Alkanolamines - Sensitizing capacity, cross reactivity and review of patch test reactivity

Dermatosen in Beruf und Umwelt

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 222-224

  Wahlberg, Jan E ^a,b   Boman, Anders ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR WORKING LIFE   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

alkanolamines, allergenicity, cross reactivity; diethanolamine; monoethanolamine; triethanolamine

Indexed keywords

ALKANOLAMINE; DIETHANOLAMINE; ETHANOLAMINE; TRIETHANOLAMINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS REACTION; GUINEA PIG; NONHUMAN; PATCH TEST; SENSITIZATION;

EID: 0029824910     PISSN: 03432432     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Alomar, A., Conde-Salazar, L., Romaguera, C., Occupational Dermatoses from Cutting Oils. Contact Derm. 12, 129-138 (1985)
2. De Boer, E. M., van Ketel, W. G., Bruynzeel, D. P., Dermatoses in Metal Workers (II). Allergic Contact Dermatitis. Contact Derm. 20, 208-286 (1989)
3. Boman, A., Wahlberg, J. E., Fregert, S., Sensitizing Potential of Triethanolamine Studied with the Guinea Pig Maximization Test Method. Dermatosen 41, 58-59 (1993)
4. Bruze, M., Hradil, E., Eriksohn, I.-L., et al. Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis from Alkanolaminoborates in Metalworking Fluids. Contact Derm. 32, 24-27 (1995)
5. Fisher, A. A., Pascher, F., Kanof, N. B., Allergic Contact Dermatitis Due to Ingredients in Vehicles. Arch. Derm. 104, 286-290 (1971)
6. Fregert, S., Hjorth, N., Results of Standard Patch Tests with Substances Abandoned. Contact Derm. Newsletter 5, 85-86 (1969)
7. Knudsen, B. B., Wahlberg, J. E., Andersen, I. et al., Classification of Contact Allergens. Proposal for Criteria. Dermatosen 41, 5-9 (1993)
8. Knudsen, B. B., Flyvholm, M.-A., Wahlberg, J. E. et al., Classification of Contact Allergens. Evaluation of" Previously Proposed Criteria. Dermatosen 43, 113-118 (1995)
9. Meneghini, C. L., Rantuccio, F., Lomuto, M., Additives, Vehicles and Active Drugs of Topical Medicaments as Causes of Delayed-type Allergic Dermatitis. Dermatologica 143, 137-147 (1971).
10. Pasche-Koo, F., Piletta, P.-A., Hunziker, N. et al., High Sensitization Rate to Emulsifiers in Patients with Leg Ulcers. Contact Derm. 31, 226-228 (1994)
11. Scheuer, B., Kontaktallergie durch Triäthanolamin. Hautarzt 34, 126-129 (1983)
12. Schnuch, A., Arnold, R., Bahmer, F. et al., Epikutantestung mit der Salbengrundlagenreihe. Ergebnisse des Informationsverbundes Dermatologischer Kliniken (IVDK). Dermatosen 41, 176-183 (1993)
13. Sollenberg, J., Hansén, E., Isotachophoretic Determination of Amines from Work-room Air. J. Chromatogr. 390, 133-140 (1987)
14. Speight, E. E., Beck, M. H., Eawrence, C. M., Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis Due to 3-Dimethylaminopropylamine. Contact Derm. 28, 49-50 (1993)
15. Tosti, A., Guerra, E., Morelli, R. et al., Prevalence and Sources of Sensitization to Emulsifiers: A clinical study. Contact Derm. 23, 68-72 (1990)
16. Uter, W., Schaller, S., Bahmer, F. et al., Contact Allergy in Metal Workers. A One-year Analysis Based on Data Collected by the Information Network of Dermatology Clinics (IVDK) in Germany. Dermatosen 41, 220-227 (1993)
17. Wahlberg, J. E., Boman, A., Guinea Pig Maximization Test, in: Contact Allergy Predictive Tests in Guinea Pigs. Current Problems in Dermatology, K. E. Anderson, H. I. Maibach (eds.), Vol. 14, pp. 59-106. Karger, Basel (1985)