Target uncertainty does not lead to more distraction by singletons: Intertrial priming does

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 67, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1354-1361

  Pinto, Yaïr ^a   Olivers, Christian N L ^a   Theeuwes, Jan ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645756522     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193640     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. BACON, W. F., & EGETH, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 5, 485-496.
2. DUNCAN, J., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
3. FOLK, C., REMINGTON, R. W., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control setting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
4. HILLSTROM, A. P. (2000). Repetition effects in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 800-817.
5. HODSOLL, J., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2001). Driving attention with the top down: The relative contribution of target templates to the linear separability effect in the size dimension. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 918-926.
6. KUMADA, T. (2001). Feature-based control of attention: Evidence for two forms of dimension weighting. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 698-708.
7. MALJKOVIC, V., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22, 657-672.
8. MALJKOVIC, V., & NAKAYAMA, K. (2000). Priming of pop-out: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection. Visual Cognition, 7, 571-595.
9. MlLLIKEN, B., JOORDENS, S., MERIKLE, P. M., & SEIFFERT, A. E. (1998). Selective attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming. Psychological Review, 105, 203-229.
10. MORTIER, K., THEEUWES, J., & STARREVELD, P. (2005). Response selection modulates visual search within and across dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 542-557.
11. MÜLLER, H. J., HELLER, D., & ZIEGLER, J. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1-17.
12. NEILL, W. T., VALDES, L. A., TERRY, K. M., & GORFEIN, D. S. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 993-1000.
13. OLIVERS, C. N. L., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2003). Attentional guidance by salient feature singletons depends on intertrial contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 650-657.
14. PASHLER, H. (1988). Cross-dimensional interaction and texture segregation. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 307-318.
15. STERNBERG, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance II (pp. 276-315). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
16. THEEUWES, J. (1991). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 184-193.
17. THEEUWES, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599-606.
18. THEEUWES, J., REIMANN, B., & MORTIER, K. (in press). Visual search for featural singletons: No top-down modulation, only bottom-up priming. Visual Cognition.
19. TIPPER, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571-590.
20. TIPPER, S. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 321-343.
21. WOLFE, J. M., BUTCHER, S. J., LEE, C., & HYLE, M. (2003). Changing your mind: On the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 483-502.
22. YANTIS, S., & EGETH, H. E. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 661-676.