Laparoscopic bladder neck suspension fails the test of time

Journal of Urology

Volumn 162, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 2078-2081

  McDougall, Elspeth M ^a   Heidorn, Cindy A ^a   Portis, Andrew J ^a   Klutke, Carl G ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Laparoscopy; Urinary incontinence

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLADDER CAPACITY; BLADDER NECK; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESIDUAL URINE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STRESS INCONTINENCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 0032752568     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68105-0     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Wagner, T. H. and Hu, T. W.: Economics costs of urinary incontinence in 1995. Urology, 51: 355, 1998.
2. Ramsey, S. D., Wagner, T. H. and Bavendam, T. G.: Estimated costs of treating stress urinary incontinence in elderly women according to the AHCPR clinical practice guidelines. Amer. J. Man. Care, 2: 147, 1996.
3. Bergman, A. and Elia, G.: Three surgical procedures for genuine stress incontinence: five-year follow-up of a prospective randomized study. Amer. J. Obst. Gynec., 173: 66, 1995.
4. Jarvis, G. J.: Surgery for genuine stress incontinence. Brit. J. Obst. Gynec., 101: 371, 1994.
5. McDougall, E. M., Klutke, C. G. and Cornell, T.: Comparison of transvaginal versus laparoscopic bladder neck suspension for stress urinary incontinence. Urology, 45: 641, 1995.
6. McDougall, E. M.: Correction of stress urinary incontinence: retropubic approach. J. Endourol., 10: 247, 1996.
7. Leach, G. E., Dmochowski, R. R., Appell, R. A., Blaivas, J. G., Hadley, H. R., Luber, K. M., Mostwin, J. L., O'Donnell, P. D., Roehrborn, C. G. and the American Urological Association: Female stress urinary incontinence clinical guidelines panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. J. Urol., 158: 875, 1997.
8. Liu, C. Y. and Paek, W.: Laparoscopic retropubic colposuspension (Burch procedure). J. Amer. Assn. Gynec. Laparosc., 1: 31, 1993.
9. Radomski, S. B. and Herschorn, S.: Laparoscopic Burch bladder neck suspension: early results. J. Urol., 155: 515, 1996.
10. Polascik, T. S., Moore, R. G., Rosenberg, M. T. and Kavoussi, L. R.: Comparison of laparoscopic and open retropubic urethropexy for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Urology, 45: 647, 1995.
11. Das, S.: Comparative outcome analysis of laparoscopic colposuspension, abdominal colposuspension and vaginal needle suspension for female urinary incontinence. J. Urol., 160: 368, 1998.
12. Lobel, R. W. and Davis, G. D.: Long-term results of laparoscopic Burch urethropexy. J. Amer. Assn. Gynec. Laparosc., 4: 341, 1997.
13. Czaplicki, M., Dobronski, P., Torz, C. and Borkowski, A.: Long-term subjective results of Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz procedure. Eur. Urol., 34: 118, 1998.
14. Clemens, J. Q., Stern, J. A., Bushman, W. A. and Schaeffer, A. J.: Long-term results of the Stamey bladder neck suspension: direct comparison with the Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz procedure. J. Urol., 160: 372, 1998.
15. Alcalay, M., Monga, A. and Stanton, S. L.: Burch colposuspension: a 10-20 year follow up. Brit. J. Obst. Gynaec., 102: 740, 1995.
16. Kung, R. C., Lie, K., Lee, P. and Drutz, H. P.: The cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus abdominal Burch procedures in women with urinary stress incontinence. J. Amer. Assn. Gynec. Laparosc., 3: 537, 1996.
17. Graham, R. W. and Wood, N. L.: Laparoscopic bladder neck suspension versus Raz urethropexy: outcomes and patient satisfaction. J. Urol., part 2, 157: 266, abstract 1031, 1997.
18. Garrard, C. L., Clements, R. H., Nanney, L., Davidson, J. M. and Richards, W. O.: Adhesion formation is reduced after laparoscopic surgery. Surg. Endosc., 13: 10, 1999.
19. Farmer, L., Ayoub, M., Warejcka, D., Southerland, S., Freeman, A. and Solis, M.: Adhesion formation after intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal implantation of polypropylene mesh. Amer. Surg., 64: 144, 1998.
20. DeLancey, J. O.: Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Amer. J. Obst. Gynec., 170: 1713, 1994.
21. Cummings, J. M., Boullier, J. A., Parra, R. O. and Wozniak Petrofsky, J.: Leak point pressures in women with urinary stress incontinence: correlation with patient history. J. Urol., 157: 818, 1997.
22. Chaikin, D. C., Rosenthal, J. and Blaivas, J. G.: Pubovaginal fascial sling for all types of stress urinary incontinence: long-term analysis. J. Urol., 160: 1312, 1998.