Fast, automatic, procedure-level performance tuning

Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques - Conference Proceedings, PACT

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 173-181

  Pan, Zhelong ^a   Eigenmann, Rudolf ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic compilation; Optimization orchestration; Performance tuning

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC COMPILATION; FAST TUNING SPEED; OPTIMIZATION ORCHESTRATION; PERFORMANCE TUNING;

ALGORITHMS; CODES (SYMBOLS); COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; FEEDBACK; OPTIMIZATION;

PROGRAM COMPILERS;

EID: 34247168194     PISSN: 1089795X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1152154.1152182     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. K. Chow and Y. Wu. Feedback-directed selection and characterization of compiler optimizations. In Second Workshop on Feedback Directed Optimizations, Israel, November 1999.
2. K. D. Cooper, M. W. Hall, and K. Kennedy. A methodology for procedure cloning. Computer Languages, 19(2):105-117, 1993.
3. S. L. Graham, P. B. Kessler, and M. K. McKusick. gprof: a call graph execution profiler. In SIGPLAN Symposium on Compiler Construction, pages 120-126, 1982.
4. E. D. Granston and A. Holler. Automatic recommendation of compiler options. In 4th Workshop on Feedback-Directed and Dynamic Optimization (FDDO-4), December 2001.
5. A. Hedayat, N. Sloane, and J. Stufken. Orthogonal Arrays: Theory and Applications. Springer, 1999.
6. T. Kisuki, P. M. W. Knijnenburg, M. F. P. O'Boyle, F. Bodin, and H. A. G. Wijshoff. A feasibility study in iterative compilation. In International Symposium on High Performance Computing (ISHPC'99), pages 121-132, 1999.
7. Z. Pan and R. Eigenmann. Rating compiler optimizations for automatic performance tuning. In SC2004: High Performance Computing, Networking and Stomge Conference, page (10 pages), November 2004.
8. Z. Pan and R. Eigenmann. Fast and effective orchestration of compiler optimizations for automatic performance tuning. In The 4th Annual International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization (CGO), page (12 pages), March 2006.
9. R. P. J. Pinkers, P. M. W. Knijnenburg, M. Haneda, and H. A. G. Wijshoff. Statistical selection of compiler options. In The IEEE Computer Society's 12th Annual International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunications Systems (MASCOTS'04), Pages 494-501, Volendam, The Netherlands, October 2004.
10. M. Stephenson, S. Amarasinghe, M. Martin, and U.-M. O'Reilly. Meta optimization: improving compiler heuristics with machine learning. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 2003 conference on Programming language design and implementation, pages 77-90. ACM Press, 2003.
11. S. Triantafyllis, M. Vachharajani, N. Vachharajani, and D. I. August. Compiler optimization-space exploration. In Proceedings of the international symposium on Code generation and optimization, pages 204-215, 2003.
12. R. C. Whaley and J. Dongarra. Automatically tuned linear algebra software. In SuperComputing 1998: High Performance Networking and Computing, 1998.