Theory and pedagogical practices of text comprehension

Topics in Language Disorders

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 5-20

  Caccamise, Donna ^a   Snyder, Lynn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Comprehension theory; Construction integration model; Latent semantic analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 18144369311     PISSN: 02718294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00011363-200501000-00003     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Barclay, J. R., Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., McCarrell, N. S., & Nltsch, K. (1974). Comprehension and semantic flexibility. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 471-481.
2. Barr, A., & Feigenbaum, E. A. (1982) The handbook of artificial intelligence (Vol. II). Los Altos, CA: William Kaufmann, Inc.
3. Barsalou, L. W. (1993). Flexibility, structure, and linguistic vagary in concepts: Manifestations of a compositional system of perceptual symbols. In: A. C. Collins, S. E. Gathercole, & M. A. Conway (Eds.), Theories of memories, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Barshi, I. (1997). Message length and misunderstandings in aviation communication: Linguistic properties and cognitive constraints. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder.
5. Bransford, J. D., Barclay, J. R., & Franks, J. J. (1972). Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 193-209.
6. Britton, B. K., & Gulgoz, S. (1991). Using Kintsch's computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 329-345.
7. Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning remembering, and understanding. In J. Flavell & E. M. Markman (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Cognitive development (4th ed., pp. 515-629). New York: Wiley.
8. Catts, H. W., & Kamhi, A. G. (1999). Language and reading disabilities. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
9. Deshler, D. D., Ellis, E. S., & Lenz, B. K. (1996). Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities: Strategies and methods. Denver, CO: Love.
10. Duke, N., Pressley, M., & Hilden, K. (2004). Difficulties with reading comprehension. In C. A. Stone, E. Silliman, B. Ehren, & K. Apel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy (pp. 501-520). New York: Guilfbrd Press.
11. Ericsson, A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211-245.
12. Estes, W. K. (1986). Array models for category learning. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 500-549.
13. Farber, J. G., & Klein, E. R. (1999). Classroom-based assessment of a collaborative intervention program with kindergarten and first-grade students. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 83-91.
14. Fischer, B., & Glanzer, M. (1986). Short-term storage and the processing of cohesion during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 431-460.
15. Franzke, M., Kintsch, E., Caccamise, D., & Johnson, N. (2004). Summary street comprehension support for reading and writing. Manuscript submitted for publication.
16. Gernsbacher, M. A., & Faust, M. E. (1991). The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 245-262.
17. Gillam, R. B., & German, B. K. (2004). Language and discourse contributions to word recognition and text Interpretation: Implications of a dynamic systems perspective. In E. R. Silliman & L. C. Wilkinson (Eds.), Language and literacy learning in schools (pp. 63-97). New York: Guilford Press.
18. Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
19. Glanzer, M., Fischer, B., & Dorfman, D. (1984). Short-term storage In reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 467-486.
20. Goetz, E. T., Anderson, R. C., & Schallert, D. L. (1981). Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 369-385.
21. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological experimentation with synthetic visible speech. Behavior Review, 101, 371-395.
22. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 375-395.
23. Hadley, P., Simmerman, A., Long, M., & Luna, M. (2000). Facilitating language development for inner-city children: Experimental evaluation of a collaborrative, classroom-based intervention. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 31(3), 280-295.
24. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528-551.
25. Katz, J. J., & Fodor, J. A. (1963). The structure of a semantic theory. Language, 39, 170-210.
26. Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Kintsch, W. (1993). Information accretion and reduction in text processing: Inferences. Discourse Processes, 16, 193-202.
28. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension; A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: University Press.
29. Kintsch, W., & Keenan, J. M. (1973). Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 257-274.
30. Kintsch, E., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Strategies to promote active learning from text: Individual differences In background knowledge. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 2, 141-151.
31. Kintsch, W., & Mannes, S. M. (1987). Generating scripts from memory. In E. van der Meer & J. Hoffmann (Eds.), Knowledge-aided information processing (pp. 61-80). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
32. Kintsch, W., & Welsch, D. M. (1991). The construction-integration model: A framework for studying memory for text. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennett B. Murdock (pp. 367-385). Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.
33. Landauer, T., & Dumais, S. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
34. Long, D. L., Oppy, B. J., & Seely, M. R. (1994). Individual differences in the time course of inferential processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1456-1470.
35. Mannes, S. M., & Kintsch, W. (1987). Knowledge organization and text organization. Cognition and Instruction, 4, 91-115.
36. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Spreading activation versus compound cue accounts of priming: Mediated priming revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1155-1172.
37. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1995). The minimalist hypothesis: Direction for research. In C. Weaver, C. Fletcher, & S. Mannes (Eds.), Discourse comprehension: Strategies and processing revisited. Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 97-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, prior knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1-43.
39. Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227-234.
40. Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision. McGraw Hill: New York.
41. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magic number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 53(2), 81-97.
42. Moravcsik, J. E., & Kintsch, W. (1993). Writing quality, reading skills, and domain knowledge as factors In text comprehension. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 47, 360-374.
43. Murdock, B. B. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review, 89, 609-626.
44. National Center for Education Statistics. (2004). National assessment of educational progress. The nation's report card: Reading highlights 2003 (p. 452). Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
45. National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
46. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehensionfostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 117-175.
47. Pressley, M., & Hilden, K. (2004). Toward more ambitious comprehension instruction. In E. R. Silliman & L. C. Wilkinson (Eds.), Language and literacy learning in schools (pp. 151-174). New York: Guilford Press.
48. Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science In the Public Interest, 2, 31-74.
49. Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2002, March). How should reading be taught? Scientific American, 85-91.
50. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClellan, J. L. (1986). Parallel and distributed processing (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. Schank, R. C. (1982). Dynamic memory: A theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
53. Schneider, W., Korkel, J., &Weinert, F. E. (1989). Domain specific knowledge and memory performance: A comparison of high and low-aptitude children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 306-312.
54. Silliman, E. R., Wilkinson, L. C., & Brea-Spahn, M. R. (2004). Policy and practice imperatives for language and literacy learning: Who will be left behind. In E. R. Silliman & L. C. Wilkinson (Eds.), Language and literacy learning in schools (pp. 3-38). New York: Guilford Press.
55. Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981) Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56. Sternberg, R. J. (1987). Most vocabulary is learned from context. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 89-106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. Till, R. E., Mross, E. E., & Kintsch, W. (1988). Time course of priming for associate and inference words in discourse context. Memory and Cognition, 16, 283-299.
58. Underwood, T., & Pearson, P. D. (2004). Teaching struggling adolescent readers to comprehend what they read. In T. L. Jetton & J. A. Dole (Eds.), Adolescent literacy research and practice (pp. 35-61). New York: Gullford Press.
59. van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
60. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61. Whitney, P., Budd, D., Bramucci, R. S., & Crane, R. S. (1995). On babies, bathwater, and schemata: Are consideration of top-down processes In comprehension. Discourse Process, 20, 135-166.