Teaching college level content and reading comprehension skills simultaneously via an artificially intelligent adaptive computerized instructional system

Psychological Record

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 201-218

  Ray, Roger D ^a   Belden, Noelle ^a  

^a ROLLINS COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247503336     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03395572     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. ALEXANDER-TRAVIS, P., BELL, D., DALEY, J. W., DAVIS, A. P., DIBENEDETTO, M., FREEMAN, L. M., et al. (2002). REA's testbuster for the GRE (Test Preps). Piscataway, NJ: Research & Education Association.
2. BELDEN, N., MIRAGLIA, K., & RAY, R. D. (2003). Getting students to use adaptive tutorial services: Strategies, issues and outcomes. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, San Francisco, CA.
3. BUTTERFIELD, S., & HOUMANFAR, R. (2003). Self-paced interactive system of instruction (SPIN) & Psych-Al adaptive instruction: A systematic comparison. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, San Francisco, CA.
4. CACCAMISE, D., & SNYDER, L. (2005). Theory and pedagogical practices of text comprehension. Topics in Language Disorders, 25(1), 5-20.
5. CAMPBELL, D. T., & STANLEY, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 171-246). Chicago: Rand McNally.
6. CATANIA, A. C. (1998). Learning (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7. CHANG, K. E., SUNG, Y. T., & CHEN, S. F. (2001). Learning through computer-based concept mapping with scaffolding aid. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 21-33.
8. CHANG, K., SUNG, Y, & CHEN, I. (2002). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(1), 5-24.
9. CONARD, C. J., SPENCER, R. E., & SEMB, G. (1978). An analysis of student self-grading versus proctor grading in a personalized university course. Journal of Personalized Instruction, 3(1), 23-28.
10. ERLMER, P. A., & NEWBY, T. J. (1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 50-72.
11. ESTES, W. K. (1971). Reward in human learning: Theoretical issues and strategic choice points. In R. Glaser (Ed.), The nature of reinforcement (pp. 16-36). New York: Academic Press.
12. GRAY, P. (2002). Psychology (4th ed.). Gordonsville, VA: Worth Publishers.
13. HARLOW, H. F. (1949). The formation of learning sets. Psychological Review, 56, 51-65.
14. HAYES, S. C., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & ROCHE, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
15. JOHNSON, K., & STREET, E. M. (2004). The Morningside Model of generative instruction. Concord, MA: Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies.
16. JONASSEN, D. H. (1996). Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking. Eaglewoods, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
17. KAROLY, P. (1993). Mechanisms of self-regulation: A systems view. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 23-47.
18. 2, Inc.
19. KELLER, F. S. (1968). "Goodbye, teacher...". Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 79-89.
20. KINTSCH, W. (1998) Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. KINTSCH, E. (2005). Comprehension theory as a guide for the design of thoughtful questions. Topics in Language Disorders, 25(1), 51-64.
22. LARKIN, J. H., & CHABAY, R. W. (1992). Computer-assisted instruction and intelligent tutoring systems: Shared goals and complementary approaches. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
23. LAYNG, T. V. J., STIKELEATHER, G., & TWYMAN, J. S. (2004). Scientific formative evaluation: The role of individual learners in generating and predicting successful educational outcomes. In R. Subotnick & H. Walberg (Eds.), The scientific basis of educational productivity. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
24. LAYNG, T. V. J., TWYMAN, J. S., & STIKELEATHER, G. (2003). Headsprout Early Reading™: Reliably teaches children to read. Behavioral Technology Today, 3, 7-20.
25. LAYNG, T. V. J., TWYMAN, J. S., & STIKELEATHER, G. (2004). Engineering discovery learning: The contingency adduction of some precursors of textual responding in a beginning reading program. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 20, 99-109.
26. MACARTHUR, C. A., & HAYNES, J. B. (1995). Student assistant for learning from text (SALT): A hypermedia reading aid. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 150-159.
27. MAIER, S. E., SELIGMAN, M. E. P., & SOLOMON, R. L (1969). Pavlovian fear conditioning and learned helplessness: Effects on escape and avoidance behavior of (a) the CS-US contingency and (b) the independence of the US and voluntary responding. In B. A. Campbell & R. M Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 299-342). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
28. MARKLE, S. M., & TIEMANN, R W. (1970). "Behavioral" analysis of "cognitive" content. Educational Technology, 10(1), 41-45.
29. MARTINSON, T. H. (2003). Master the GRE CAT2004 (Academic Test Preparation Series). Lawrenceville, NJ: ARCO, Thomson Learning, Inc.
30. MILLER, J. M., GOODYEAR-ORWAT, A., & MALOTT, R. W. (1996). The effects of intensive, extensive, structured study on GRE scores. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6(4), 369-379.
31. MILLER, L. K., & WEAVER, F. H. (1976). A behavioral technology for producing concept formation in university students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9(3), 289-300.
32. MILLER, L. K., WEAVER, F. H., & SEMB, G. (1974). A procedure for maintaining student progress in a personalized university course. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7(1), 87-91.
33. NOVAK, J. D., & GOWAN, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University.
34. PÉREZ-GONZÁLEZ, L A., SPRADLIN, J. E., & SAUNDERS, K. J. (2000). Learning-set outcome in second-order conditional discriminations. The Psychological Record, 50(3), 429-442.
35. PHILLIPS, V., & BOND, C. (2004). Undergraduates' experiences of critical thinking. Higher Education Research & Development, 23, (3), 277-294.
36. RAY, R. D. (1995a). MediaMatrix: An authoring system for adaptive hypermedia teaching-learning resource libraries. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 7(1) 44-68.
37. RAY, R. D. (1995b). A behavioral systems approach to adaptive computerized instructional design. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27(2), 293-296.
38. RAY, R. D. (2000). Multimodality concept maps and video documentary reconstructions: New uses for adaptive multimedia in learning. In L. Lloyd (Ed.), Teaching with technology: Rethinking tradition (pp. 347-359). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
39. RAY, R. D. (2004). Adaptive computerized educational systems: A case study. In D. Moran & R. Mallott (Eds.), Evidence-based educational methods (pp. 143-170). San Diego, CA: Elsevier, Academic Press.
40. RICE, G. E. (1994). Examining constructs in reading comprehension using two presentation modes: Paper vs. computer. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11, 153-178.
41. ROBINSON, A., & KATZMAN, J. (2001). Cracking the SAT (2002 Ed). New York: The Princeton Review, Random House Inc.
42. SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative.
43. SKINNER, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24(2), 86-97.
44. SKINNER, B. R (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Macmillan.
45. SOWA, J. F. (1984). Conceptual structures: Information processing in mind and machine. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
46. SPENCER, R. E., & SEMB, G. (1978). Giving students the opportunity to increase unit size: A performance-based system for personalized instruction. Journal of Personalized Instruction, 3(2), 76-80.
47. TERRACE, H. S. (1963). Discrimination learning with and without "errors." Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 1-27.
48. TIEMANN, P. W., & MARKLE, S. M. (1990). Effects of varying interactive strategies provided by computer-based tutorials for a software application program. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 3(2), 48-64.
49. VARGAS, E. A., & VARGAS, J. S. (1992). Programmed instruction and teaching machines. In R. R West & L. Hamerlynch (Eds.), Designs for excellence in education: The legacy of B. F. Skinner (pp. 33-69). Longmont, CO: Sopris.
50. VERPLANCK, W. S. (1992). A brief introduction to the Word Associate Test. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 10, 97-123.
51. YOURGRAU, T. (Sr. Producer) (1990). Discovering psychology. WGBH Boston & American Psychological Association.