Student teachers' discourse on assessment: Form and substance

Teaching in Higher Education

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 323-335

  Hawe, Eleanor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247252468     PISSN: 13562517     EISSN: 14701294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13562510701278666     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Allen, G. (1998) Risk and uncertainty in assessment: Exploring the contribution of economics to identifying and analyzing the social dynamic in grading. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23, pp. 241-258.
2. Angelo, T. A. and Cross, K. P. (1993) Classroom assessment techniques. A handbook for college teachers, Jossey-Bass Inc, San Francisco, CA
3. Becker, H. S. (1998) Tricks of the trade, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
4. Becker, H. S., Geer, B. and Hughes, E. C. (1968) Making the grade: The academic side of college, John Wiley & Sons, New York
5. Biggs, J. (1999) What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 181, pp. 57-75.
6. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B. and Wiliam, D. (2003) Assessment for learning. Putting it into practice, Open University Press, Maidenhead
7. Boud, D. (1995) Assessment and learning: Contradictory or complementary?. Assessment for learning in higher education, Kogan Page, London
8. Brown, J. S., Collins, A. and Duguid, P. (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18:1, pp. 32-42.
9. Burgess, R. G. (1984) In the field: An introduction to field research, Routledge, London
10. Case, J. and Gunstone, R. (2003) Going deeper than deep and surface approaches: A study of students' perceptions of time. Teaching in Higher Education, 8:1, pp. 55-69.
11. Cowie, B. and Bell, B. (1999) A model of formative assessment in science education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 6:1, pp. 101-116.
12. Crocker, L. (1997) Assessing content representativeness of performance assessment exercises. Applied Measurement in Education, 10, pp. 83-95.
13. Denzin, N. (1994) The art and politics of interpretation. Handbook of qualitative research, Sage, Thousand, CA
14. Elwood, J. and Klenowski, V. (2002) Creating communities of shared practice: The challenges of assessment use in learning and teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27:3, pp. 243-256.
15. Falchikov, N. (1995) Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32:2, pp. 175-187.
16. Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research, Aldine de Gruyter, New York
17. Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. (1983) Ethnography. Principles in practice, Routledge, London
18. Harlen, W. (2005) Teachers' summative practices and assessment for learning-tensions and synergies. The Curriculum Journal, 16:2, pp. 207-223.
19. Maclellan, E. (2001) Assessment for learning: The differing perceptions of tutors and students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26:4, pp. 307-318.
20. Murphy, R. and Torrance, H. (1988) The changing face of educational assessment, Open University Press, Milton Keynes
21. O'Donovan, B., Price, M. and Rust, C. (2004) Know what I mean? Enhancing student understanding of assessment standards and criteria. Teaching in Higher Education, 9:3, pp. 325-335.
22. Orsmond, P., Merry, S. and Reiling, K. (2002) The use of exemplars and formative feedback when using student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27:4, pp. 309-323.
23. Ramsden, P. (1992) Learning to teach in higher education, Routledge, London
24. Reimer, J. W. (1977) Varieties of opportunistic research. Urban Life, 5:4, pp. 467-477.
25. Rogoff, B. (1990) Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social contexts, Oxford University Press, Oxford
26. Rust, C., Price, M. and O'Donovan, B. (2003) Improving students' learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28:2, pp. 147-164.
27. Sadler, R. D. (1989) Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18:1, pp. 119-144.
28. Sadler, R. D. (1998) Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory, Assessment in Education: Principles. Policy and Practice, 5:1, pp. 77-84.
29. Sambell, K. and McDowell, L. (1998) The construction of the hidden curriculum: Messages and meanings in the assessment of student learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23:4, pp. 391-402.
30. Sambell, K., McDowell, L. and Brown, S. (1997) But is it fair?: An exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23:4, pp. 349-371.
31. Scriven, M. (1967) The methodology of evaluation, in: AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation no. 1. Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation, Rand McNally, Chicago, IL
32. Snyder, B. R. (1971) The hidden curriculum, Knopf, New York
33. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1994) Grounded theory methodology. An overview. Handbook of qualitative research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
34. Thomson, K. and Falchikov, N. (1998) Full on until the sun comes out: the effects of assessment on student approaches to studying. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23:4, pp. 379-390.
35. Torrance, H. and Pryor, J. (1998) Investigating formative assessment: teaching, learning and assessment in the classroom, Open University Press, Buckingham
36. Yorke, M. (2003) Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45, pp. 477-501.