Tradeoffs involved in site selection and foraging in a wolf spider: Effects of substrate structure and predation risk

Oikos

Volumn 116, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 853-863

  Rypstra, Ann L ^a   Schmidt, Jason M ^a   Reif, Brant D ^a   DeVito, Jill ^a   Persons, Matthew H ^b  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; CHEMICAL CUE; FOOD WEB; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; PREDATION RISK; PREY CAPTURE; PREY PREFERENCE; SITE SELECTION; SPIDER; SUBSTRATE PREFERENCE;

ANIMALIA; ARANEAE; HOGNA; HOGNA HELLUO; LYCOSIDAE; PARDOSA; PARDOSA MILVINA;

EID: 34247397547     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15622.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Anderson, J. F. 1974. Responses to starvation in the spiders Lycosa lenta Hentz and Filistata hibernalis Hentz Ecology 55: 576 585.
2. Anonymous 2005. JMP 5.1, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
3. Balfour, R. A. et al. 2003. Ontogenetic shifts in competitive interactions and intra-guild predation between two wolf spider species Ecol. Entomol. 28: 25 30.
4. Barnes, M. C. et al. 2002. The effect of predator chemical cue age on antipredator behavior in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae) J. Insect Behav. 15: 269 281.
5. Bell, R. et al. 2006. The effect of predator hunger on chemically-mediated antipredator responses and survival in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina Ethology 112: 903 910.
6. Brown, J. S. 1999. Vigilance, patch use and habitat selection: foraging under predation risk Evol. Ecol. Res. 1: 49 71.
7. Brown, J. S. et al. 1999. The Ecology of fear: optimal foraging game theory, and trophic interactions J. Mammal. 80: 385 399.
8. Dondale, C. D. and Redner, J. H. 1990. The insects and arachnids of Canada and Alaska (Araneae: Lycosidae, Pisauridae, and Oxyopidae). - Dept Agric. Can.
9. Finke, D. L Denno, R. F. 2002. Intraguild predation diminished in complex-structured vegetation: implications for prey suppression Ecology 83: 643 652.
10. Folz, H. C. et al. 2006. Effects of predation risk on vertical habitat use and foraging of Pardosa milvina Ethology 112: 1152 1158.
11. Givens, R. P. 1978. Dimorphic foraging strategies of a salticid spider (Phidippus audax) Ecology 59: 309 321.
12. Halaj, J. Wise, D. H. 2001. Terrestrial trophic cascades: how much do they trickle? Am. Nat. 157: 262 281.
13. Heck, K. L. Crowder, L. B. 1991. Habitat structure and predator-prey interactions in vegetated aquatic systems Bell, S. S. Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. Chapman and Hall 281 295.
14. Hernandez, L. Laundré, J. W. 2005. Foraging in the 'landscape of fear' and its implications for habitat use and diet quality of elk Cervus elaphus and bison Bison bison Wildlife Biol. 11: 215 220.
15. Hlivko, J. T. Rypstra, A. L. 2003. Spiders reduce herbivory: non-lethal effects of spiders on the consumption of soybean leaves by beetle pests Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 96: 914 919.
16. Jakob, E. J. et al. 1996. Estimating fitness: a comparison of body condition indices Oikos 77: 61 67.
17. Kortet, R. Hedrick, A. 2004. Detection of the spider predator, Hololena nedra by naïve juvenile field crickets (Gryllus integer) using indirect cues Behaviour 141: 1189 1196.
18. Langellotto, G. A. Denno, R. F. 2004. Responses of invertebrate natural enemies to complex structured habitats: a meta-analytical synthesis Oecologia 139: 1 10.
19. Laundré, J. W. et al. 2001. Wolves, elk, and bison: reestablishing the "landscape of fear" in Yellowstone National Park Can. J. Zool. 79: 1401 1409.
20. Lehmann, L. M. et al. 2004. The influence of predator sex on chemically mediated antipredator response in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae) Ethology 110: 323 339.
21. Marshall, S. D. Rypstra, A. L. 1999. Patterns in the distribution of two wolf spiders (Araneae; Lycosidae) in two soybean agroecosystems Environ. Entomol. 28: 1052 1059.
22. Marshall, S. D. et al. 2000. A test for differential colonization and competitive ability in two generalist predators Ecology 81: 3341 3349.
23. Marshall, S. D. et al. 2002. A comparative study of phenology and daily activity patterns in the wolf spiders Pardosa milvina and Hogna helluo in soybean agroecosystems in southwestern Ohio (Araneae; Lycosidae) J. Arachnol. 30: 503 510.
24. Marshall, S. D. et al. 2006. Two ecologically-divergent generalist predators have different responses to landscape fragmentation Oikos 114: 241 248.
25. McNett, B. J. Rypstra, A. L. 2000. Habitat selection in a large orb-weaving spider: vegetational complexity determines site selection and distribution Ecol. Entomol. 25: 423 432.
26. Moya-Laraño, J. et al. 2003. Intriguing compensation by adult female spiders for food limitation experienced as juveniles Oikos 101: 539 548.
27. Nakamura, K. 1968. The ingestion in wolf spiders. I. Capacity of gut of Lycosa pseudoannulata Res. Popul. Ecol. 10: 45 53.
28. Nakamura, K. 1972. The ingestion in wolf spiders II. The expression of degree of hunger and amount of ingestion in relation to spider's hunger Res. Popul. Ecol. 14: 82 96.
29. Persons, M. H. et al. 2001. Wolf spider predator avoidance tactics and survival in the presence of diet-associated predator cues (Araneae; Lycosidae) Anim. Behav. 61: 43 51.
30. Persons, M. H. et al. 2002. Costs and benefits of chemically-mediated anti-predator behaviour in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae) Behav. Ecol. 13: 386 392.
31. Rypstra, A. L. Samu, F. 2005. Size dependent intraguild predation and cannibalism in coexisting wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) J. Arachnol. 33: 390 397.
32. Rypstra, A. L. et al. 1999. Architectural modifications of agricultural habitats and their impact on the spider inhabitants J. Arachnol. 27: 371 377.
33. Samu, F. et al. 2003. Foraging in agricultural fields: local 'sit-and-move' strategy scales up to risk-averse habitat use in a wolf spider Anim. Behav. 66: 939 947.
34. Schmitz, O. J. 2005. Scaling from plot experiments to landscapes: studying grasshoppers inform forest ecosystem management Oecologia 145: 225 234.
35. Schmitz, O. J. et al. 2000. Trophic cascades in terrestrial systems: a review of the effects of carnivore removals on plants Am. Nat. 155: 141 153.
36. Schofield, P. J. 2003. Habitat selection of two gobies (Microgobius gulosus, Gobiosoma robustum): influence of structural complexity, competitive interactions and presence of a predator J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 288: 125 137.
37. Snyder, W. E. Wise, D. H. 2000. Antipredator behavior of spotted cucumber beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in response to predators that pose varying risks Environ. Entomol. 29: 35 42.
38. Uetz, G. W. 1991. Habitat structure and spider foraging Bell, S. S. Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. Chapman and Hall 325 348.
39. Walker, S. E. et al. 1999. The effects of hunger on locomotory behaviour in two species of wolf spider (Araneae, Lycosidae) Anim. Behav. 58: 515 520.
40. Werner, E. E. et al. 1985. An experimental test of the effects of predator risk on habitat use in fish Ecology 64: 1540 1548.
41. Wilder, S. M. et al. 2005. The effects of moisture and heat on the efficacy of chemical cues used in predator detection by the wolf spider Parodsa milvina (Araneae, Lycosidae) J. Arachnol. 33: 857 861.
42. Williams, J. L. et al. 2001. Sex based differences in antipredator behavior in the spotted cucumber beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Environ. Entomol. 30: 327 332.
43. Wise, D. H. 1993. Spiders in ecological webs. Cambridge University Press.
44. Wise, D. H. et al. 2006. Using stable isotopes to reveal shifts in prey consumption by generalist predators Ecol. Appl. 16: 865 876.
45. Young, O. P. Edwards, G. B. 1990. Spiders in United States field crops and their potential effect on crop pests J. Arachnol. 18: 1 27.