Rating Compiler Optimizations for Automatic Performance Tuning

Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE SC 2004 Conference: Bridging Communities

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages

  Pan, Zhelong ^a   Eigenmann, Rudolf ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; CODES (SYMBOLS);

AUTOMATIC PERFORMANCE TUNING; COMPILER OPTIMIZATIONS; FEED-BACK DIRECTED APPROACH; MODEL RELATIONSHIPS; OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES; PERFORMANCE TUNING SYSTEMS; PROGRAM EXECUTION; PROGRAM PERFORMANCE;

PROGRAM COMPILERS;

EID: 84934311802     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SC.2004.47     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. William Blume and Rudolf Eigenmann. Symbolic range propagation. In the 9th International Parallel Processing Symposium, pages 357-363, 1995.
2. Kingsum Chow and Youfeng Wu. Feedback-directed selection and characterization of compiler optimizations. In Second Workshop on Feedback Directed Optimizations, 20DUMMYIsrael, November 1999.
3. Keith D. Cooper, Devika Subramanian, and Linda Torczon. Adaptive optimizing compilers for the 21st century. The Journal of Supercomputing, 23(1):7-22, 2002.
4. Pedro C. Diniz and Martin C. Rinard. Dynamic feedback: An effective technique for adaptive computing. In SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pages 71-84, 1997.
5. Free Software Foundation, http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.3.3/gcc/. GCC online documentation, 2003.
6. Elana D. Granston and Anne Holler. Automatic recommendation of compiler options. In 4th Workshop on Feedback-Directed and Dynamic Optimization (FDDO-4). December 2001.
7. Brian Grant, Matthai Philipose, Markus Mock, Craig Chambers, and Susan J. Eggers. An evaluation of staged run-time optimizations in dyc. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 1999 conference on Programming language design and implementation, pages 293-304. ACM Press, 1999.
8. Toru Kisuki, Peter M. W. Knijnenburg, Michael F. P. O'Boyle, Francois Bodin, and Harry A. G. Wijshoff. A feasibility study in iterative compilation. In ISHPC, pages 121-132, 1999.
9. Peter Lee and Mark Leone. Optimizing ML with run-time code generation. In SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pages 137-148, 1996.
10. Markus Mock, Craig Chambers, and Susan J. Eggers. Calpa: a tool for automating selective dynamic compilation. In International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pages 291-302, 2000.
11. Zhelong Pan and Rudolf Eigenmann. Compiler optimization orchestration for peak performance. Technical Report TR-ECE-04-01, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, 2004.
12. Mark Stephenson, Saman Amarasinghe, Martin Martin, and Una-May O'Reilly. Meta optimization: improving compiler heuristics with machine learning. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 2003 conference on Programming language design and implementation, pages 77-90. ACM Press, 2003.
13. Spyridon Triantafyllis, Manish Vachharajani, Neil Vachharajani, and David I. August. Compiler optimization-space exploration. In Proceedings of the international symposium on Code generation and optimization, pages 204-215, 2003.
14. Michael Voss and Rudolf Eigenmann. ADAPT: Automated de-coupled adaptive program transformation. In International Conference on Parallel Processing, pages 163-170, 2000.
15. Michael J. Voss and Rudolf Eigemann. High-level adaptive program optimization with ADAPT. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 36(7):93-102, 2001.
16. R. Clint Whaley and Jack J. Dongarra. Automatically tuned linear algebra software. Technical Report UT-CS-97-366, 1997.
17. Kamen Yotov, Xiaoming Li, Gang Ren, Michael Cibulskis, Gerald De Jong, Maria Garzaran, David Padua, Keshav Pingali, Paul Stodghill, and Peng Wu. A comparison of empirical and model-driven optimization. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 2003 conference on Programming language design and implementation, pages 63-76. ACM Press, 2003.