Argumentative agent deliberation, roles and context

Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science

Volumn 70, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 39-53

  Kakas, Antonis C ^a   Moraïtis, Pavlos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SCIENCE; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

ARGUMENTATIVE AGENT DELIBERATION; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; DECISION POLICY; DECISION RULES;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS;

EID: 16244402506     PISSN: 15710661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1571-0661(04)80587-5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Amgoud L., Maudet N., Parsons S. Modelling dialogues using argumentation. ICMZS-00. 2000;31-38
2. L. Amgoud, and S. Parsons. Agent dialogues with conflicting preferences. In ATAL01, 2001
3. Amgoud L., Parsons S., Maudet N. Arguments, dialogue and negotiation. ECAI-00. 2000;338-342
4. Bondarenko A., Dung P.M., Kowalski R.A., Toni F. An abstract, argumentation-theoretic framework for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence. 93:(1-2):1997;63-101
5. Brewka G. Dynamic argument systems: a formal model of argumentation process based on situation calculus. Journal of Logic and Computation. 11:(2):2001;257-282
6. Y. Dimopoulos and A. C. Kakas. Logic programming without negation as failure. In Proc. ILPS '95, pp. 369-384, 1995
7. Dung P.M. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence. 77:1995;321-357. (also in IJCAI '93)
8. P. M. Dung, A. C. Kakas and P. Mancarella. Negation as failure revisited. In University of Pisa Technical Report, 1992
9. A. C. Kakas, P. Mancarella, and P. M. Dung. The acceptability semantics for logic programs. In Proc. ICLP '94, pp. 504-519, 1994
10. Kakas A.C. Default reasoning via negation as failure. LNAI. Vol. 810:1994;160-179
11. Kakas A.C., Kowalski R.A., Toni F. Abductive logic programming. Journal of Logic and Computation. 2:(6):1992;719-770
12. Kakas A.C., Miller R.S., Toni F. E-res: Reasoning about actions, events and observations. LPNMR '01. 2001;254-266
13. Kakas A.C., Toni F. Computing argumentation in logic programming. JLC. 9:(4):1999;515-562. O. U. P
14. Karacapildis N., and P. Moraitis. Engineering issues in inter-agent dialogues. Proc. of 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligent (ECAI 02), Lyon, France, 2002
15. Kraus S., Sycara K., Evenchik A. Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation. Artificial Intelliegence. 104:1998;1-69
16. Panzarasa P., Jennings N.R., Norman T. Formalising collaborative decision-making and practical reasoning in multi-agent systems. Journal of Logic and Computation, to appear. 12:(1):2002
17. Parsons S., Sierra C., Jennings N.R. Agents that reason and negotiate by arguying. Logic and Computation. 8:(3):1998;261-292
18. Pollock J.L. Justification and defeat. Artficial Intelligence. Vol 67:1994;377-407
19. Prakken H., Sartor G. A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning. Artficial Intelligence and Law. 4:1996;331-368
20. F. Sadri, F. Toni, P. Torroni. Dialogues for negotiation: agent varieties and dialogue sequences. ATAL 01, 2001
21. Sierra C., Jennings N.R., Noriega P., Parsons S. A framework for argumentation-based negotiation. ATAL-97. 1997;167-182
22. Sycara K. Argumentation: Planning other agents' plans. IJCAI-89. 1989;517-523
23. Wooldridge M., Jennings N.R., Kinny D. The gaia methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design. JAAMAS. 3:(3):2000;285-312