Learning the correlational structure of stimuli in a one-attribute classification task

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 457-469

  Giguère, Gyslain ^a   Lacroix, Guy L ^b   Larochelle, Serge ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COGNITION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEMORY; MENTAL TASK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; STIMULUS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 34247221592     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: 14640635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440600926716     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ahn, W. K., & Medin, D. L. (1992). A two-stage model of category construction. Cognitive Science, 16, 81-121.
2. Anderson, A. L., Ross, B. H., & Chin-Parker, S. (2002). A further investigation of category learning by inference. Memory and Cognition, 30, 119-128.
3. Chin-Parker, S., & Ross, B. H. (2002). The effect of category learning on sensitivity to withincategory correlations. Memory and Cognition, 30, 353-362.
4. Chin-Parker, S., & Ross, B. H. (2004). Diagnosticity and prototypicality in category learning: A comparison of inference learning and classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 216-226.
5. Erickson, M. A., & Kruschke, J. K. (1998). Rules and exemplars in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 107-140.
6. Lachter, J., Forster, K. I., & Ruthruff, E. (2004). Forty-five years after Broadbent: Still no identification without attention. Psychological Review, 111, 880-913.
7. Lacroix, G. L., Giguère, G., & Larochelle, S. (2005). The origin of exemplar effects in rule-driven categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 272-288.
8. Lacroix, G. L., & Larochelle, S. (2000). Learning family resemblance attributes in a one-dimension rule classification task. Unpublished manuscript.
9. Lassaline, M. E., & Murphy, G. L. (1996). Induction and category coherence. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 95-99.
10. Love, B. C., Medin, D. L., & Gureckis, T. M. (2004). SUSTAIN: A network model of category learning. Psychological Review, 111, 309-332.
11. Markman, A. B., & Maddox, W. T. (2002). Classification of exemplars with single and multiple feature manifestations: The case of relevant dimension variation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 107-117.
12. Markman, A. B., & Ross, B. H. (2003). Category use and category learning. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 592-613.
13. Medin, D. L., Wattenmaker, W. D., & Hampson, S. E. (1987). Family resemblance, concept cohesiveness, and category construction. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 242-279.
14. Murphy, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Nosofsky, R. M., Palmeri, T. J., & McKinley, S. C. (1994). Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. Psychological Review, 101, 53-79.
16. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Regehr, G., & Brooks, L. R. (1993). Perceptual manifestations of an analytic structure: The priority of holistic individuation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 92-114.
18. Regehr, G., & Brooks, L. R. (1995). Category organization in free classification: The organizating effect of an array of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 347-363.
19. Schneider, W. (1989). Micro experimental laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 20, 206-217.
20. Yamauchi, T., & Markman, A. B. (2000). Learning categories composed of varying instances: The effect of classification, inference and structural alignment. Memory and Cognition, 24, 64-78.