Linking deforestation scenarios to pollination services and economic returns in coffee agroforestry systems

Ecological Applications

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 407-417

  Priess, J A ^a   Mimler, M ^a   Klein, A M ^b   Schwarze, S ^b   Tscharntke, T ^b   Steffan Dewenter, I ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KASSEL   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bee diversity; Coffea arabica L.; Crop yield; Ecosystem service; Forest margin areas; Land use and land cover change (LUCC) model; Net revenues; Policy scenario; Rain forest; Spatial modeling

Indexed keywords

AGROFORESTRY; BIODIVERSITY; COFFEE; DEFORESTATION; LAND USE CHANGE; MODELING; POLLINATION; RAINFOREST;

AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COFFEE; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FORESTRY; INDONESIA; LEGAL ASPECT; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; POLICY; POLLEN; TIME;

AGRICULTURE; COFFEA; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; FORESTRY; INDONESIA; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POLLEN; PUBLIC POLICY; TIME FACTORS;

ASIA; EURASIA; GREATER SUNDA ISLANDS; MALAY ARCHIPELAGO; SOUTHEAST ASIA; SULAWESI; SUNDA ISLES;

APOIDEA; COFFEA ARABICA;

EID: 34247211182     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/05-1795     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Achard, F., H. D. Eva, H.-J. Stibig, P. Mayaux, J. Gallego, T. Richards, and J.-P. Malingreau. 2002. Determination of deforestation rates of the world's humid tropical forests. Science 297:999-1002.
2. Alcamo, J., G. J. J. Kreileman, and R. Leemans, editors. 1998. Global change scenarios of the 21st century. Pergamon/Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK.
3. Alves, D. S. 2002. Space-time dynamics of deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia. International Journal of Remote Sensing 23:2903-2908.
4. Angelsen, A., and D. Kaimowitz. 1999. Rethinking the causes of deforestation: lessons from economic models. World Bank Research Observer 14:73-98.
5. Balmford, A., et al. 2002. Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297:950-953.
6. Balvanera, P., C. Kremen, and M. Martínez-Ramos. 2005. Applying community structure analysis to ecosystem function: examples from pollination and carbon storage. Ecological Applications 15:360-375.
7. Chapin, F. S., E. S. Zavaleta, V. T. Eviner, R. L. Naylor, P. M. Vitosek, H. L. Reynolds, D. U. Hooper, S. Lavorel, O. E. Sala, S. E. Hobbie, M. C. Mack, and S. Dí az. 2000. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405:234-242.
8. Constanza, R., et al. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253-260.
9. Daily, G. C., S. Alexander, P. Ehrlich, L. Goulder, J. Lubchenco, P. Matson, H. A. Mooney, S. Postel, S. H. Schneider, D. Tilman, and G. M. Woodwell. 1997. Ecosystem services: benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems. Issues in Ecology 2:1-16.
10. De Marco, P., and F. M. Coelho. 2004. Services performed by the ecosystem: forest remnants influence agricultural cultures' pollination and production. Biodiversity and Conservation 13:1245-1255.
11. Erasmi, S., A. Twele, M. Ardiansyah, A. Malik, and M. Kappas. 2004. Mapping defoerestation and land cover conversion at the rainforest margin in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. EARSeL eProceedings 3:388-397.
12. Erik, W. 2002. Walhi award torn up in protest at Lore Lindu illegal logging. The Jakarta Post 26 October 2002, Jakarta, Indonesia.
13. Fahrig, L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 34:487-515.
14. Fearnside, P. M. 1999. Biodiversity as an environmental service in Brazil's Amazonian forests: risks, value and conservation. Environmental Conservation 26:305-321.
15. Free, J. B. 1993. Insect pollination of crops. Academic Press, London, UK.
16. Gathmann, A., and T. Tscharntke. 2002. Foraging ranges of solitary bees. Journal of Animal Ecology 71:757-764.
17. Geist, H. J., and E. F. Lambin. 2002. Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. BioScience 52:143-150.
18. Guo, Z. W., X. M. Xiao, and D. M. Li. 2000. An assessment of ecosystem services: water flow regulation and hydroelectric power production. Ecological Applications 10:925-936.
19. International Coffee Organization 2004. Historical Data, Producer prices for arabica coffee in Indonesia 1993-2003. 〈http://www.ico.org/asp/select7. asp〉
20. Irwin, E. G., and J. Geoghegan. 2001. Theory, data, methods: developing spatially explicit economic models of land use change. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 85(1-3):7-23.
21. Kearns, C. A., D. W. Inouye, and N. M. Waser. 1998. Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant-pollinator interactions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29:83-112.
22. Klein, A.-M., I. Steffan-Dewenter, and T. Tscharntke. 2003a. Fruit set of highland coffee increases with the diversity of pollinating bees. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 270:955-961.
23. Klein, A.-M., I. Steffan-Dewenter, and T. Tscharntke. 2003b. Pollination of Coffea canephora in relation to local and regional agroforestry management. Journal of Applied Ecology 40:837-845.
24. Klein, A.-M., I. Steffan-Dewenter, and T. Tscharntke. 2003c. Bee pollination and fruit set of Coffea arabica and C. canephora (Rubiaceae). American Journal of Botany 90:153-157.
25. Kreisel, W., R. Weber, and H. Faust. 2004. Historical impacts on use and management of natural resources in the rainforest margins of central Sulawesi. Pages 39-65 in G. Gerold, M. Fremerey, and E. Guhardja, editors. Land use, nature conservation and the stability of rainforest margins in southeast Asia. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
26. Kremen, C. 2005. Managing ecosystem services: What do we need to know about their ecology? Ecology Letters 8:468-479.
27. Kremen, C., J. O. Niles, M. G. Dalton, G. C. Daily, P. R. Ehrlich, J. P. Fay, D. Grewal, and R. P. Guillery. 2000. Economic incentives for rain forest conservation across scales. Science 288:1828-1832.
28. Kremen, C., N. M. Williams, R. L. Bugg, J. P. Fay, and R. W. Thorp. 2004. The area requirements of an ecosystem service: crop pollination by native bee communities in California. Ecology Letters 7:1109-1119.
29. Kremen, C., N. M. Williams, and R. W. Thorp. 2002. Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (USA) 99:16812-16816.
30. Lambin, E. F., et al. 2001. The causes of land-use and landcover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change 11:261-269.
31. Maertens, M. 2003. Economic modeling of agricultural land-use patterns in forest frontier areas. Theory, empirical assessment and policy implications for central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Dissertation. University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
32. Maertens, M., M. Zeller, and R. Birner. 2003. Does technical progress in agriculture have a forest saving or a forest clearing effect? Theory and evidence from central Sulawesi. Pages 179-197 in G. Gerold, M. Fremerey, and E. Guhardja, editors. Land use, nature conservation and the stability of rainforest margins in southeast Asia. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
33. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
34. Murniati, D., P. Garrity, and A. N. Gintings. 2001. The contribution of agroforestry systems to reducing farmers' dependence on the resources of adjacent national parks: a case study from Sumatra, Indonesia. Agroforestry Systems 52:171-184.
35. Nair, P. K. R. 1993. An introduction to agroforestry. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
36. O'Brien, T. G., and M. F. Kinnaird. 2003. Caffeine and conservation. Science 300:587.
37. Pattanayak, S. K., and R. A. Kramer. 2001. Worth of watersheds: a producer surplus approach for valuing drought mitigation in Eastern Indonesia. Environment and Development Economics 6:123-146.
38. Priess, J. A., G. H. J. de Koning, and A. Veldkamp. 2001. Assessment of interactions between land use change and carbon and nutrient fluxes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 85:269-279.
39. Raskin, P., T. Banuri, G. Gallopí n, P. Gutman, A. Hammond, R. Kates, and R. Swart. 2002. Great transition: the promise and lure of the times ahead. A report of the Global Scenario Group. SEI PoleStar Series Report No. 10. Stockholm Environment Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
40. Ricketts, T. H. 2004. Tropical forest fragments enhance pollinator activity in nearby coffee crops. Conservation Biology 18:1262-1271.
41. Ricketts, T. H., G. C. Daily, P. R. Ehrlich, and C. D. Michen. 2004. Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 101:12579-12582.
42. Roubik, D. 2002a. The value of bees to the coffee harvest. Nature 417:708.
43. Roubik, D. 2002b. Africanized honeybees and coffee yields. Pages 255-265 in Pollinating bees. The conservation link between agriculture and Nature. Proceedings of the Workshop on the Conservation and Sustainable use of pollinators in Agriculture, with Emphasis on Bees. S. Paulo, Brazil.
44. Schwarze, S., and M. Zeller. 2005. Income diversification of rural households in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 44:61-73.
45. Shriar, A. J. 2001. The dynamics of agricultural intensification and resource conservation in the buffer zone of the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Petén, Guatemala. Human Ecology 29:27-48.
46. Soto-Pinto, L., I. Perfecto, J. Castillo-Hernandez, and J. Cabellero-Neto. 2000. Shade effect on coffee production at the northern Tzeltal zone of the state of Chiapas, Mexico. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 80:61-69.
47. Steffan-Dewenter, I., S. G. Potts, and L. Packer. 2005. Pollinator diversity and crop pollination services are at risk. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20:651-652.
48. Steininger, M. K., C. J. Tucker, J. R. G. Townshend, T. J. Killeen, A. Desch, V. Bell, and P. Ersts. 2001. Tropical deforestation in the Bolivian Amazon. Environmental Conservation 28:127-134.
49. United Nations. 2004. World population prospects: the 2004 revision. Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat. 〈http://esa.un.org/unpp〉
50. van Jaarsveld, A. S., R. Biggs, R. J. Scholes, E. Bohensky, B. Reyers, T. Lynam, C. Musvoto, and C. Fabricius. 2005. Measuring conditions and trends in ecosystem services at multiple scales: the Southern African Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (SAfMA) experience. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 360:425-441.
51. Van Rheenen, T., C. Elbel, S. Schwarze, N. Nuryartono, M. Zeller, and B. Sanim. 2003. Encroachments on primary forests: are they really driven by despair? Pages 198-213 in G. Gerold, M. Fremerey, and E. Guhardja, editors. Land use, nature conservation and the stability of rainforest margins in southeast Asia. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
52. Verburg, P. H., P. Schot, M. Dijst, and A. Veldkamp. 2004. Land use change modelling: current practice and research priorities. GeoJournal 61:309-324.
53. Verburg, P. H., W. Soepboer, A. Veldkamp, L. Limpiada, V. Espaldon, and S. S. A. Mastura. 2002. Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land use: the CLUE-S model. Environmental Management 30:391-405.
54. Zeller, M., S. Schwarze, and T. van Rheenen. 2002. Statistical sampling frame and methods used for the selection of villages and households in the scope of the research program on Stability of Rainforest Margins in Indonesia (STORMA). STORMA Discussion Paper Series No 1. Bogor, Indonesia: Universities of Göttingen and Kassel, Germany and the Institute Pertanian Bogor and Universitas Tadulako, Indonesia.