Variation in Dutch: From written MOGELIJK to spoken MOK

Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 183-223

  Keune, Karen ^a   Ernestus, Mirjam ^a   Van Hout, Roeland ^a   Baayen, R Harald ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34047247378     PISSN: 16137027     EISSN: 16137035     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/cllt.2005.1.2.183     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Anshen, Frank and Mark Aronoff 1997 Morphology in real time. In Geert E. Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Year-book of Morphology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 9-12.
2. 1999 Using dictionaries to study the mental lexicon. Brain and Language 68, 16-26.
3. Baayen, R. Harald 2003 Probabilistic approaches to morphology. In Rens Bod, Jennifer Hay and Stefanie Jannedy (eds.), Probabilistic Linguistics. The MIT Press, 229-287.
4. 1994 Derivational productivity and text typology. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 1, 16-34.
5. 2004 Statistics in psycholinguistics: A critique of some current gold standards. Mental Lexicon Working Papers, 1-45.
6. Baayen, R. Harald, Hans van Halteren, Anneke Neijt and Fiona Tweedie 2002 An experiment in authorship attribution. In: Proceedings of JADT 2002. St. Malo: Université de Rennes, 29-37.
7. Baayen, R. Harald, Hans van Halteren and Fiona Tweedie 1996 Outside the cave of shadows: Using syntactic annotation to enhance authorship attribution. Literary and Linguistic Computing 11, 121-131.
8. Bauer, Laurie 2001 Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Biber, Douglas 1988 Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. 1995 Dimensions of Register Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Browman, Catherine and Louis Goldstein 1995 Dynamics and articulatory phonology. In Tim van Gelder and Robert Port (eds.), Mind as Motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 175-193.
12. Burrows, John F. 1986 Modal verbs and moral principles: An aspect of Jane Austen's style. Literary and Linguistic Computing 1, 9-23.
13. 1987 Word-patterns and story-shapes: The statistical analysis of narrativestyle. Literary and Linguistic Computing 2, 61-70.
14. 1992a Computers and the study of literature. In Christopher S. Butler (ed.), Computers and Written Texts. Oxford: Blackwell, 167-204.
15. 1992b Not unless you ask nicely: The interpretative nexus between analysis and information. Literary and Linguistic Computing 7, 91-109.
16. 1993a Noisy signals? or signals in the noise? ACH-ALLC Conference Abstracts. Georgetown, 21-23.
17. 1993b Tiptoeing into the infinite: testing for evidence of national differences in the language of English narrative. In Susan Hockey and Nancy Ide (eds.), Research in Humanities Computing '92. London: Oxford University Press.
18. Bybee, Joan L. 2001 Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Subm. Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically"conditioned sound change.
20. Cambier-Langeveld, Tina 2000 Temporal Marking of Accents and Boundaries. Amsterdam: LOT.
21. Chatterjee, Samprit, Ali S. Hadi and Bertram Price 2000 Regression Analysis by Example. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
22. Church, Kenneth W. and Patrick Hanks 1990 Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics 16, 22-29.
23. Ernestus, Mirjam 2000 Voice assimilation and segment reduction in casual Dutch: A Corpus-Based"Study of the Phonology-Phonetics Interface. Utrecht: LOT.
24. Ernestus, Mirjam, R. Harald Baayen, and Robert Schreuder 2002 The recognition of reduced word forms. Brain and Language 81, 162-173.
25. Fougeron, Cécile and Patricia Keating 1997 Articulatory strengthening at the edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101(6), 3728-3740.
26. Gordon, Elizabeth, Margaret Maclagan and Jennifer Hay Forthc. The ONZE Corpus. In: Joan Beal, Karen Corrigan and Hermann Moisl (eds.), Models and Methods in Handling of Unconventional Digital Corpora. Vol. 2. Palgrave.
27. Gregory, Michelle, William D. Raymond, Alan Bell, Eric Fosler-Lussier and Daniel Jurafsky 1999 The effects of collocational strength and contextual predictability in lexical production. In: Sabrina J. Billings, John P. Boyle, and Aaron M. Griffith (eds), Papers from the Thirty-fifth Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Part 1: Papers from the Main Session. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society, 151-166.
28. Grondelaers, Stefan, Katrien Deygers, Hilde van Aken, Vicky van den Heede and Dirk Speelman 2000 Het CONDIV-corpus geschreven Nederlands. Nederlandse Taalkunde 5(4), 356-363.
29. Harrell, Frank E. 2001 Regression Modeling Strategies. Berlin: Springer.
30. Hay, Jennifer and Andrea Sudbury To appear How rhoticity became /r/-sandi. Language.
31. Heine, Bernd and Tania Kuteva 2005 Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Holmes, David. I. 1994 Authorship attribution. Computers and the Humanities 28(2), 87-106.
33. Johnson, Keith 2004 Massive reduction in conversational American English. In Spontaneous"Speech: Data and Analysis. Proceedings of the 1st Session of the 10th International Symposium. Tokyo, Japan: The National International Institute for Japanese Language, 29-54.
34. Jurafsky, Daniel, Alan Bell, Michelle Gregory and William D. Raymond 2001 Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. In Joan Bybee and Paul Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 229-254.
35. Lebart, Ludovic, André Salem and Lisette Berry 1998 Exploring Textual Data. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
36. Kemps, Rachél, Mirjam Ernestus, Robert Schreuder and R. Harald Baayen 2004 Processing reduced word forms: The suffix restoration effect. Brain and"Language 90, 117-127.
37. Manning, Chris and Hinrich Schütze 1999 Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge: MIT Press.
38. Norris, Dennis G. 1994. Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition 52, 189-234.
39. Oostdijk, Nelleke 2002 The design of the Spoken Dutch Corpus. In Pam Peters, Peter Collins, Adam Smith (eds.), New Frontiers of Corpus Research. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 105-112.
40. Pinheiro, José C. and Douglas M. Bates 2000 Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. Statistics and Computing. New York: Springer.
41. Plag, Ingo, Christiane Dalton-Puffer and R. Harald Baayen 1999 Productivity and register. Journal of English Language and Linguistics 3, 209-228.
42. Pluymaekers, Mark, Mirjam Ernestus and R. Harald Baayen to appear Lexical frequency and acoustic reduction in spoken Dutch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
43. Quené, Hugo and Huub van den Bergh 2004 On multi-level modeling of data from repeated measures designs: a tutorial. Speech Communication 43, 103-121.
44. Schreier, Daniel, Elizabeth Gordon, Jennifer Hay and Margaret Maclagan 2003 The regional and linguistic dimension of /hv/ maintenance and loss in early 20th century New Zealand English. English World-Wide 24(2), 245-270.
45. Schultink, Henk 1961 Produktiviteit als morfologisch fenomeen. Forum der Letteren 2, 110-125.
46. Scott, D. R. 1982 Duration as a cue to the perception of a phrase boundary. Journal of the"Acoustical Society of America 71, 996-1007.
47. Van de Velde, Hans, Roeland van Hout, and Marinel Gerritsen 1997 Watching Dutch change: a real time study of variation and change in standard Dutch pronunciation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 1, 361-391.
48. Van Marie, Jaap 1988 Betekenis als factor bij productiviteitsverandering. Spektator 17, 341-359.
49. Verhoeven, Jo, Guy De Pauw and Hanne Kloots 2004 Speech rate in a pluricentric language: A comparison between Dutch in Belgium and the Netherlands. Language and Speech 47(3), 297-308.
50. Zipf, George K. 1935 The Psycho-Biology of Language. Boston: Houghton Miffìn.