Factors associated with excessive migration in bone impaction hip revision surgery: A radiostereometric analysis study

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 17, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 826-833

  Nelissen, Rob G H H ^a   Valstar, Edward R ^a   Pöll, Ruud G ^a   Garling, Eric H ^a   Brand, Ronald ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bone impaction grafting; Cemented hip revision; Migration; Tapered polished stems

Indexed keywords

CEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE GRAFT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DISEASE; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MEASUREMENT; PROSTHESIS; RISK FACTOR; STEREOMETRY; STRESS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 0036789460     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/arth.2002.34532     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Malchau H, Herberts P, Soderman P, Oden A: Prognosis of total hip replacement: update and validation of results from the Swedish national hip arthroplasty registry 1979-1998. 67th AAOS meeting, Orlando, 2000
2. Schmalzried TP, Kwong LM, Jasty M, et al: The mechanism of loosening of cemented acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty: analysis of specimens retrieved at autopsy. Clin Orthop 274:60, 1992
3. Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RS, et al: Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:14, 1993
4. Ling RS: Femoral reconstruction with morcellized bone graft and cemented stem. Chir Organi Mov 79:305, 1994
5. Mikhail WE, Weidenhielm LR, Wretenberg P, et al: Femoral bone regeneration subsequent to impaction grafting during hip revision: histologic analysis of a human biopsy specimen. J Arthroplasty 14:849, 1999
6. Nelissen RG, Bauer TW, Weidenhielm LR, et al: Revision hip arthroplasty with the use of cement and impaction grafting: histological analysis of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:412, 1995
7. Buma P, Lamerigts N, Schreurs BW, et al: Impacted graft incorporation after cemented acetabular revision: histological evaluation in 8 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 67:536, 1996
8. Schreurs BW, Buma P, Huiskes R, et al: Morsellized allografts for fixation of the hip prosthesis femoral component: a mechanical and histological study in the goat. Acta Orthop Scand 65:267, 1994
9. Eldridge JD, Smith EJ, Hubble MJ, et al: Massive early subsidence following femoral impaction grafting. J Arthroplasty 12:535, 1997
10. Masterson EL, Masri BA, Duncan CP: The cement mantle in the Exeter impaction allografting technique: a cause for concern. J Arthroplasty 12:759, 1997
11. Lamerigts NM, Buma P, Sardar R, et al: Viability of the acetabular bone bed at revision surgery following cemented primary arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 13:524, 1998
12. Schimmel JW, Buma P, Versleyen D, et al: Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morselized cancellous allografts in cemented hip arthroplasty: a histological and biomechanical study on the goat. J Arthroplasty 13:438, 1998
13. Pak JH, Paprosky WG, Jablonsky WS, Lawrence JM: Femoral strut allografts in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 295:172, 1993
14. Slooff TJ, Buma P, Schreurs BW, et al: Acetabular and femoral reconstruction with impacted graft and cement. Clin Orthop 324:108, 1996
15. Harris WH: Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and ascetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737, 1969
16. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC: "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 141:17, 1979
17. Ramaniraka NA, Rakotomanana LR, Leyvraz PF: The fixation of the cemented femoral component: effects of stem stiffness, cement thickness and roughness of the cement-bone surface. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:297, 2000
18. Ebramzadeh E, Sarmiento A, McKellop HA, et al: The cement mantle in total hip arthroplasty: analysis of long-term radiographic results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:77, 1994
19. Jasty M, Maloney WJ, Bragdon CR, et al: The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:551, 1991
20. Star MJ, Colwell CW Jr, Kelman GJ, et al: Suboptimal (thin) distal cement mantle thickness as a contributory factor in total hip arthroplasty femoral component failure: a retrospective radiographic analysis favoring distal stem centralization. J Arthroplasty 9:143, 1994
21. Joshi RP, Eftekhar NS, McMahon DJ, Nercessian OA: Osteolysis after Charnley primary low-friction arthroplasty: a comparison of two matched paired groups. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:585, 1998
22. Valstar ER: Digital roentgen stereophotogrammetry: development, validation, and clinical application. Leiden University, 2001
23. Vrooman HA, Valstar ER, Brand GJ, et al: Fast and accurate automated measurements in digitized stereophotogrammetric radiographs. J Biomech 31:491, 1998
24. Valstar ER, Vrooman HA, Toksvig-Larsen S, et al: Digital automated RSA compared to manually operated RSA. J Biomech 33:1593, 2000
25. Malkani AL, Voor MJ, Fee KA, Bates CS: Femoral component revision using impacted morsellised cancellous graft: a biomechanical study of implant stability. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:973, 1996
26. Alfaro-Adrian J, Gill HS, Murray DW: Cement migration after THR: a comparison of charnley elite and exeter femoral stems using RSA. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:130, 1999
27. Ornstein E, Franzen H, Johnsson R, Sundberg M: Radiostereometric analysis in hip revision surgeryoptimal time for index examination: 6 patients revised with impacted allografts and cement followed weekly for 6 weeks. Acta Orthop Scand 71:360, 2000
28. Fowler JL, Gie GA, Lee AJ, Ling RS: Experience with the Exeter total hip replacement since 1970. Orthop Clin North Am 19:477, 1988
29. Ballard WT, Callaghan JJ, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC: The results of improved cementing techniques for total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years old: a ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:959, 1994
30. Barrack RL, Castro F, Guinn S: Cost of implanting a cemented versus cementless femoral stem. J Arthroplasty 11:373, 1996
31. Huiskes R: The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown and cemented femoral stems. Clin Orthop 261:27, 1990
32. Giesen EB, Lamerigts NM, Verdonschot N, et al: Mechanical characteristics of impacted morsellised bone grafts used in revision of total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:1052, 1999
33. Karrholm J, Borssen B, Lowenhielm G, Snorrason F: Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:912, 1994