Professional roles and research utilization in paediatric care: Newly graduated nurses experiences

Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 91-97

  Andersson, Nina ^a   Cederfjäll, Claes ^a,b   Jylli, Leena ^a   Kajermo, Kerstin Nilsson ^b   Klang, Birgitta ^c  

^a KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c DANDERYD HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Newly graduated nurses; Professional role; Research utilization paediatric care; Self description

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; NURSE; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSING RESEARCH; PEDIATRIC NURSING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

HUMANS; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSES; NURSING RESEARCH; PEDIATRIC NURSING;

EID: 34047220837     PISSN: 02839318     EISSN: 14716712     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00435.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Tradewell G. Rites of passage: adaptation of nursing graduates to a hospital setting. J Nurs Staff Dev 1996; 12: 183-9.
2. White A. A theoretical framework created from a repertory grid analyses graduate nurses in relation to the feelings they experience in practice. J Adv Nurs 1996; 24: 144-50.
3. Ewens A. Changes in nursing identities: supporting a successful transition. J Nurs Manage 2003; 11: 224-8.
4. Evans K. Expectations of newly qualified nurses. Nurs Stand 2001; 27: 33-38.
5. Benner P, Tanner CA, Chesla CA. Expertise in Nursing Practice Caring, Clinical Judgements and Ethics. 1986, Springer Publishing Company, Inc., New York.
6. Andersson N, Cederfjäll C, Klang B. The novice general nurse's view of working in a paediatric setting: a Swedish experience. Nurse Educ Pract 2005; 5: 191-197.
7. Ellerton ML, Gregor F. A study of transition: the new nurse graduate at 3 months. J Contin Educ Nurs 2003; 34: 103-7.
8. Thomka LA. Graduate nurses' experiences of interactions with professional nursing staff during transition to the professional role. J Contin Educ Nurs 2001; 32: 15-19.
9. Robertsson JF, Cummings CC. What makes long-term-care nursing attractive? Am J Nurs 1991; 91: 41-46.
10. Pfeil M. Preceptorship: the progression from student to staff nurse. J Child Health Care 1999; 3: 13-18.
11. Ramritu PL, Barnard A. New nurse graduates' understanding of competence. Int Counc Nurses Int Nurs Rev 2001; 48: 47-57.
12. Greenwood E. Attributes of a profession. Soc Work 1957; 2: 45-55.
13. Hughes EC. Men and Their Work. 1958, Free Press, New York.
14. Biddle BJ. Role Theory: Expectation, Identities, and Behaviors. 1979, Academic Press, New York.
15. Olsson HM, Gullberg MT. Nursing education and importance of professional status in the nurse role. Expectations and knowledge of the nurse role. Int J Nurs Stud 1988; 25: 287-93.
16. Barnsteiner JH, Wyatt JS. What do paediatric nurses do? Results of the Role Delineation Study in Canada and the United States. Pediatr Nurs 2002; 28: 165-70.
17. McCleary L, Brown GT. Association between nurses' education about research and their research use. Nurse Educ Today 2003; 23: 556-65.
18. Carlson DS, Rouse CL. Staff nurses: using research in everyday practice. J Emerg Nurs 1999; 25: 564-8.
19. Closs SJ, Cheater FM. Evidence for nursing practice: a clarification of the issues. J Adv Nurs 1999; 30: 10-17.
20. Linder K. How a Group of Students' Conceptions of the Nurse Profession Change during Three Years of Studies. (Doctoral Dissertation). Lund Studies in Education. 1999, Lund University Press, Sweden (in Swedish).
21. Björkström ME, Hamrin EKF. Swedish nurses' attitudes towards research and development within nursing. J Adv Nurs 2001; 34: 706-14.
22. McCleary L, Brown GT. Barriers to paediatric nurses' research utilization. J Adv Nurs 2003; 42: 367-72.
23. Haynes RB, Hayward RSA, Lomas J. Bridges between health care research evidence and clinical practice. J Am Med Inf Assoc 1995; 2: 342-50.
24. Parahoo K. Barriers to and facilitators of, research utilization among nurses in Northern Ireland. J Adv Nurs 2000; 31: 89-98.
25. Nilsson Kajermo K, Nordström G, Krusebrandt Å, Björvell H. Barriers to and facilitators of research utilization as perceived by a group of registered nurses in Sweden. J Adv Nurs 1998; 27: 789-807.
26. Relsas A, Nolan M. Barriers to nurses' use of research: an Australian hospital study. Int J Nurs Stud 1999; 36: 335-43.
27. Nilsson Kajermo K, Nordström G, Krusebrandl Å, Björvell H. Perceptions of research utilization: comparison between health care professionals, nursing students and a reference group of nurse clinicians. J Adv Nurs 2000; 31: 99-109.
28. Rodgers SB. A study of the utilization of research in practice and the influence of education. Nurse Bduc Today 2000; 20; 279-87.
29. Dunn V, Chichton N, Williams K, Roe B, Seers K. Using research for practice: a UK experience of the Barriers Scale. J Adv Nurs 1997; 26: 1203-10.
30. Lacey B. Research utilization In nursing practice - a pilot study. J Adv Nurs 1994; 19: 987-995.
31. Björkström M, Johansson IS, Hamrin EKF, Althin EE. Swedish nursing students' attitudes to and awareness of research and development within nursing. J Adv Nurs 2003; 41: 393-402.
32. Ingmire AB. The effectiveness of a leadership programme in nursing. Int J Nurs Stud 1973; 10: 3-19.
33. Dagenais F, Meleis AI. Professionalism, work ethic, and empathy in nursing: The Nurse Self-Description Form. West J Nurs Res 1982; 4; 407-22.
34. Andreasson S, Gullberg MT, Olsson HM, Hamrin E. Medical laboratory technologists' perception of professionals: a study of Swedish MLTs employed in clinical chemistry. Scand J Caring Sci 1992; 6: 67-74.
35. Gullberg MT. From student to nurse: a six-year follow-up of perception and attitudes to professional role. In MT Gullberg Health Care Professionals' Self Description (Doctoral thesis). 1996, Department of Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
36. Gullberg MT. Health Care Professionals' Self Description (Doctoral thesis). 1996, Department of Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
37. Funk SG, Champagne MT, Wiese RA, Tornquist EM. Barriers: barriers research utilization scale. Appl Nurs Res 1991; 4: 39-45.
38. Krosnick JA, Holbrook AL, Berent MK, Carson RT, Hanemann WM, Kropp RJ, Cameron MR, Presser S, Ruud PA, Smith. VK, Moody WR, Green MC, Conaway M. The impact of 'no opinion' response options on data quality: non-attitude reduction or an invitation to satisfies? Public Opin Q 2002; 66: 371-403.