like-sign group of hadrons compared to the Bose-Einstein effect. PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/S0370-2693(01) 01332-6
80. O.V. Utyuzh, G. Wilk, and Z. Włodarczyk, AIP Conf. Proc. 828, 75 (2006); APCPCS 0094-243X 10.1063/1.2197398
81. O.V. Utyuzh G. Wilk Z. Włodarczyk Nukleonika (Supplement 2) 49, S33 (2004);
82. O.V. Utyuzh G. Wilk Z. Włodarczyk Acta Phys. Hung. A-Heavy Ion Phys. 25, 83 (2006);
83. O.V. Utyuzh G. Wilk Z. Włodarczyk Nukleonika (Supplement 3) 51, S105 (2006).
84. T. Osada, O.V. Utyuzh, G. Wilk, and Z. Włodarczyk, Eur. Phys. J. B 50, 7 (2006), and references therein. EPJBFY 1434-6028 10.1140/epjb/e2006- 00105-2
85. M. Biyajima, T. Mizoguchi, T. Osada, and G.Wilk, Phys. Lett. B 353, 340 (1995); PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/0370-2693(95)00547-X
86. M. Biyajima T. Mizoguchi T. Osada G.Wilk Phys. Lett. B 366, 394 (1996); PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/0370-2693(95)01339-3
87. see also the review by O.V. Utyuzh, AIP Conf. Proc. 828, 595 (2006). APCPCS 0094-243X 10.1063/1.2197475
88. Compare, for example, A.E. Ezhov and A.Yu. Khrennikov, Phys. Rev. E 71, 016138 (2005); PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.016138
89. K. Stalinas, cond-mat/0001436;
90. K. Stalinas cond-mat/0001347.
91. R. Kutner and M. Regulski, Comput. Phys. Commun. 121-122, 586 (1999); CPHCBZ 0010-4655 10.1016/S0010-4655(99)00412-9
92. cf. also R. Kutner, K.W. Kehr, W. Renz, and R. Przeniosło, J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 28, 923 (1995). 10.1088/0305-4470/28/4/017
93. G. Bianconi and A.-L. Barabási, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5632 (2001). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5632
94. R.J. Glauber, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 1267 (2006), and references therein. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.78.1267
95. That this point can be important is demonstrated, for example, in N. Borghini, Eur. Phys. J. C 30, 381 (2003) EPCFFB 1434-6044 10.1140/epjc/s2003- 01265-6
96. and N. Borghini Phys. Rev. C 75, 021904 (2007); PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.75.021904
97. B.B. Back, Phys. Rev. C 72, 064906 (2005) PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.72.064906
98. or in Z. Chajcki and M. Lisa, nucl-th/0612080.
99. For example, the sequential choice of energies from the distribution f′(E)=E•f(E) would result in an event reproducing the initial distribution f(E) and conserving energy [because sampling from uniform distribution xk[0,1-x1-x2 - xk-1] results in P(x)=1/x, cf., M. Shibata, Phys. Rev. D 24, 1847 (1981)]. This could be thought as a natural method to follow. However, it turns out that one cannot correct imbalances in momenta px,y,z just by rotating all angles by some fixed (ΔΘ,ΔΦ), the rescaling of at least one component is necessary. This ruins the original energy balance and needs further corrections. PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.24. 1847
100. It is interesting to note that distributions of QTOT in Fig. 16 follow Gaussian form for small P0, for P0=0.9 which becomes the so-called q-Gaussian distribution (known from Tsallis statistics, see reference in).
101. P. Abreu (DELPHI Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 286, 201 (1992); PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/0370-2693(92)90181-3
102. P. Abreu Phys. Lett. B 247, 137 (1990). PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/0370-2693(90)91062-G
103. E.A. De Wolf, I.M. Dremin, and W. Kittel, Phys. Rep. 270, 1 (1996); PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/0370-1573(95)00069-0
104. P. Boek, M. Płoszajczak, and R. Botet, Phys. Rep. 252, 101 (1995); PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/0370-1573(94)00075-E
105. I.V. Andreev, I.M. Dremin, M. Biyajima, and N. Suzuki, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 10, 3951 (1995). IMPAEF 0217-751X 10.1142/S0217751X95001856
106. A. Kisiel, T. Tałuć, W. Broniowski, and W. Florkowski, Comput. Phys. Commun. 174, 669 (2006). CPHCBZ 0010-4655 10.1016/j.cpc.2005.11. 010