Does discussion enhance rationality? A report from transportation planning practice

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 69, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 354-367

  Willson, Richard W ^a   Payne, Marianne ^b   Smith, Ellen ^c  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART)   (United States)

^c BART s planning in Contra Costa County   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; PLANNING PRACTICE; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; URBAN PLANNING;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0348164769     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360308976324     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Altschuler, A., 1979. The urban transportation system:Politics and policy innovation, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
2. Anson, G., and Willis, K., 1993. Planning with vision:The development of traffic strategies for Melbourne. Transportation, 20:59–75.
3. Bay Area Rapid Transit District ‘BART’. 1999a. BART strategic plan, Oakland, CA:Author.
4. BART. 1999b. Parking policy development workshop, Oakland, CA:Author.
5. BART. 1999c. Access and Legislation Committee of BART, Oakland, CA:Author. Transcriptions from tapes of August 3 and October 5, 1999 workshop of the Public Affairs
6. BART. 2000a. A parking management policy for BART:Issues and opportunities, Oakland, CA:Author.
7. BART. 2000b. Access management and improvement policy Retrieved from:http://www.bart.gov/about/planning/accessMgmt.asp
8. Brown, H., 1995. “ Rationality ”. In The Oxford companion to philosophy, Edited by:Honderich, T., 744New York:Oxford University Press.
9. Cabanatuan, M., 2001. Between a rock and a BART parking place. San Francisco Chronicle, June 4:A-13
10. Faludi, A., 1987. A decision-centred view of environmental planning, New York:Pergamon Press.
11. Forester, J., 1989. Planning in the face of power, Berkeley:University of California Press.
12. Forester, J., 1999a. The deliberative practitioner:Encouraging participatory planning processes, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
13. Forester, J., 1999. “ Dealing with deep value differences ”. In The consensus building handbook, Edited by:Suskind, L., McKearnan, S., and Thomas-Larner, J., 463–489. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
14. Friedmann, J., 1987. Planning in the public domain, Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
15. Habermas, J., 1979. Communications and the evolution of society, Edited by:McCarthy, T., Boston:Beacon Press.
16. Habermas, J., 1984. The theory of communicative action, Volume 1. Reason and the rationalization of society, Edited by:McCarthy, T., Boston:Beacon Press.
17. Habermas, J., 1987. The theory of communicative action, Volume 2. Lifeworld and system:A critique of functionalist reason, Edited by:McCarthy, T., Boston:Beacon Press.
18. Handy, S., Weston, L., and Song, S., 2001. The education of transportation professionals. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning. November2001, Cleveland, OH.
19. Hanson, S., ed. 1995. The geography of urban transportation, New York:Guilford Press.
20. Harvey, D., 1985. The urbanization of capital, Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
21. Hoch, C., 2002. Evaluating plans pragmatically. Planning Theory, 1:53–75.
22. Healey, P., 1999. Institutional analysis, communicative planning, and shaping places. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19:111–121.
23. Innes, J., 1998. Information in communicative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64:52–63.
24. Innes, J., and Booher, D., 1999. Consensus building and complex adaptive systems:A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65:412–423.
25. Innes, J., and Gruber, J., 1999. Planning strategies in conflict:The case of regional transportation planning in the Bay Area. Paper presented at the 1999 Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning Conference. November1999, Chicago, IL.
26. Langmyhr, T., 2000. The rhetorical side of transport planning. European Planning Studies, 8:669–684.
27. Meyer, M., and Miller, E., 1984. Urban transportation planning:A decision-oriented approach, New York:McGraw-Hill.
28. Meyer, M., and Miller, E., 2001. Urban transportation planning:A decision-oriented approach, New York:McGraw-Hill.
29. Outhwaite, W., 1998. Habermas:A critical introduction, Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
30. Pas, E., 1995. “ The urban transportation planning process ”. In The geography of urban transportation, 2nd ed, Edited by:Hanson, S., 53–80. New York:Guilford Press.
31. Wachs, M., 1985a. When planners lie with numbers. Journal of the American Planning Association., 55:476–479.
32. Wachs, M., 1985b. Planning, organizations and decision-making:A research agenda. Transportation Research A, 19A:521–531.
33. Wachs, M., 1995. “ The political context of transportation policy ”. In The geography of urban transportation, 2nd ed, Edited by:Hanson, S., 269–286. New York:Guilford Press.
34. Weiner, E., 1999. Urban transportation planning in the United States:An historical overview, Westport, CT:Praeger.
35. Willson, R., 2001. Assessing communicative rationality as a transportation planning paradigm. Transportation, 28:1–31.
36. Younger, K., and O'Neill, C., 1998. Making the connection:The transportation improvement program and the long-range transportation plan. Transportation Research Record, 1617:118–121.