Patient first: A patient sensitivity tool for an electronic health record implementation

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 112-117

  Wolf, Debra M ^a   Hartman, Loraine M ^b   Larue, Elizabeth M ^b   Arndt, Iris ^a  

^a St Margaret Memorial Hospital   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitude toward computers; Computerized patient record; Computers and computerization; Educational technology; Hospital; Nursing informatics; Patients; Perception; Teaching methods

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EDUCATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; IN SERVICE TRAINING; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; NURSING INFORMATICS; NURSING STAFF; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE;

HUMANS; INSERVICE TRAINING; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; NURSING INFORMATICS; NURSING RECORDS; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PROGRAM EVALUATION;

EID: 34247569432     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.NCN.0000263976.08307.56     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. HHS fact sheet-HIT report at-a-glance July 2004. Health and Human Services Web site. Available at: www.hhs.gov/news/press/2004pres/20040427a.html. Accessed November 30, 2005.
2. Regina SK. Psychology 30: human development: a curriculum guide for the secondary level. Saskatchewan Learning. 2002. Available at: http://www.sasked. gov.sk.ca/docs/social/psych30/Glossary.htm. Accessed November 30, 2005.
3. The Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia 2005. Available at: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/sensitivity. Accessed January 9, 2006.
4. Harris Poll. Almost three-quarters of all U.S. adults - an estimated 163 million - go online. May 12, 2005. Available at: http://www.harrisinteractive. com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=569. Accessed November 30, 2005.
5. U.S. Census Bureau. American FactFinder 2000 census. Available at: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/SAFFFacts?_event=&geo_id= 01000US&_geoContex. Accessed November 30, 2005.
6. U. S. Census Bureau. State and county quick facts 2000 census. Available at: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/42/4261000.html. Accessed November 30, 2005.
7. Gadd CS, Penrod LE. Dichotomy between physicians' and patients' attitudes regarding EMR use during outpatient encounters. Proc AMIA Symp. 2000:275-279.
8. Garrison GM, Bernard ME, Rasmussen NH. 21st-century health care: the effect of computer use by physicians on patient satisfaction at a family medicine clink. Fam Med. 2002;34(5):362-368.
9. Morin D, Tourigny A, Pelletier D, et al. Seniors' views on the use of electronic health records. Inform Prim Care. 2005;13(2):125-133.
10. Sciammanna CN, Diaz J, Myne P. Patient attitudes toward using computers to improve health services delivery. BMC Health Serv Res. 2002;2(1):19.
11. Berner ES, Savage GT, Houston TK, Williams ES, Crawford MA, Ray MN. Impact of patient feedback on residents' handheld computer use: a multi-site study. Medinfo. 2004;11(Pt 1):582-586.
12. Hsu J, Huang J, Fung V, Robertson N, Jimison H, Frankel R. Health information technology and physician-patient interactions: impact of computers on communication during outpatient primary care visits. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(4):474-480.
13. Zurita L. Patient opinion - EHR assessment from the users perspective. Medinfo. 2004;11(Pt 2):1333-1336.
14. Nahm R, Poston I. Measurement of the effects of an integrated, point-of-care computer system on quality of nursing documentation and patient satisfaction. Comput Nurs. 2000;18(5):220-229.
15. Simpson R. The softer side of technology: how it helps nursing care. Nurs Admin Q. 2004;28(4):302-305.
16. Gilmartin M. Humanism in health care service: the role of stakeholder management. Nurs Admin Q. 2001;25(3):24-36.
17. Layman E. Health informatics: ethical issues. Health Care Manag. 2003;22(1):2-15.
18. Dickerson P. 10 tips to help learning. J Nurses Staff Dev. 2003;19(5):240-246.
19. Donner CL, Levonian C, Slutsky P. Move to the head of the class: developing staff nurses as teachers. J Nurses Staff Dev. 2005;21(6):277-283.
20. Kaufman D. Applying educational theory in practice. BMJ. 2003;326(7382):213-216.
21. Morse JS, Oberer J, Dobbins J, Mitchell D. Understanding learning styles: implications for staff development educators. J Nurses Staff Dev. 1998;14(1):41-46.
22. Zapp L. Use of multiple teaching strategies in the staff development setting. J Nurses Staff Dev. 2001;17(4):206-212.
23. Nearly 2 million patients speak out on the quality of hospital care. February 3, 2003. Available at: http://www.pressganey.org/scripts/news.php? news_id=56. Accessed December 6, 2005.
24. Hart LB. Integrating technology and traditional teaching methods to stimulate different cognitive styles in a critical care course. J Nurses Staff Dev. 2000;16(1):31-33.
25. Shavinina LV. A new wave of innovations in psychology: high intellectual and creative educational multimedia technologies. Review of General Psychology. 2001;5(3):291-315.