Cross-validating the Berlin Affective Word List

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 606-609

  Võ, Melissa L H ^a,b   Jacobs, Arthur M ^a   Conrad, Markus ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34147210394     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193892     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. ALTARRIBA, J., BAUER, L. M., & BENVENUTO, C. (1999). Concreteness, context availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 578-602.
2. BAAYEN, R. H., PIEPENBROCK, R., & VAN RUN, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium & University of Pennsylvania.
3. BIRD, H., FRANKLIN, S., & HOWARD, D. (2001). Age of acquisition and imageability ratings for a large set of words, including verbs and function words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 33, 73-79.
4. BONIN, P., BOYER, B., MÉOT, A., FAYOL, M., & DROIT, S. (2004). Psycholinguistic norms for action photographs in French and their relationships with spoken and written latencies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 127-139.
5. BONIN, P., MÉOT, A., AUBERT, L., MALARDIER, N., NIEDENTHAL, P., & CAPELLE- TOCZEK, M.-C. (2003). Normes de concrétude, de valeur d'imagerie, de fréquence subjective et de valence émotionnelle pour 866 mots [Concreteness, imageability, subjective frequency, and emotionality ratings for 866 words]. L'Année Psychologique, 103, 655-694.
6. BONIN, P., PEEREMAN, R., MALARDIER, N., MÉOT, A., & CHALARD, M. (2003). A new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 158-167.
7. CHIARELLO, C., SHEARS, C., & LUND, K. (1999). Imageability and distributional typicality measures of nouns and verbs in contemporary English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 603-637.
8. COHEN, J. D., & MACWHINNEY, B. (1994). PsyScope [Software]. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Psychology.
9. CORTESE, M. J., & FUGETT, A. (2004). Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 384-387.
10. DANION, J.-M., KAUFFMANN-MULLER, F., GRANGÉ, D., ZIMMERMANN, M.-A., & GRETH, P. (1995). Affective valence of words, explicit and implicit memory in clinical depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 34, 227-234.
11. DIETRICH, D. E., EMRICH, H. M., WALLER, C., WIERINGA, B. M., JOHANNES, S., & MÜNTE, T. F. (2000). Emotion/cognition-coupling in word recognition memory of depressive patients: An event-related potential study. Psychiatry Research, 96, 15-29.
12. FERRAND, L. (2001). Nonnes d'associations verbales pour 260 mots "abstraits" [Word association norms for 260 "abstract" words]. L'Année Psychologique, 101, 683-721.
13. GRAF, R., NAGLER, M., & JACOBS, A. M. (2005). Faktorenanalyse von 57 Variablen der visuellen Worterkennung [Factor analysis of 57 variables in visual word recognition]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 213, 205-218.
14. HAGER, W., & HASSELHORN, M. (1994). Über Variablen, die eingeschätzt werden sollen, und über Variablen, die eingeschätzt werden: Emotionalität, Angenehmheit, Prägnanz, Erwünschtheit und Sympathie [On variables that should be estimated and variables that are estimated: Emotionality, pleasantness, meaningfulness, desirability, and likability]. In W. Hager & M. Hasselhorn (Eds.), Handbuch deutschsprachiger Wortnormen (pp. 226-248). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
15. LANG, P. J., BRADLEY, M. M., & CUTHBERT, B. N. (1995). The International Affective Picture System (IAPS). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
16. MARATOS, E. J., ALLAN, K., & RUGG, M. D. (2000). Recognition memory for emotionally negative and neutral words: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1452-1465.
17. NEW, B., PALLIER, C., BRYSBAERT, M., & FERRAND, L. (2004). Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods. Instruments, & Computers, 36, 516-524.
18. NITTONO, H., SUEHIRO, M., & HORI, T. (2002). Word imageability and N400 in an incidental memory paradigm. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 44, 219-229.
19. PAIVIO, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
20. PATVIO, A., YUILLE, J. C., & MADIGAN, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 76(1, Pt. 2), 1-25.
21. RICHARDSON, J. T. E. (1975). The effect of word imageability in acquired dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 13, 281-288.
22. RICHARDSON, M. P., STRANGE, B. A., & DOLAN, R. J. (2004). Encoding of emotional memories depends on amygdala and hippocampus and their interactions. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 278-285.
23. SIEGLE, G. J. (1994). The Balanced Affective Word List Creation Program. Available at www.sci.sdsu.edu/CAL/wordlist.html.
24. SIEGLE, G. J., INGRAM, R. E., & MATT, G. E. (2002). Affective interference: An explanation for negative attention biases in dysphoria? Cognitive Therapy & Research, 26, 73-88.
25. STRAIN, E., & HERDMAN, C. M. (1999). Imageability effects in word naming: An individual differences analysis. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 347-359.
26. WINDMANN, S., DAUM, L., & GÜNTÜ RKÜN, O. (2002). Dissociating prelexical and postlexical processing of affective information in the two hemispheres: Effects of the stimulus presentation format. Brain & Language, 80, 269-286.
27. WINDMANN, S., & KUTAS, M. (2001). Electrophysiological correlates of emotion-induced recognition bias. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 577-592.
28. ZIEGLER, J. C., STONE, G. O., & JACOBS, A. M. (1997). What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29, 600-618.