Interactive Effects of Numerical Surface Form and Operand Parity in Cognitive Arithmetic

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 51-64

  Campbell, Jamie I D ^a   Parker, Helen R ^a   Doetzel, Nicole L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIGHT; MALE; MATHEMATICS; PROBLEM SOLVING; REACTION TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIGHT; MALE; MATHEMATICS; PROBLEM SOLVING; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0942268059     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.51     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Ashcraft, M. H. (1992). Cognitive arithmetic: A review of data and theory. Cognition, 44, 75-106.
2. Ashcraft, M. H. (1995). Cognitive psychology and simple arithmetic: A review and summary of new directions. Mathematical Cognition, 1, 3-34.
3. Ashcraft, M. A., & Christy, K. S. (1995). The frequency of arithmetic facts in elementary texts: Addition and multiplication in Grades 1-6. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 5, 396-421.
4. Bernardo, A. B. I. (2001). Asymmetric activation of number codes in bilinguals: Further evidence for the encoding-complex model of number processing. Memory & Cognition, 29, 968-976.
5. Blankenberger, S., & Vorberg, D. (1997). The single-format assumption in arithmetic fact retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 721-738.
6. Campbell, J. I. D. (1992). In defense of the encoding-complex approach: Reply to McCloskey, Macaruso, and Whetstone. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), The nature and origins of mathematical skills (pp. 539-556). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
7. Campbell, J. I. D. (1994). Architectures for numerical cognition. Cognition, 53, 1-44.
8. Campbell, J. I. D. (1995). Mechanisms of simple addition and multiplication: A modified network-interference theory and simulation. Mathematical Cognition, 1, 121-164.
9. Campbell, J. I. D. (1997). Reading-based interference in cognitive arithmetic. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 74-81.
10. Campbell, J. I. D. (1998). Notational and linguistic influences in cognitive arithmetic: Comment on Noël, Fias, & Brysbaert (1997). Cognition, 67, 353-364.
11. Campbell, J. I. D. (1999). The Surface Form × Problem-Size interaction in cognitive arithmetic: Evidence against an encoding locus. Cognition, 70, 25-33.
12. Campbell, J. I. D., & Austen, A. (2002). Effects of response time deadlines on adults' strategy choices for simple addition. Memory & Cognition, 30, 988-994.
13. Campbell, J. I. D., & Clark, J. M. (1988). An encoding complex view of cognitive number processing: Comment on McCloskey, Sokol, and Goodman (1986). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 204-214.
14. Campbell, J. I. D., & Clark, J. M. (1992). Cognitive number processing: An encoding-complex perspective. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), The nature and origins of mathematical skills (pp. 457-492). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
15. Campbell, J. I. D., & Fugelsang, J. (2001). Strategy choice for arithmetic verification: Effects of numerical surface form. Cognition, 80, B21-B30.
16. Campbell, J. I. D., & Gunter, R. (2002). Calculation, culture, and the repeated operand effect. Cognition, 86, 71-96.
17. Campbell, J. I. D., Kanz, C. L., & Xue, Q. (1999). Number processing in Chinese-English bilinguals. Mathematical Cognition, 5, 1-39.
18. Campbell, J. I. D., & Timm, J. C. (2000). Adults' strategy choices for simple addition: Effects of retrieval interference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 692-699.
19. Campbell, J. I. D., & Xue, Q. (2001). Cognitive arithmetic across cultures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 299-315.
20. Chochon, F., Cohen, L., van de Moortele, P. F., & Dehaene, S. (1999). Differential contributions of the left and right parietal lobules to number processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 617-630.
21. Clark, J. M., & Campbell, J. I. D. (1991). Integrated versus modular theories of number skills and acalculia. Brain and Cognition, 17, 204-239.
22. Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (1994). Amnesia for arithmetic facts: A single case study. Brain and Language, 47, 214-232.
23. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396.
24. Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1995). Toward an anatomical and functional model of number processing. Mathematical Cognition, 1, 83-120.
25. Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1997). Cerebral pathways for calculation: Double dissociation between rote verbal and quantitative knowledge of arithmetic. Cortex, 33, 219-250.
26. Frenck-Mestre, C. A., & Vaid, J. (1993). Activation of number fact in bilinguals. Memory & Cognition, 21, 809-818.
27. Geary, D. C. (1996). The problem-size effect in mental addition: Developmental and cross-national trends. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 63-93.
28. Gonzalez, E. G., & Kolers, P. A. (1987). Notational constraints on mental operations. In G. Deloche & X. Seron (Eds.), Mathematical disabilities: A cognitive neuropsychological perspective (pp. 27-42). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Hamann, M. S., & Ashcraft, M. H. (1986). Textbook presentations of the basic addition facts. Cognition and Instruction, 3, 173-192.
30. Hecht, S. A. (1999). Individual solution processes while solving addition and multiplication math facts in adults. Memory & Cognition, 27, 1097-1107.
31. Hines, T. M. (1990). An odd effect: Lengthened reaction times for judgments about odd digits. Memory & Cognition, 18, 40-46.
32. Hines, T. M., Herman-Jeglinska, A., Bednarek, D., & Grabowska, A. (1996). Sex differences in the processing of odd and even numbers. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 56, 263-266.
33. Hittmair-Delazer, M., Semenza, C., & Denes, G. (1994). Concepts and facts in calculation. Brain, 117, 715-728.
34. Kashiwagi, A., Kashiwagi, T., & Hasegawa, T. (1987). Improvement of deficits in mnemonic rhyme for multiplication in Japanese aphasics. Neuropsychologia, 25, 443-447.
35. Kirk, E. P., & Ashcraft, M. H. (2001). Telling stories: The perils and promise of using verbal reports to study math strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 157-175.
36. Krueger, L. E. (1986). Why 2 × 2 = 5 looks so wrong: On the odd-even rule in product verification. Memory & Cognition, 14, 141-149.
37. Krueger, L. E., & Hallford, E. W. (1984). Why 2 + 2 = 5 looks so wrong: On the odd-even rule in sum verification. Memory & Cognition, 12, 171-180.
38. LeFevre, J., Bisanz, J., Daley, K. E., Buffone, L., Greenham, S. L., & Sadesky, G. S. (1996). Multiple routes to solution of single-digit multiplication problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 284-306.
39. LeFevre, J., Lei, Q., Smith-Chant, B. L., & Mullins, D. B. (2001). Multiplication by eye and by ear for Chinese-speaking and English-speaking adults. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 285-295.
40. LeFevre, J., & Liu, J. (1997). The role of experience in numerical skill: Multiplication performance in adults from China and Canada. Mathematical Cognition, 3, 31-62.
41. LeFevre, J., & Morris, J. (1999). More on the relation between division and multiplication in simple arithmetic: Evidence for mediation of division solutions via multiplication. Memory & Cognition, 27, 803-812.
42. LeFevre, J., Sadesky, G. S., & Bisanz, J. (1996). Selection of procedures in mental addition: Reassessing the problem size effect in adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 216-230.
43. Lemaire, P., & Fayol, M. (1995). When plausibility judgments supersede fact retrieval: The example of the odd-even effect on product verification. Memory & Cognition, 23, 34-48.
44. Lemaire, P., & Reder, L. (1999). What affects strategy selection in arithmetic? The example of parity and five effects on product verification. Memory & Cognition, 22, 364-382.
45. Lemaire, P., & Siegler, R. S. (1995). Four aspects of strategic change: Contributions to children's learning of multiplication. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 83-97.
46. Lochy, A., Seron, X., Delazer, M., & Butterworth, B. (2000). The odd-even parity effect in multiplication: Parity rule or familiarity with even numbers? Memory & Cognition, 28, 358-365.
47. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
48. Masse, C., & Lemaire, P. (2001). On strategic combination: A case study of parity and five-rule effects in arithmetical problem solving. Psychological Research, 65, 28-33.
49. McCloskey, M. (1992). Cognitive mechanisms in numerical processing: Evidence from acquired dyscalculia. Cognition, 44, 107-157.
50. McCloskey, M., Macaruso, P., & Whetstone, T. (1992). The functional architecture of numerical processing mechanisms: Defending the modular model. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), The nature and origins of mathematical skills (pp. 493-537). Elsevier: Amsterdam.
51. McNeil, J., & Warrington, E. K. (1994). A dissociation between addition and subtraction with written calculation. Neuropsychologia, 32, 717-728.
52. Noel, M.-P., Fias, W., & Brysbaert, M. (1997). About the influence of the presentation format on arithmetical-fact retrieval processes. Cognition, 63, 335-374.
53. Noël, M.-P., & Seron, X. (1992). Notational constraints and number processing: A reappraisal of the Gonzalez and Kolers (1982) study. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 451-478.
54. Rickard, T. C., Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (1994). On the representation of arithmetic facts: Operand order, symbol, and operation transfer effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1139-1153.
55. Robinson, K. M. (2001). The validity of verbal reports in children's subtraction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 211-222.
56. Schunn, C. D., Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Richards, D. R., & Stroffolino, P. J. (1997). To calculate or not to calculate: A source activation confusion model of problem familiarity's role in strategy selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 3-29.
57. Siegler, R. S., & Shipley, C. (1995). Variation, selection, and cognitive change. In G. Halford & T. Simon (Eds.), Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modelling (pp. 31-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
58. Sokol, S. M., McCloskey, M., Cohen, N. J., & Aliminosa, D. (1991). Cognitive representations and processes in arithmetic: Inferences from the performance of brain-damaged patients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 355-376.
59. Vaid, J., & Frenck-Mestre, C. A. (1991). Incidental memory for format of presentation of number stimuli: Evidence from monolinguals and bilinguals. Brain and Cognition, 17, 272-284.
60. Zbrodoff, N. J. (1995). Why is 9 + 7 harder than 2 + 3? Strength and interference as explanations of the problem-size effect. Memory & Cognition, 23, 689-700.