Assessment of distraction regenerate using quantitative bone scintigraphy

Annals of Plastic Surgery

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 328-334

  Eski, Muhitdin ^a   Ilgan, Seyfettin ^a   Cil, Yakup ^a   Sengezer, Mustafa ^a   Ozcan, Ayhan ^a   Yapici, Kerim ^a  

^a GULHANE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Assessment of distraction osteogenesis; Histomorphometry; Quantitative bone scintigraphy

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE SCINTISCANNING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RAT; SKIN INCISION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ANIMALS; BONE AND BONES; CEPHALOMETRY; MALE; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION; RADIONUCLIDE IMAGING; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REGENERATION;

EID: 34247600534     PISSN: 01487043     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000237634.38881.a1     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. McCarthy JG, Stelnicki EJ, Mehrara BJ, et al. Distraction osteogenesis of craniofacial skeleton. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:1812-1827.
2. Ashinoff RL, Cetrulo CL, Galiano RD, et al. Bone morphogenic protein-2 gene therapy for mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;52:585-590.
3. Cho BC, Moon JH, Chung HY, et al. The bone regenerative effect of growth hormone on consolidation in mandibular distraction osteogenesis of a dog model. J Craniofac Surg. 2003;14:417-425.
4. Swennen GRJ, Eulzer C, Schutyser F, et al. Assessment of the distraction regenerate using three-dimensional quantitive computer tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;34:64-73.
5. Rowe NM, Mehrara BJ, Dudziak ME, et al. Rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis, part I: histologic and radiographic analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:2022-2032.
6. Thurmuller P, Troulis M, O'Neill MJ, et al. Use of ultrasound to assess healing of a mandibular distraction wound. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;60:1038-1044.
7. Friedrich RE, Hellner D, Plambeck K, et al. Application of B-scan ultrasonography for analysis of callus distraction in vascularized fibular grafts of the mandible: a report of three patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;55:635-640.
8. Kaban LB, Coppe C, O'Neill MJ, et al. Ultrasonography and ultra-sonometry: a non-invasive technique for assessment of the distraction osteogenesis wound. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;30:S6.
9. Troulis MJ, Coppe C, O'Neill MJ, et al. Ultrasound: assessment of the distraction osteogenesis wound in patients undergoing mandibular lengthening. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:1144-1149.
10. Kaban LB, Thurmuller P, Troulis M, et al. Correlation of biomechanical stiffness with plain radiographic and ultrasound data in an experimental mandibular distraction wound. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32:296-304.
11. Klein C, Becker C. CT-assisted volumetry and densitometry of distraction osteogenesis lengthened mandibular areas. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2000;4:446-453.
12. Roth D, Gosain A, McCarthy JG, et al. A CT scan technique for quantitative volumetric assessment of the mandible after distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:1237-1247.
13. Noji H, Yoshimasu H, Aoki K, et al. Non-invasive densitometric and histomorphometric study of the regenerated bone in the distraction gap in rabbits. J Med Dent Sci. 2000;47:197-207.
14. Stewart KJ, Lvoff GO, White SA, et al. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a comparison of distraction rates in the rabbit model. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1998;26:43-49.
15. Stewart KJ, Weyand B, van't Hof RJ, et al. A quantitative analysis of the effect of insulin-like growth factor-1 infusion during mandibular distraction osteogenesis in rabbits. Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52:343-350.
16. Schwartz DA, Arman KG, Elmeligy A, et al. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry vs MCT analysis of BMD in mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(suppl):37.
17. Kolbeck S, Bail H, Weiler A, et al. Digital radiography: a predictor of regenerate bone stiffness in distraction osteogenesis. Clin Orthop. 1999;366:221-228.
18. Subramanian G, McAfee JG, Blair RJ, et al. Technetium-99m-methylene diphosphanate: a superior agent for skeletal imaging: comparison with other technetium complexes. J Nucl Med. 1975;16:744-755.
19. Felemovicius J, Ortiz Monasterio F, Gomez Radillo LS, et al. Determining the optimal time for consolidation after distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg. 2000;11:430-436.
20. Warnke PH, Springer IN, Wiltfang J, et al. Growth and transplantation of a custom vascularised bone graft in a man. Lancet. 2004;364:766-770.
21. Boudrieau RJ, Mitchell SL, Seeherman H. Mandibular reconstruction of a partial hemimandibulectomy in a dog with severe malocclusion. Vet Surg. 2004;33:119-130.
22. Eski M, Nisanci M, Cil Y, et al. A custom-made distraction device for experimental mandibular distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg. 2005;16:675-683.
23. Hughes TH, Maffulli N, Green V, et al. Imaging in bone lengthening: a review. Clin Orthop. 1994;308:50-53.
24. Maffulli N, Cheng JC, Sher A, et al. Bone mineralization at the callotasis site after completion of lengthening. Bone. 1999;25:333-338.
25. Eyres KS, Bell MJ, Kanis JA. Methods of assessing new bone formation during limb lengthening: ultrasonography, dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and radiography compared. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1993;75:358-364.
26. Aronson J, Good B, Stewart C, et al. Preliminary studies of mineralization during distraction of osteogenesis. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1990;250:43-49.
27. Aronson J, Harrison B, Boyd CM, et al. Mechanical induction of osteogenesis: preliminary studies. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1988;18:195-203.
28. Abu-Serriah M, Ayoub A, Boyd J, et al. The role of ultrasound in monitoring reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects using osteogenic protein-1(rhOP-1). Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32:619-627.
29. Richter D, Hahn MP, Ostermann PA, et al. Ultrasound follow-up of callus distraction of the tibia: technique, possibilities and limits. Chirurg. 1996;67:1152-1159.
30. Young JW, Kostrubiak IS, Resnick CS, et al. Sonographic evaluation of bone production at the distraction site in Ilizarov limb-lengthening procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154:125-128.
31. Storey G, Murray IPC. Bone scintigraphy: the procedure and interpretation. In: Ell PJ, Gambhir SS, eds. Nuclear Medicine in Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 2004:594-600.
32. Kawano M, Taki J, Tsuchiya H, et al. Predicting the outcome of distraction osteogenesis by 3-phase bone scintigraphy. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:369-374.
33. Glowacki J, Shusterman ME, Troulis M, et al. Distraction osteogenesis of the porcine mandible: histomorphometric evaluation of bone. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:566-573.
34. Rowe NM, Mehrara BJ, Luchs JS, et al. Angiogenesis during mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;42:470-475.
35. Aronson J. Temporal and spatial increase in blood flow during distraction osteogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;301:124-131.
36. Koji M, Tsuchiya H, Junichi T, et al. Blood flow measurement during distraction osteogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;1:229-235.