Arithmetic rules and numeral format

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 335-355

  Campbell, Jamie I D ^a   Metcalfe, Arron W S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARITHMETIC; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MEMORY; MENTAL FUNCTION; MENTAL TASK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 34247254948     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: 14640635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440600717610     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ashcraft, M. H. (1995). Cognitive psychology and simple arithmetic: A review and summary of new directions. Mathematical Cognition, 1, 3-34.
2. Brysbaert, M. (1995). Arabic number reading: On the nature of the numerical scale and the origin of phonological recoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 343-447.
3. Butterworth, B., Zorzi, M., Girelli, L., & Jonkheere, A. R. (2001). Storage and retrieval of addition facts: The role of number comparison. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1005-1029.
4. Campbell, J. I. D. (1994). Architectures for numerical cognition. Cognition, 53, 1-44.
5. Campbell, J. I. D. (1997). Reading-based interference in cognitive arithmetic. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 74-81.
6. Campbell, J. I. D. (1998). Notational and linguistic influences in cognitive arithmetic: Comment on Noël, Fias, & Brysbaert (1997). Cognition, 67, 353-564.
7. Campbell, J. I. D., & Clark, J. M. (1992). Cognitive number processing: An encoding-complex perspective. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), The nature and origins of mathematical skills (pp. 457-492). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
8. Campbell, J. I. D., & Epp, L. J. (2005a). An encoding complex approach to numerical cognition in Chinese-English bilinguals. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 229-244.
9. Campbell, J. I. D., & Epp, L. J. (2005b). Architectures for arithmetic. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 347-360). New York: Psychology Press.
10. Campbell, J. I. D., & Fugelsang, J. (2001). Strategy choice for arithmetic verification: Effects of numerical surface form. Cognition, 80, B21-B30.
11. Campbell, J. I. D., Parker, H. R., & Doetzel, N. L. (2004). Interactive effects of numerical surface form and operand parity in cognitive arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 51-64.
12. Campbell, J. I. D., & Xue, Q. (2001). Cognitive arithmetic across cultures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 299-315.
13. Clark, J. M., & Campbell, J. I. D. (1991). Integrated versus modular theories of number skills and acalculia. Brain and Cognition, 17, 204-239.
14. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396.
15. Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1995). Toward an anatomical and functional model of number processing. Mathematical Cognition, 1, 83-120.
16. Hearst, E. (1991). The psychology of nothing. American Scientist, 79, 432-443.
17. Jost, K., Beinhoff, U., Hennighausen, E., & Rösler, F. (2004). Facts, rules and strategies in simple multiplication: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 183-193.
18. LeFevre, J., Bisanz, J., Daley, K. E., Buffone, L., Greenham, S. L., & Sadesky, G. S. (1996). Multiple routes to solution of single-digit multiplication problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 284-306.
19. LeFevre, J., Sadesky, G. S., & Bisanz, J. (1996). Selection of procedures in mental addition: Reassessing the problem size effect in adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 216-230.
20. Lemaire, P., & Reder, L. (1999). What affects strategy selection in arithmetic? The example of parity and five effects on product verification. Memory and Cognition, 22, 364-382.
21. Masson, M. E. J., & Loftus, G. R. (2003). Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 203-220.
22. McCloskey, M. (1992). Cognitive mechanisms in numerical processing: Evidence from acquired dyscalculia. Cognition, 44, 107-157.
23. Miller, K., Perlmutter, M., & Keating, D. (1984). Cognitive arithmetic: Comparison of operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 46-60.
24. Noël, M. P., Fias, W., & Brysbaert, M. (1997). About the influence of the presentation format on arithmetical-fact retrieval processes. Cognition, 63, 335-374.
25. Pesenti, M., Depoorter, N., & Seron, X. (2000). Noncommutability of the N+0 arithmetical rule: A case study of a dissociated impairment. Cortex, 36, 445-454.
26. Sokol, S. M., McCloskey, M., Cohen, N. J., & Aliminosa, D. (1991). Cognitive representations and processes in arithmetic: Inferences from the performance of brain-damaged patients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 355-376.
27. Szucs, D., & Csépe, V. (2004). Access to numerical information is dependent on the modality of stimulus presentation in mental addition: A combined ERP and behavioral study. Cognitive Brain Research, 19, 10-27.
28. Zbrodoff, N. J., & Logan, G. D. (2005). What everyone finds: The problem size effect. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 331-346). New York: Psychology Press.