Adaptive agent negotiation via argumentation

Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 384-391

  Kakas, Antonis ^a   Moraitis, Pavlos ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Negotiation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; TELECOMMUNICATION LINKS;

AGENT NEGOTIATION; ARGUMENTATION; NEGOTIATION STRATEGIES;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS;

EID: 34247268287     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1160633.1160701     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Amgoud L. and Parsons S. Agent dialogues with conflicting preferences, in Proc. ATAL'01, pp. 190-205, 2001.
2. Amgoud L., Parsons S., and Maudet N. Arguments, dialogue and negotiation, in Proc. ECAI'00, pp. 338-342, 2000.
3. Brewka, G. and Eiter, T. Preferred Answer Sets for Extended Logic Programs, Artificial Intelligence 109, 297-356, 1999.
4. Dimopoulos, Y., Kakas, A., and Moraitis, P. Argumentation Based Modeling of Embedded Agent Dialogues, in ArgMAS'05, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2005.
5. Dumas M., Governatori G., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., and Oaks, P. "A formal approach to negotiating agents development", in Electronic Commerce and Applications, Vol. 1, No 2, Elsevier Science Publications, 2002.
6. Faratin, P., Sierra, C., and Jennings, N.R. "Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiation", in Artificial Intelligence 142 (2) 205-237, 2001.
7. Hamblin, C.L. Fallacies, Methuen, London, 1970.
8. Jennings, N. R., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A.R., Parsons, S., Sierra C., and Wooldridge, M. Automated Negotiation: Prospects, methods and challenges, in J. of Group Decision and Negotiation 10 (2) 199-215, 2001.
9. Kakas A. and Moraitis, P. Argumentative Agent Deliberation, Roles and Context, in Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, (ENTCS), 70(5), 2002.
10. Kakas, A. and Moraitis, P. Argumentation based decision making for autonomous agents", in Proc. AAMAS'03, pp. 883-890, 2003.
11. Kakas, A., Mancarella P., and Dung, P.M. The acceptability semantics for logic programs, in Proc. ICLP'94, pp. 504-519, 1994.
12. Kakas, A., Maudet, N., and Moraitis, P. Modular Representation of Agent Interaction Rules through Argumentation, in J. of AAMAS, Springer, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 189-206, 2005.
13. MacKenzie, J. Question-begging in non-cumulative systems, in Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8:117-133, 1979.
14. Parsons, S., Sierra, C., and Jennings, N.R. Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing, in Journal of Logic and Computation, 8(3), pp. 261-292, 1998.
15. Prakken, H. and Sartor, G. A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning, in Journal of Artificial Intelligence, and Law, Vol. 4, pp. 331-368, 1996.
16. Rahwan, I., Ramchurn, S. D., Jennings, N. R., McBurney, P., Parsons S., and Sonenberg, L. Argumentation-based negotiation, in Knowledge Engineering Review, 18 (4) 343-375, 2003.
17. Rosenschein, J.S. and Zlotkin, G. Roles of Encounter, MIT Press, 1994.
18. Sandholm, T.W. Distributed Rational Decision Making, In Multiagent Systems: A modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence, G. Weiss (eds.), pp. 201-258, 1999.
19. Sycara, K. Argumentation: planning other agents' plans, in Proc. IJCAI'89, pp. 517-523, 1989.
20. Gorgias: Argumentation with Abduction, http://www.cs.ucy.ac.cy/~nkd/ gorgias