Leaf- and stand-level responses of a forested mesocosm to independent manipulations of temperature and vapor pressure deficit

New Phytologist

Volumn 174, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 614-625

  Barron Gafford, Greg A ^a   Grieve, Katherine A ^b   Murthy, Ramesh ^c  

^a University of Arizona   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Biosphere 2 Laboratory; Conductance; Net ecosystem carbon exchange; Photosynthesis; Populus deltoides; Sap flux; Scaling

Indexed keywords

WATER;

CANOPY EXCHANGE; CARBON DIOXIDE; DECIDUOUS TREE; GAS EXCHANGE; LEAF; MESOCOSM; NET ECOSYSTEM EXCHANGE; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; STAND DYNAMICS; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; TEMPERATURE EFFECT; TRANSPIRATION; VAPOR PRESSURE;

ARTICLE; ASPEN; ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT LEAF; SWEATING; TEMPERATURE; TREE;

ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT TRANSPIRATION; POPULUS; TEMPERATURE; TREES; WATER;

POPULUS DELTOIDES;

EID: 34247324425     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02035.x     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. 2 partial pressure. Journal of Experimental Botany 52: 2235-2238.
2. 2] stimulates stand-level respiration and rhizodeposition of carbohydrates, accelerates soil nutrient depletion, yet stimulates above and belowground biomass production. Global Change Biology 11: 1220-1233.
3. Bassman JH, Zwier JC. 1991. Gas exchange characteristics of Populus trichocarpa, Populus deltoides, and Populs trichocarpa x P. deltoides clones. Tree Physiology 8: 145-159.
4. Bassow SL, Bazzaz FA. 1998. How environmental conditions affect canopy leaf-level photosynthesis in four deciduous tree species. Ecology 79: 2660-2675.
5. Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM. 2003. Stomatal closure during leaf dehydration, correlation with other leaf physiological traits. Plant Physiology 132: 2166-2173.
6. von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD. 1981. Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153: 376-387.
7. Chen JQ, Falk M, Euskirchen EUKTP, Suchanek TH, Ustin SL, Bond BJ, Brosofske KD, Phillips N, Bi RC. 2002. Biophysical controls of carbon flows in three successional Douglas-fir stands based on eddy-covariance measurements. Tree Physiology 22: 169-177.
8. Cienciala E, Lindroth A, Cermak J, Hallgren JE, Kucera J. 1992. Assessment of transpiration estimates for Picea abies trees during a growing season. Trees 6: 121-127.
9. Clearwater MJ, Meinzer FC, Andrade JL, Goldstein G, Holbrook NM. 1999. Potential errors in measurement of nonuniform sap flow using heat dissipation probes. Tree Physiology 19: 681-687.
10. 2 and elevated temperature on growth, photosynthesis and respiration in Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant, Cell & Environment 21: 427-435.
11. Day ME. 2000. Influence of temperature and leaf-to-air vapor pressure deficit on net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance in red spruce (Picea rubens). Tree Physiology 20: 57-63.
12. DeLucia EH, Moore DJ, Hamilton JG, Thomas RB, Springer CJ, Norby RJ. 2005. The changing role of forests in the global carbon cycle: responding to elevated carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. In: Lal R, Duxbury J, Steward BA, Hansen DO, eds. Climate change and global food security. New York, NY, USA: CRC Press, 179-214.
13. Dempster WF. 1999. Biosphere 2 engineering design. Ecological Engineering 13: 31-42.
14. Eamus D. 2003. How does water balance affect net primary productivity of woody ecosystems? Functional Plant Biology 30: 187-205.
15. Edwards WRN Becker P Eermak J. 1996. A unified nomenclature for sap flow measurements. Tree Physiology 17: 65-67.
16. 2 concentration modifies the transpiration response of Populus deltoides to drought and vapor pressure deficit. Tree Physiology 24: 1137-1145.
17. 3 plants: Stomatal and nonstomatal limitations revisited. Annals of. Botany 89: 183-189.
18. Gonzalez-Rodriguez AM Morales D Jimenez MS. 2001. Gas exchange characteristics of a Canarian laurel forest tree species (Laurus azorica) in relation to environmental conditions and leaf canopy position. Tree Physiology 21: 1039-1045.
19. Granier A. 1987. Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas-fir stand by means of sap flow measurements. Tree Physiology 3: 309-320.
20. Granier A Breda N. 1996. Modelling canopy conductance and stand transpiration of an oak forest from sap flow measurements. Annals of Scientific Forestry 53: 537-546.
21. 2 climate experiment. Journal of Climate 10: 662-686.
22. Griffin KL Turnbull M Murthy R. 2002a. Canopy position affects the temperature response of leaf respiration in Populus deltoides. New Phytologist 154: 609-619.
23. Griffin KL Turnbull M Murthy R Lin G Adams J Farnsworth B Mahato T Bazin G Potasnak M Berry JA. 2002b. Leaf respiration is differentially affected by leaf vs. stand-level night-time warming. Global Change Biology 8: 479-485.
24. Guevara-Escobar A Edwards WRN Morton RH Kemp PD Mackay AD. 2000. Tree water use and rainfall partitioning in a mature poplar-pasture system. Tree Physiology 20: 97-106.
25. 2 enrichment. Plant, Cell & Environment 25: 379-393.
26. 2, temperature, precipitation, and ozone on carbon and water cycles of an upland-oak forest: incorporating experimental results into model simulations. Global Change Biology 11: 1402-1423.
27. Hogg EH Hurdle PA. 1997. Sap flow in trembling aspen: implications for stomatal responses to vapor pressure deficit. Tree Physiology 17: 501-509.
28. Horton JL Kolb TE Hart SC. 2001. Leaf gas exchange characteristics differ among Sonoran Desert riparian tree species. Tree Physiology 21: 233-241.
29. Huxman TE Cable JM Ignace DD Eilts JA English NB Weltzin J Williams DG. 2004. Response of net ecosystem gas exchange to a simulated precipitation pulse in a semi-arid grassland: the role of native versus non-native grasses and soil texture. Oecologia 141: 295-305.
30. IPCC. 2001. Third assessment report of Working Group I. In: United Nations environmental programme. Geneva, Switzerland: UN.
31. 2 concentration does not directly affect leaf respiration in bean or poplar. Plant, Cell & Environment 24: 1139-1151.
32. 2 concentration may directly affect leaf respiration measurement in tobacco, but not respiration itself. Plant, Cell & Environment 25: 641-651.
33. 2 from four forest FACE experiments. Global Change Biology 10: 1027-1042.
34. Koide RT, Robichaux RH, Morse SR, Smith CM. 1991. Plant water status, hydraulic resistance and capacitance. In: Pearcy RW, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Rundel PW, eds. plant physiological ecology. New York, NY, USA: Chapman & Hall, 161-183.
35. Law BE, Goldstein AH, Anthoni PM, Unsworth MH, Panek JA, Bauer MR, Frachebound JM, Hultman N. 2001. Carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange by young and old ponderosa pine ecosystems during a dry summer. Tree Physiology 21: 299-308.
36. 2 concentrations using a tropical rainforest mesocosm. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 25: 547-556.
37. Lindroth A, Cienciala E. 1996. Water use efficiency of short-rotation Salix viminalis at leaf, tree and stand scales. Tree Physiology 16: 257-262.
38. Lipson DA, Blair M, Barron-Gafford GA, Grieve K, Murthy R. 2006. Relationships between microbial community structure and soil processes under elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Microbial Ecology 51: 302-314.
39. Lu P, Yunusa IAM, Walker RR, Miller WJ. 2003. Regulation of canopy conductance and transpiration and their modeling in irrigated grapevines. Functional Plant Biology 30: 689-698.
40. Marron N, Delay D, Petit JM, Dreyer E, Kahlem G, Delmotte FM, Brignolas F. 2002. Physiological traits of two Populus x euramericana clones, Luisa Avanzo and Dorskamp, during a water stress and re-watering cycle. Tree Physiology 22: 849-858.
41. Martens DA, McLain JET. 2003. Vegetation community impacts on soil carbon, nitrogen and trace gas fluxes. In: Renard KG, McElroy SA, Gburek WJ, Canfield HE, Scott RL, eds. First Interagency Conference on Research in the Watersheds. Benson, AZ, USA: US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 542-547.
42. Martin TA, Brown KJ, Cermak J, Ceulemans R, Kucera J, Meinzer FC, Rombold JS, Sprugel DG, Hinckley TM. 1997. Crown conductance and tree and stand transpiration in a second-growth Abies amabilis forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27: 797-808.
43. McCaughey JH, Iacobelli A. 1994. Modelling stomatal conductance in a northern deciduous forest, Chalk River, Ontario. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 24: 904-910.
44. McLeod AR, Long SP. 1999. Free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) in global change research: a review. In: Advances in ecological research. London: Academic Press, 56.
45. Medlyn BR, Dreyer E, Ellsworth D, Forstreuter M, Harley PC, Kirschbaum MUF, Le Roux X, Montpied P, Strassemeyer J, Walcroft A, Wang K, Loustau D. 2002. Temperature response of parameters of a biochemically based model of photsynthesis. II. A review of experimental data. Plant, Cell & Environment 25: 1167-1179.
46. Monteith JL. 1995. A reinterpretation of stomatal responses to humidity. Plant, Cell & Environment 18: 357-364.
47. Murthy R, Griffin KL, Zarnoch SJ, Dougherty PM, Watson B, Van Haren J, Patterson RL, Mahato T. 2003. Carbon dioxide efflux from a 550-m3 soil across a range of soil temperatures. Forest Ecology and Management 178: 311-327.
48. 2 influx in well-watered treatments to individual leaf, stomatally-limited influx under water stress. Global Change Biology 11: 716-731.
49. 2: case studies, processes, and perspectives. Ecological studies. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 231-251.
50. Oren R, Phillips N, Katul G, Ewers BE, Pataki DE. 1998. Scaling xylem sap flux and soil water balance and calculating variance: a method for partitioning water flux in forests. Annales des Sciences Forestieres 55: 191-216.
51. Oren R, Phillips N, Ewers BE, Pataki DE, Megonigal JP. 1999a. Sap-flux-scaled transpiration responses to light, vapor pressure deficit, and leaf area reduction in a flooded Taxodium distichum forest. Tree Physiology 19: 337-347.
52. Oren R, Sperry JS, Katul GG, Pataki DE, Ewers BE, Phillips N, Schafer KVR. 1999b. Survery and synthesis of intra- and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit. Plant, Cell & Environment 22: 1515-1526.
53. Pieruschka R, Schurr U, Jahnke S. 2005. Lateral gas diffusion inside leaves. Journal of Experimental Botany 56: 857-864.
54. 2 from shaded to illuminated leaf parts affects photosynthesis inside homobaric leaves. New Phytologist 169: 779-787.
55. Rosenzweig C, Hillel D. 1993. The Dust Bowl of the 1930s: analog of greenhouse effect in Great Plains? Journal of Environmental Quality 22: 9-22.
56. Saliendra NZ, Sperry JS, Comstock JP. 1995. Influence of leaf water status on stomatal response to humidity, hydraulic conductance, and soil drought in Betula occidentalis. Planta 196: 357-366.
57. Sandford AP, Jarvis PG. 1986. Stomatal responses to humidity in selected conifers. Tree Physiology 2: 89-103.
58. Saxe H, Cannell GR, Johnsen O, Ryan MG, Vourlitis G. 2001. Tree and forest functioning in response to global warming. New Phytologist 149: 3699-3400.
59. Sellin A, Kupper P. 2005. Variation in leaf conductance of silver birch: effects of irradiance, vapour pressure deficit, leaf water status and position within a crown. Forest Ecology and Management 206: 153-166.
60. Smith FW, Sampson DA, Long JN. 1991. Comparison of leaf area index estimates from tree allometrics and measured light interception. Forest Science 37: 1682-1688.
61. Teskey RO, Hinkley TM, Grier CC. 1983. Effects of interuption of flowpath on stomatal conductance of Abies amabilis. Journal of Experimental Botany 34: 1251-1259.
62. Torbert HA, Johnson HB. 2001. Soil of the intensive agriculture biome of Biosphere 2. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 56: 4-11.
63. Turnbull MH, Murthy R, Griffin KL. 2002. The relative impacts of daytime and night-time warming on photosynthetic capacity in Populus deltoides. Plant, Cell & Environment 25: 1729-1737.
64. Tyree MT, Sperry JS. 1988. Do woody plants operate near the point of catastrophic xylem dysfunction caused by dynamic water stress? Plant Physiology 88: 574-580.
65. 2 enrichment of four tree species. Journal of Experimental Botany 48: 2095-2102.
66. Will RE, Teskey RO. 1999. Influence of rate of change in stomatal conductance to fluctuating irradiance on estimates of daily water use by Pinus taeda leaves. Tree Physiology 19: 761-765.
67. Yepez EA, Huxman TE, Ignace DD, English NB, Weltzin JF, Castellanos AE, Williams DG. 2005. Dynamics of transpiration and evaporation following a moisture pulse in semiarid grassland: a chamber-based isotope method for partitioning flux components. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 132: 359-376.
68. Zabel B, Hawes P, Hewitt S, Marino BDV. 1999. Construction and engineering of a created environment: overview of the Biosphere 2 closed system. Ecological Engineering 13: 43-63.