The role of cue familiarity in adults' strategy choices for simple addition

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 356-373

  Metcalfe, Arron W S ^a   Campbell, Jamie I D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; MENTAL CAPACITY; MENTAL FUNCTION; MENTAL TASK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SKILL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STIMULUS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 34247197746     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: 14640635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440600872001     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Anderson, M. C., & Bell, T. (2001). Forgetting our facts: The role of inhibitory processes in the loss of propositional knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 544-570.
2. Benjamin, A. S. (2005). Response speeding mediates the contributions of cue familiarity and target retrievability to metamneumonic judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 874-879.
3. Butterworth, B., Zorzi, M., Girelli, L., & Jonckheere, A. R. (2001). Storage and retrieval of addition facts: The role of number comparison. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1005-1029.
4. Campbell, J. I. D. (1994). Architectures for numerical cognition. Cognition, 53, 1-44.
5. Campbell, J. I. D., & Austin, A. (2002). Effects of response time deadlines on adults' strategy choices for simple addition. Memory and Cognition, 30, 988 -994.
6. Campbell, J. I. D., & Fugelsang, J. (2001). Strategy choice for arithmetic verification: Effects of numerical surface form. Cognition, 80, B21-B30.
7. Campbell, J. I. D., & Gunter, R. (2002). Calculation, culture, and the repeated operand effect. Cognition, 86, 71-96.
8. Campbell, J. I. D., Parker, H. R., & Doetzel, N. L. (2004). Interactive effects of numerical surface form and operand parity in cognitive arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 51-64.
9. Campbell, J. I. D., & Penner-Wilger, M. (2006). Calculation latency: The mu of memory and the tau of transformation. Memory and Cognition, 34, 217-226.
10. Campbell, J. I. D., & Timm, J. C. (2000). Adults' strategy choices for simple addition: Effects of retrieval interference. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 692-699.
11. Campbell, J. I. D., & Xue, Q. (2001). Cognitive arithmetic across cultures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 299-315.
12. Geary, D. C. (1996). The problem-size effect in mental addition: Developmental and cross-national trends. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 63-93.
13. Hecht, S. A. (1999). Individual solution processes while solving addition and multiplication math facts in adults. Memory and Cognition, 27, 1097-1107.
14. Kirk, E. P., & Ashcraft, M. H. (2001). Telling stories: The perils and promise of using verbal reports to study math strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 157-175.
15. Koriat, A., & Levy-Sadot, R. (2001). The combined contributions of the cue-familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feelings of knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 34-53.
16. LeFevre, J., Bisanz, J., Daley, K., Buffone, L., Greenham, S., & Sadesky, G. (1996). Multiple routes to solution of single-digit multiplication problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 284-306.
17. LeFevre, J., Lei, Q., Smith-Chant, B. L., & Mullins, D. B. (2001). Multiplication by eye and by ear for Chinese-speaking and English-speaking adults. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 285-295.
18. LeFevre, J., & Liu, J. (1997). The role of experience in numerical skill: Multiplication performance in adults from China and Canada. Mathematical Cognition, 3, 31-62.
19. LeFevre, J., Sadesky, G. S., & Bisanz, J. (1996). Selection of procedures in mental addition: Reassessing the problem size effect in adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 216-230.
20. Logan, G. D., & Klapp, S. T. (1991). Automatizing alphabet arithmetic: I. Is extended practice necessary to produce automaticity? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 179-195.
21. Noël, M.-P., Fias, W., & Brysbaert, M. (1997). About the influence of the presentation format on arithmetical-fact retrieval processes. Cognition, 63, 335-374.
22. Phenix, T. L., & Campbell, J. I. D. (2004). Effects of multiplication practice on product verification: Integrated structures model or retrieval-induced forgetting. Memory and Cognition, 32, 324-335.
23. Reder, L. M., & Ritter, F. E. (1992). What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 435-452.
24. Rickard, T. C. (2005). A revised identical elements model of arithmetic fact representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 250-257.
25. Schunn, C. D., Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Richards, D. R., & Stroffolino, P. J. (1997). To calculate or not to calculate: A source activation confusion model of problem familiarity's role in strategy selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 3-29.
26. Seyler, D. J., Kirk, E. P., & Ashcraft, M. H. (2003). Elementary subtraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1339-1352.
27. Shrager, J., & Siegler, R. S. (1998). SCADS: A model of children's strategy choices and strategy discoveries. Psychological Science, 9, 405-410.
28. Siegler, R. S., & Lemaire, P. (1997). Older and younger adults' strategy choices in multiplication: Testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 71-92.
29. Siegler, R. S., & Shipley, C. (1995). Variation, selection, and cognitive change. In G. Halford & T. Simon (Eds.), Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modelling (pp. 31-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
30. Sohn, M.-O., & Carlson, R. (1998). Procedural frameworks for simple arithmetic skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1052-1067.
31. Zbrodoff, N. J. (1995). Why is 9+7 harder than 2+3? Strength and interference as explanations of the problem-size effect. Memory and Cognition, 23, 689-700.
32. Zbrodoff, N. J., & Logan, G. D. (2005). What everyone finds: The problem-size effect. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), The handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 331-346). New York: Psychology Press.