Positive patch test reaction to triethanolamine (TEA) - Contamination by other alkonolamines or irritant reactions?;Positive epikutantestreaktion auf triethanolamin (TEA) bei metallarbeitern - Reaktion auf verunreinigung durch andere alkanolamine oder irritative reaktion?

Dermatologie in Beruf und Umwelt

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 20-27

  Fartasch, M ^a,b,d   Breuer, D ^c  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

^c Berufsgenossenschaftliches Institut fur Arbeitsschutz   (Germany)

^d INSTITUT DER RUHR UNIVERSITÄT BOCHUM IPA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Alkanolamine; Contamination; Irritant reactions; Sh; Triethanolamine

Indexed keywords

ALKANOLAMINE; ALLERGEN; DIETHANOLAMINE; ETHANOLAMINE; IRRITANT AGENT; TRIETHANOLAMINE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CHEMOSENSITIZATION; HUMAN; ION PAIR CHROMATOGRAPHY; METAL INDUSTRY; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PATCH TEST; SKIN DISEASE; WORKER;

EID: 34247329738     PISSN: 1438776X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5414/dbp55020     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alomar A., L. Condo-Salazar, C. Romaguera: Occupational dermatosis from cutting oils. Contact Dermatitis 12, 129-138 (1985).
2. Angelini G., C.L. Meneghini: Dermatitis in engineers due to synthetic coolants. Contact Dermatitis 3, 219-220 (1977).
3. Batten T.L., R.A. Wakeel, W.S. Douglas, C. Evans, M.I. White, R. Moody, A.D. Ormerod: Contact dermatitis from the old formula E45 cream. Contact Dermatitis 30, 159-161 (1994).
4. Blum A., G. Lischka: Allergic contact dermatitis from mono-, di- and triethanolamine. Contact Dermatitis 36, 166 (1997).
5. Boman A., J.E. Wahlberg, S. Fregert: Sensitizing potential of triethanolamine studied with the guinea pig maximization test method. Dermatosen Beruf Umwelt 41, 58-59 (1993).
6. Brasch J., T. Henseler, W. Aberer, G. Bauerle, P.J. Frosch, T. Fuchs, V. Funfstuck, G. Kaiser, G.G. Lischka, B. Pilz et al.: Reproducibility of patch tests. A multicenter study of synchronous left- versus right-sided patch tests by the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 31, 564-591 (1994).
7. Brasch J., M. Weichhenthal, C. Szliska, H. Loffler, P. Koch, J. Grabbe, V. Mahler, B. Kreilgard, U. Hoeck, German Contact Dermatitis Research Group: Positive patch test reactions to nickel sulphate are not modified by neighbouring negative fragance patch tests. A multicenter-study by the German contact dermatitis research group. Acta Derm. Venereol. 86, 345-347 (2006).
8. Brinkmeier T., J. Geier, J.P. Lepqittevin, P.J. Frosch: Patch test reactions to Biobans in metalworkers are often weak and not reproducible. Contact Dermatitis 47, 27-31 (2002).
9. Breuer D., C. Lützenkirchen, M. Böckler, T. Rabente: Alkanolamine in wassermischbaren Kühlschmierstoffen. Gefahrstoffe Reinhalt. Luft 64, 473-479 (2004).
10. Bruze M., M. Isaksson, A. Dooms-Goossens: The influence of patch tests with clobetasol propionate on adjacent patch test reactions. Contact Dermatitis 32, 167-170 (1995).
11. Diepgen T.L., M. Fartasch, O.P. Hornstein: Kriterien zur Beurteilung der atopischen Hautdiathese. Dermatosen 39, 79-83 (1991).
12. Diepgen T.L, W. Sauerbrei, M. Fartasch: Development and validation of diagnostic score for atopic dermatitis incorporating criteria of data quality and practical usefulness. J. Clin. Epidemiology 49, 1031-1038 (1996).
13. Fartasch M., D. Breuer: Positive Testreaktion (TR) gegen Triethanolamin (TEA) bei Metallarbeitern - Reaktion auf Verunreinigung durch Diethanolamin (DEA)/Monoethanolamin (MEA)? Dermatologie in Beruf und Umwelt 53, 139 (2005).
14. Fartasch M., D. Breuer: Triethanolamin (TEA): a relevant allergen in metalworking fluids (MWF)? Contact Dermatitis 55 (Suppl. 1), 39-40 (2006).
15. Geier J., W. Uter, C. Pirker, P.J. Frosch: Patch testing with the irritant sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) is useful in interpreting weak reactions to contact allergens as allergic or irritant. Contact Dermatits 48, 99-107 (2003).
16. Geier J., H. Lessmann, A. Schnuch, W. Uter: Contact sensitizations in metalworkers with occupational dermatitis exposed to water-based metalworking fluids: results of the research project "FaST". Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 77, 543-551 (2004).
17. Geier J., H. Lessmann, H. Dickel, P.J. Frosch, P. Koch, D. Becker, U. Jappe, W. Aberer, A. Schnuch, W. Uter: Patch test results with the metalworking fluid series of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG). Contact Dermatitis 51, 118-130 (2004).
18. Geier J., H. Lessmann, A. Schnuch, W. Uter: Diagnostic quality of the patch test preparation monoethanolamine 2% pet. Contact Dermatitis 52, 171-173 (2005).
19. Kaup U., G. Heyer, J. Schwalb, B. Schleser, D. Breuer: Diethanolamin in Kühlschmierstoffkonzentrationen. Gefahrstoffe - Reinhalt Luft 57, 417-421 (1997).
20. Loffler H., D. Becker, J. Brasch, J. Geier: Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG). Br. J. Dermatol. 152, 709-719 (2005).
21. MAK- und BAT-Werte-Liste 2005: DFG Mitteilung 41. II Stoffliste. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 2005.
22. MAK- und BAT-Werte-Liste 2006: DFG Mitteilung 42. II Stoffliste und Anhang V. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 2006, 123.
23. Niklasson B., B. Björkner, K. Sundberg: Contact allergy to a fatty acid ester component of cutting fluids. Contact Dermatitis 28, 265-267 (1993).
24. Schnuch A., W. Aberer, M. Agathos, J. Brasch, P.J. Frosch, T.H. Fuchs, G. Richter für die Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe: Leitlinien der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft (DDG) zur Durchführung des Epikutanttests mit Kontaktallergenen. Hautarzt 52, 864-866 (2001).
25. Schnuch A., H. Lessmann, K.H. Schulz, D. Becker, T.L. Diepgen, H. Drexler, S. Erdmann, M. Fartasch, H. Greim, H. Greim, P. Kricke-Helling, R. Merget, H. Merk, D. Nowak, A. Rothe, G. Stropp, W. Uter, G. Wallenstein: When should a substance be designated as sensitizing for the skin ("sh") or for the airways ("sa")? Pneumology 56, 304-308 (2002).
26. Schnuch A.: Wann soll ein Arbeitsstoff als sensibilisierend für die Haut ("Sh") oder für die Atemwege ("Sa") markiert werden? Kriterien der "Senatskommission zur Prüfung gesundheitsschädlicher Arbeitsstoffe" der DFG. Allergo. J. 11, 86-96 (2002).
27. Simonetti V., B.M. Manzini, S. Seidenari: Patch testing with nickel sulfate: comparison between 2 nickel sulfate preparations and 2 different test sites on the back. Contact Dermatitis 39, 187-191 (1998).
28. Wahlberg J.E., A. Boman: Alkanolamines - sensitizing capacity, cross-reactivity and review of patch test reactivity. Dermatosen Beruf Umwelt 44, 222-224 (1996).