Community coalitions as a system: Effects of network change on adoption of evidence-based substance abuse prevention

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 97, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 880-886

  Valente, Thomas W ^a   Chich, Ping Chou ^a   Pentz, Mary Ann ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PLANNING; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; TRAINING; ADDICTION; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMMUNITY CARE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; INTERVENTION STUDY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

BENCHMARKING; COMMUNITY NETWORKS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEALTH CARE COALITIONS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERVENTION STUDIES; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 34247282735     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.063644     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Institute of Medicine. Assuring the Health of the Public in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2002.
2. Berkowitz B, Wolff T. The Spirit of the Coalition. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 2000.
3. Provan KG, Nakama L, Veazie MA, Teufel-Shone NI, Huddleston C. Building community capacity around chronic disease services through a collaborative interorganizational network. Health Educ Behav. 2003;30:646-662.
4. Pentz MA. Form follows function: designs for prevention effectiveness and diffusion research. Prev Sci. 2004;5:23-29.
5. Saxe L, Reber E, Hallfors D, et al. Think globally, act locally: assessing the impact of community-based substance abuse prevention. Eval Program Plann. 1997;20:357-366.
6. Pentz MA. Evidence-Based Prevention: Characteristics, impact, and future direction. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2003;35(special suppl):143-152.
7. Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP). CSAP's prevention portal: model programs, 2002. Available at: http://modelprograms.samhsa.gov/template. cfm. Accessed May 16, 2005.
8. Hawkins DJ, Catalano RF, Arthur MW. Promoting science-based prevention in communities. Addictive Behav. 2002;27:951-976.
9. Butterfoss FD, Goodman RM, Wandersman A. Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion: factors predicting satisfaction, participation and planning. Health Educ Q. 1996;23:65-79.
10. Hays CE, Hays S.Pl, DeVille JO, Mulhall PF. Capacity for effectiveness: the relationship between coalition structure and community impact. Eval Program Plann. 2000;23:373-379.
11. Jasuja GK, Chou CP, Bernstein K, Wang E, McClure M, Pentz MA. Using structural characteristics of community coalitions to predict progress in adopting evidence-based prevention programs. Eval Program Plann. 2005;28:173-184.
12. Kegler M, Steckler A, McLeroy K, Malek SH. Factors that contribute to effective community health promotion coalitions: a study of 10 Project ASSIST coalitions in North Carolina. Health Educ Res. 1998;13:225-238.
13. Mansergh G, Rohrbach L, Montgomery SB, Pentz MA, Johnson CA. Process evaluation of community coalitions for alcohol and other drug prevention: comparison of two models. J Community Psychol. 1996;24:118-135.
14. Kwait J, Valente TW, Celentano DD. Interorganizational relationships among HIV/AIDS service organizations in Baltimore: a network analysis. J Urban Health. 2001;78:468-487.
15. Stuart TE. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: an investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Admin Sci Q. 1998;43:668-698.
16. Wickizer T, Von Korff M, Cheadle A, et al. Activating communities for health promotion: a process evaluation method. Am J Public Health. 1993;83:122-129.
17. Ennett ST, Bauman KE. Peer group structure and adolescent cigarette smoking: a social network analysis. J Health Soc Behav. 1993;34:226-236.
18. Alexander C, Piazza M, Mekos D, Valente TW. Peer networks and adolescent cigarette smoking: an analysis of the national longitudinal study of adolescent health. J Adolesc Health. 2001;29:22-30.
19. Valente TW, Watkins S, Jato MN, Van der Straten A, Tsitsol LM. Social network associations with contraceptive use among Cameroonian women in voluntary associations. Soc Sci Med. 1997;45:677-687.
20. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York, NY: Free Press; 2003.
21. Moore S, Shiell A, Hawe P, Haines V. The privileging of communitarian ideas: citation practices and the translation of social capital into public health research. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:1330-1337.
22. Pearce N, Smith GD. Is social capital the key to inequalities in health? Am J Public Health. 2003;93:122-129.
23. Lomas J. Social capital and health: implications for public health and epidemiology. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:1181-1188.
24. Scott J. Network Analysis: A Handbook. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage; 2000.
25. Wasserman S, Faust K. Social Networks Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
26. Valente TW. Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press; 1995.
27. Freeman L. Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Soc Networks. 1979;1:215-239.
28. Guimera R, Arenas A, Díaz-Guilera A, Giralt F. Dynamical properties of model communication networks. Physical Review E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2002;66(2 pt 2):026704.
29. Singer HH, Kegler MC. Assessing interorganizational networks as a dimension of community capacity: illustrations from a community intervention to prevent lead poisoning. Health Educ Behav. 2004;31:808-821.
30. Gans H. The Urban Villagers: Group and Class in the Life of Italian-Americans. New York, NY: Free Press; 1962.
31. Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol. 1973;78:1360-1380.
32. Oh H, Chung MH, Labianca G. Group social capital and group effectiveness: the role of informal socializing ties. Acad Manage J. 2004;47:860-875.
33. Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Admin Sci Q. 1997;42:35-67.
34. Shaw ME. Communication networks. In: Berkowitz L, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1964:111-147.
35. Roberts KH, O'Reilly III CA. Some correlates of communication roles in organizations. Acad Manage J. 1979;22:42-57.
36. Flap H, Völker B. Goal specific social capital and job satisfaction: effects of different types of networks on instrumental and social aspects of work. Soc Networks. 2001;23:297-320.
37. Barabasi AL. Linked: How Everything Is Connected to Everything Else and What It Means for Business, Science and Everyday Life. New York, NY: Plume; 2003.
38. Malone T. The Future of Work: How the New Order of Business Will Shape Your Organization, Your Management Style and Your Life. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press; 2004.
39. Pentz MA. Community organization and school liaisons: how to get programs started. J School Health. 1986;56:382-388.
40. Bandura A, Jeffrey RW, Wright CL. Efficacy of participant modeling as a function of response induction aids. J Abnorm Psychol. 1974;83:56-64.
41. Hawkins JD, Catalano RF. Communities that Care: Action for Drug Abuse Prevention. San Francisco; Calif: Jossey-Bass; 1992.
42. Pentz MA, Dwyer JH, MacKinnon DP, et al. A multi-community trial for primary prevention of adolescent drug abuse: effects on drug use prevalence. JAMA. 1989;261:3259-3266.
43. Pentz MA, Mihalic SF, Grotpeter JK. The Midwestern prevention project. In: Elliot DS, ed. Blueprints for Violence Prevention. Boulder, Colo: University of Colorado; 1997:3-43.
44. Arthur MW, Hawkins DJ, Catalano RF, Olson JJ. Diffusion Project: Fall 1998 Community Key Informant Interview. Seattle, Wash: University of Washington; 1998.
45. Greenberg M, Osgood W. Technical report on the Community Evaluation Scales (CES). University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University; 2000.
46. Pentz MA, Valente TW. (1993). Project STAR: a substance abuse prevention campaign in Kansas City. In: Becker TE, Rogers EM, eds. Organizational Aspects of Health Communication Campaigns: What Works? Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 1993:37-60.
47. Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC. UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, Mass: Analytic Technologies; 2004.
48. Bentler PM. EQS Structural Equations Program Manual. Encino, Calif: Multivariate Software, Inc; 1995.
49. Intercooled STATA 8.0 for Windows. College Station, Tex: STATA; 2003.
50. Valente TW. Evaluating Health Promotion Programs. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2002.
51. Goodman RM, Speers MA, McLeroy K, et al. Identifying and defining the dimensions of community capacity to provide a basis for measurement. Health Educ Behav. 1998;25:258-278.
52. Kadushin C. Why it is so difficult to form effective coalitions. City Community. 2005;4:255-275.