The role of information presentation formats in belief updating

International Journal of Psychology

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 189-199

  Shen, Yung Cheng ^a   Hue, Chih Wei ^b  

^a YUAN ZE UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247598360     PISSN: 00207594     EISSN: 1464066X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207590601126676     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Anderson, N. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.
2. Anderson, N. (1991). A cognitive theory of judgment and decision. In N. Anderson (Ed.), Contributions to information integration theory: Vol. 1, Cognition (pp. 105-142). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
3. Benassi, M. (1982). Effects of order presentation, primacy, and physical attractiveness on attributions of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 48-58.
4. Carlson, R. A., & Dulany, D. E. (1988). Diagnostic reasoning with circumstantial evidence. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 463-492.
5. Childers, T. L., & Viswanathan, M. (2000). Representation of numerical and verbal product information in consumer memory. Journal of Business Research, 47, 109-120.
6. Curley, S. P., Young, M. J., Kingry, M. J., & Yates, J. F. (1988). Primacy effects in clinical judgments of contingency. Medical Decision Making, 8, 216-222.
7. Einhorn, H., & Hogarth, R. (1986). Ambiguity and uncertainty in probabilistic inference. Psychological Review, 92, 433-461.
8. Furnham, A. (1986). The robustness of the recency effect: Studies using legal evidence. The Journal of General Psychology, 113, 351-357.
9. Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowledge: toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67-82). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
10. Graesser, C. C., & Anderson, N. (1974). Cognitive algebra of the equation: gift size = generosity × income. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 692-699.
11. Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1992). Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 1-55.
12. Huber, J., Payne, W. J., & Puto, C. (1982). Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 90-98.
13. Hue, C., Peng, C., Shen, Y., & Yang, J. (1990). A numerical translation of Chinese probability terms. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 31, 1-6.
14. Jacoby, J., Morrin, M., Jaccard, J., Gurhan, Z., Kuss, A., & Maheswaran, D. (2002). Mapping attitude formation as a function of information input: Online processing models of attitude formation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12, 21-34.
15. Johar, G. V., Jedidi, K., & Jacoby, J. (1997). A varying-parameter averaging model of on-line brand evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 232-247.
16. Johnson, E. N. (1995). Effects of information order, group assistance and experience on auditors' sequential belief revision. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16, 137-160.
17. Levin, I. P., Johnson, R. D., & Faraone, S. V. (1984). Information integration in price-quality tradeoffs: The effect of missing information. Memory and Cognition, 12, 96-102.
18. Lichtenstein, M., & Srull, T. (1987). Processing objectives as a determinant of the relationship between judgment and recall. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 93-118.
19. Lindberg, E. T., Garling, T., & Montgomery, H. (1988). People's beliefs and values as determinants of housing preferences and simulated choices. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 5, 181-197.
20. Lindberg, E. T., Garling, T., & Montgomery, H. (1991). Prediction of preferences for choice between verbally and numerically described alternatives. Acta Psychologica, 76, 165-176.
21. Lopes, L. L. (1982). Toward a procedural theory of judgment. Technical report, Wisconsin Human Information Processing Program (WHIPP 17), Madison, WI.
22. Lopes, L. L. (1985). Averaging rules and adjustment processes in Bayesian inference. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 509-512.
23. Lopes, L. L. (1987). Procedural debiasing. Acta Psychologica, 64, 167-185.
24. Luchins, A. S., & Luchins, E. H. (1986). Primacy and recency effects with descriptions of moral and immoral behavior. The Journal of General Psychology, 113, 159-177.
25. Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of human judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26. Payne, J. W. (1982). Contingent decision behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 382-402.
27. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 242-258.
29. Scammon, D. L. (1977). Information load and consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 148-155.
30. Sen, S. (1998). Knowledge, information mode, and the attraction effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 64-77.
31. Shanteau, J. (1975). Averaging versus multiplying combination rules of inference judgment. Acta Psychologica, 39, 83-89.
32. Stone, D. N., & Schkade, D. A. (1991). Numeric and linguistic information representation in multiattribute choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49, 42-59.
33. Stone, D. N., & Schkade, D. A. (1994). Effects of attribute scales on process and performance in multiattribute choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59, 261-287.
34. Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Accountability and the perseverance of first impressions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 285-292.
35. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
36. Viswanathan, M., & Childers, T. L. (1996). Processing of numerical and verbal product information. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 5, 359-385.
37. Viswanathan, M., & Narayanan, S. (1992). The processing of numerical versus verbal attribute information: A study using information patterns. Marketing Letters, 3, 201-208.
38. Viswanathan, M., & Narayanan, S. (1994). Comparative judgments of numerical and verbal attribute levels. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 3, 79-101.
39. Wallsten, T. S., & Barton, C. (1982). Processing probabilistic multidimensional information for decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 361-384.
40. Wallsten, T. S., Budescu, D. V., Erev, T., & Diederich, A. (1997). Evaluating and combining subjective probability estimates. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10, 243-268.
41. Wang, H. (1998). The impact of communication with probability phrases in auditing decisions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, National Taiwan University.
42. West, P. M., & Broniarczyk, S. M. (1998). Integrating multiple opinions: The role of aspiration level on consumer response to critic consensus. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 38-51.
43. Yalch, R. F., & Yalch, R. (1984). The effect of numbers on the route of persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 522-527.
44. Yates, J. F., & Curley, S. P. (1986). Contingency judgment: Primacy effects and attention decrement. Acta Psychologica, 62, 293-302.