Neither Shareholder nor Stakeholder Management:. What Happens When Firms are Run for their Short-term Salient Stakeholder?

European Management Journal

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 146-162

  Vilanova, Laurent ^a  

^a EA 4161   (France)

Author keywords

Corporate Governance; Role of Management; Shareholder Theory; Stakeholder Theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 34047265019     PISSN: 02632373     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2007.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Agle B., Mitchell R., and Sonnenfeld J. Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal 42 5 (1999) 507-525
2. Anguera R. The Channel Tunnel - an ex post economic evaluation. Transportation Research Part A 40 (2006) 291-315
3. Aoki M. The Economic Analysis of the Japanese Firm (1984), North-Holland, Amsterdam
4. Berglöf, E. and Von Thadden, E.-L. (1999) The changing corporate governance paradigm: Implications for transition and developing countries. Paper presented to Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington D.C. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=183708.
5. Charreaux G., and Desbrières P. Corporate governance: Stakeholder value versus shareholder value. Journal of Management and Governance 5 2 (2001) 107-128
6. Davis J., Schoorman F., and Donaldson L. Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review 22 1 (1997) 20-47
7. Dewatripont M., and Legros P. Public-private partnerships: Contract design and risk transfer. European Investment Bank Papers 10 1 (2005) 120-145
8. Donaldson L. The ethereal hand: Organizational economics and management theory. Academy of Management Review 15 3 (1990) 369-381
9. Donaldson T. Making stakeholder theory whole. Academy of Management Review 24 2 (1999) 237-241
10. Donaldson T., and Preston L. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review 20 1 (1995) 65-91
11. Esty, B. (2003) The Economic motivations for using project finance. Unpublished working paper, Harvard Business School.
12. Esty B. Why study large projects? An introduction to research on project finance. European Financial Management 10 2 (2004) 26-42
13. Fama E., and Jensen M. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26 (1983) 301-325
14. Flyvberg B., Holm M.C., and Buhl S. Underestimating costs in public works projects. Journal of the American Planning Association 68 3 (2002) 279-295
15. Flyvberg B., Bruzelius N., and Rothengatter W. Megaprojects and risk: an anatomy of ambition (2003), Cambridge University Press
16. Freeman R.E. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach (1984), Pitman, Boston
17. Freeman R.E., and Evan W.M. Corporate governance: a stakeholder interpretation. Journal of Behavioral Economics 19 4 (1990) 337-359
18. Frooman J. Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review 24 2 (1999) 191-205
19. Genus A. Managing large-scale technology and inter-organizational relations: The case of the Channel Tunnel. Research Policy 26 (1997) 169-189
20. Grant M. Financing Eurotunnel. Japan Railway & Transport Review (1997) 46-52
21. Hart O., and Moore J. Property rights and the nature of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 98 (1990) 1119-1158
22. Hill C.W., and Jones T.M. Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies 29 2 (1992) 131-154
23. Jensen M. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review 76 2 (1986) 323-329
24. Jensen M. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance 48 3 (1993) 831-880
25. Jensen M. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 14 3 (2001) 8-21
26. Jensen M., and Meckling W. Theory of the firm, managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (1976) 305-360
27. Jensen M., and Meckling W. The Nature of Man. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance Summer (1994) 4-19
28. Jones T., and Wicks A. Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review 24 2 (1999) 206-221
29. Kirkland C. The Channel Tunnel - Lessons learned. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 10 1 (1995) 5-6
30. Kleimeier S., and Megginson W. Are project finance loans different from other syndicated credits?. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 13 1 (2000) 75-87
31. Kochan T., and Rubinstein S. Toward a stakeholder theory of the firm: The Saturn Partnership. Organization Science 11 4 (2000) 367-386
32. Mitchell R., Agle B., and Wood D. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review 22 (1997) 853-886
33. Pajunen, K. (2006) Stakeholder influences in organizational survival. Forthcoming in Journal of Management Studies.
34. Pfeffer J., and Salancik G.R. The external control of organizations (1978), Harper & Row
35. Preston L. Agents, stewards and stakeholders. Academy of Management Review 23 1 (1998) 9
36. Rappaport A. The staying power of the public corporation. Harvard Business Review 68 1 (1990) 96-104
37. Shleifer A., and Vishny R. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance 52 2 (1997) 737-783
38. Stonham P. The Eurotunnel Rights Issue. Part One: Strategy. European Management Journal 13 2 (1995) 201-211
39. Tirole J. Corporate governance. Econometrica 69 1 (2001) 1-35
40. Tirole J. The theory of corporate finance (2006), Princeton University Press
41. Williamson O. Strategizing, economizing, and economic organization. Strategic Management Journal 12 (1991) 75-94
42. Winch, G. (1998) The Channel fixed link: Le projet du siècle. Unpublished case study, Manchester University.