Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension for urodynamic stress incontinence

Neurourology and Urodynamics

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 158-169

  Tan, Emile ^a   Tekkis, Paris P ^a   Cornish, Julie ^a   Teoh, Tiong G ^a   Darzi, Ara W ^a   Khullar, Vik ^a  

^a ST MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Burch; Colposuspension; Comparative; Laparoscopic

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLADDER INJURY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLPOSUSPENSION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; META ANALYSIS; MORBIDITY; STRESS INCONTINENCE; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL RISK; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URODYNAMICS; WORK RESUMPTION;

CLINICAL TRIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PUBLICATION BIAS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RECURRENCE; RISK; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 34247168031     PISSN: 07332467     EISSN: 15206777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nau.20398     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alcalay M, Monga A, Stanton SL. 1995. Burch colposuspension: A 10-20 year follow up. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 102:740-5.
2. Ankardal M, Ekerydh A, Crafoord K. 2004. A randomised trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence. BJOG 111:974-81.
3. Ankardal M, et al. 2005. A three-armed randomized trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using sutures and laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 84:773-9.
4. Athanasiou T, et al. 2004. Off-pump myocardial revascularization is associated with less incidence of stroke in elderly patients. Ann Thorac Surg 77:745-53.
5. Bezerra CA, et al. 2004. Laparoscopic Burch surgery: Is there any advantage in relation to open approach? Int Braz J Urol 30:230-6.
6. Burch JC. 1961. Urethrovaginal fixation to Coopers ligament for correction of stress incontinence, cystocele, and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 81:281-90.
7. Burton G. 1997. A three year prospective randomised urodynamic study comparing open & laparoscopic colposuspension. Neurourol Urodyn 16:253-4.
8. Carey M. 2000. Laparoscopic versus open colposuspension: A prospective multicentre randomised single-blind comparison. Neurourol Urodyn 19:389-91.
9. Carey MP, et al. 2006. Laparoscopic versus open Burch colposuspension: A randomised controlled trial. BJOG 113:999-1006.
10. Cheon WC, Mak JH, Liu JY. 2003. Prospective randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open colposuspension. Hong Kong Med J 9:10-4.
11. Cherqui D. 2003. Laparoscopic liver resection. Br J Surg 90:644-6.
12. Clarke M, Horton R. 2001. Bringing it all together: Lancet-Cochrane collaborate on systematic reviews. Lancet 357:1728.
13. DerSimonian R, Laird N. 1986. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177-88.
14. Egger M, et al. 1997. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629-34.
15. Egger M, Smith GD. 1995. Misleading meta-analysis. BMJ 311:753-4.
16. Fatthy H, et al. 2001, Modified Burch colposuspension: Laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 8:99-106.
17. Hegde SS. 2006. Muscarinic receptors in the bladder: From basic research to therapeutics. Br J Pharmacol 147:S80-7.
18. Huang WC, Yang JM. 2004. Anatomic comparison between laparoscopic and open Burch colposuspension for primary stress urinary incontinence. Urology 63:676-81; discussion 681.
19. Kohli N, et al. 1997. Open compared with laparoscopic approach to Burch colposuspension: A cost analysis. Obstet Gynecol 90:411-5.
20. Lobel RW, Davis GD. 1997. Long-term results of laparoscopic Burch urethropexy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 4:341-5.
21. Loveridge K, et al. 1997. Laparoscopic colposuspension. Is it cost-effective? Surg Endosc 11:762-5.
22. Mantel N, Haenszel W. 1959. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22:719-48.
23. McDougall EM, et al. 1999. Laparoscopic bladder neck suspension fails the test of time. J Urol 162:2078-81.
24. Miannay E, et al. 1998. Comparison of open retropubic and laparoscopic colposuspension for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 79:159-66.
25. Moehrer B, Carey M, Wilson D. 2003. Laparoscopic colposuspension: A systematic review. BJOG 110:230-5.
26. Mostwin JL, et al. 1995. Radiography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging for stress incontinence. Contributions, uses, and limitations. Urol Clin North Am 22:539-49.
27. Ou CS, Presthus J, Beadle E. 1993. Laparoscopic bladder neck suspension using hernia mesh and surgical staples. J Laparoendosc Surg 3:563-6.
28. Paraiso MF, et al. 2004. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus tension-free vaginal tape: A randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 104:1249-58.
29. Paraiso MF. 2006. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension and the tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 18:385-90.
30. Persson J, Wolner-Hanssen P. 2000. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence: A randomized comparison of one or two sutures on each side of the urethra. Obstet Gynecol 95:151-5.
31. Polascik TJ, et al. 1995. Comparison of laparoscopic and open retropubic urethropexy for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Urology 45: 647-52.
32. Saidi MH, et al. 1998. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic colposuspension: Short-term cure rate, complications, and duration of hospital stay in comparison with Burch colposuspension. Obstet Gynecol 92:619-21.
33. Smith A, et al. 2005. A prospective randomised controlled trial of open and laparoscopic colposuspension. Neurourol Urodyn 24:422-3.
34. Stroup DF, et al. 2000. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008-12.
35. Su TH, et al. 1997. Prospective comparison of laparoscopic and traditional colposuspensions in the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 76:576-82.
36. Summitt R, et al. 2000. Randomised comparison of laparoscopic and transabdominal Burch urethropexy for the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 95:2S.
37. Ustun Y, et al. 2003. Tension-free vaginal tape compared with laparoscopic Burch urethropexy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 10:386-9.
38. Valpas A, et al. 2004. Tension-free vaginal tape and laparoscopic mesh colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 104: 42-9.
39. Vancaille T, Schuessler W. 1991. Laparoscopic bladder neck suspension. J Laparoendosc Surg 1:169-73.
40. ven Kerrebroeck P, et al. 2002. Standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:179-83.
41. Versi E. 1992."Gold standard" is an appropriate term. BMJ 305:187.
42. Walter AJ, et al. 2002. Laparoscopic versus open Burch retropubic urethropexy: Comparison of morbidity and costs when performed with concurrent vaginal prolapse repairs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:723-8.
43. Wells G, et al. 2000. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of non-randomized studies in meta-analyses. Paper presented at 3rd symposium of systematic reviews: Beyond the basics. Oxford.
44. Wheelahan JB. 1990. Long-term results of colposuspension. Br J Urol 65: 329-32.
45. Yusuf S, et al. 1985. Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trials. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 27:335-71.