Evaluation of online and on-site options for master's degree and post-master's certificate programs

Nurse Educator

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 73-77

  Mills, Andrew C ^a  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CERTIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CURRICULUM; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MALE; NURSE PRACTITIONER; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; ONLINE SYSTEM; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD; TEACHING; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CERTIFICATION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CURRICULUM; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; EDUCATION, DISTANCE; EDUCATION, NURSING, GRADUATE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MISSOURI; NURSE PRACTITIONERS; NURSING EDUCATION RESEARCH; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 34247513033     PISSN: 03633624     EISSN: 15389855     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.NNE.0000264326.10297.e7     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Mills AC. Creating Web-based, multimedia, and interactive courses for distance learning. Comput Nurs. 2000;18:125-131.
2. Mills AC, Hrubetz J. Strategic development of a master's program on the World Wide Web. J Prof Nurs. 2001;17:166-172.
3. Veney JE, Kaluzny AD. Evaluation and Decision Making for Health Services Programs. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1984.
4. Newman A. Measuring success in Web-based distance learning. EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research Bulletin. 2003:2-11.
5. Bata-Jones B, Avery MD. Teaching pharmacology to graduate nursing students: evaluation and comparison of Web-based and face-for-face methods. J Nurs Educ. 2004;43(4):185-189.
6. Buckley KM. Evaluation of classroom-based, Web-enhanced, and Web-based distance learning nutrition courses for undergraduate nursing. J Nurs Educ. 2003;42(8):367-370.
7. Gagne M, Shepherd M. Distance learning in accounting. THE J. 2001;28(9):58-63.
8. Glenn AS. A comparison of distance learning and traditional learning environments. Report to US Department of Education. May 2001.
9. Leasure AR, Davis L, Thievon SL. Comparison of student outcomes and preferences in a traditional vs. World Wide Web-based baccalaureate nursing research course. J Nurs Educ. 2002;39(4):149-154.
10. Rose MA, Frisby AJ, Hamlin MD, Jones SS. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a Web-based graduate epidemiology course. Comput Nurs. 2000;18(4):162-167.
11. Schulman AH, Sims RL. Learning in an on-line format versus an in-class format: an experimental study. THE J. 1999;26(11):54-57.
12. Woo MA, Kimmick JV. Comparison of Internet versus lecture instructional methods for teaching nursing research. J Prof Nurs. 2000;16(3):132-139.
13. Yucha C, Princen T. Insights learned from teaching pathophysiology on the World Wide Web. J Nurs Educ. 2000;39(2):68-72.
14. Zucker DM, Asselin M. Migrating to the Web: the transformation of a traditional RN to BS program. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2003;34(2):86-89.
15. Fredda J. Comparison of selected student outcomes for Internet- and campus-based instruction at the Fischler Graduate School of Education and Human Services. Fort Lauderdale-Davis, Fla: Nova Southeastern University; August 2000. Research and Planning Report 00-16.
16. Baldwin KM, Burns PG. Development and implementation of an online CNS program. Clin Nurse Spec. 2004;18(5):248-254.
17. Umble KE, Shay S, Sollecito W. An interdisciplinary MPH via distance learning: meeting the educational needs of practitioners. J Public Health Manag. 2003;9(2):123-135.
18. Phipps R. What's the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Report to the Institute for Higher Education Policy; April 1999. Available at: http://www.ihep.com. Accessed February 16, 2006.