The contribution of rate adaptive pacing with single or dual sensors to health-related quality of life

Europace

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 233-238

  van Hemel, Norbert M ^a   Holwerda, Klaas J ^a   Slegers, Paul C ^a   Spierenburg, Han A M ^a   Timmermans, Alphons A J M ^a   Meeder, Joan G ^a   van der Kemp, Peter ^a   Kelder, Johannes C ^a   Stofmeel, Monique A M ^a  

^a Rodger Crowson Foundation for Cardiac Arrhythmias Studies   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Double sensor; Pacemaker; Pacemaker sensor; QoL and PM sensor; Quality of life; Rate adaptive pacing

Indexed keywords

AMIODARONE; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; CALCIUM ANTAGONIST; DIGOXIN; FLECAINIDE; SOTALOL;

ACCELERATION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE CONDUCTION DISTURBANCE; HEART PACING; HEART RATE; HEART RHYTHM; HUMAN; LUNG MINUTE VOLUME; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SENSOR; SHORT FORM 36; SICK SINUS SYNDROME; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; CARDIAC PACING, ARTIFICIAL; FEMALE; HEART BLOCK; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SICK SINUS SYNDROME; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34047218698     PISSN: 10995129     EISSN: 15322092     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/europace/eum021     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Voukydis PC, Krasner JL. A physiologically regulated cardiac pacemaker. Br J Exp Pathol 1967;48:118-23.
2. Israel CW, Hohloser SH. Current status of dual-sensor pacemaker systems for correction of chronotropic incompetence. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86(Suppl.):86K-94.
3. Lass J, Kalk J, Meigas K, Hinrikus H, Blinowska A. Evaluation of the quality of rate adaptation algorithms for cardiac pacing. Europace 2001;3:221-8.
4. Alt E, Theres H, Heinz M, Matula M, Thilo R, Blamer H. A new rate-modulated pacemaker system optimized by combination of two sensors. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1988;11:1119-29.
5. Leung SK, Lau CP, Tang MO. Cardiac output is a sensitive indicator of difference in exercise performance between single and dual sensor pace-makers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21:35-41.
6. Bonnet JL, Geroux L, Cazeau S. Evaluation of a dual sensor rate responsive pacing system based on a new concept. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21:2198-203.
7. Linde-Edelstam C, Nordlander R, Undén AL, Orth-Gomer K, Rydén L. Quality-of-life in patients treated with atrioventricular synchronous pacing compared to rate modulated ventricular pacing: A long-term, double-blind, crossover study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1992;15: 1467-76.
8. Lamas GA, Orav EJ, Stambler BC, Ellenbogen KA, Sgarbossa EB, Huang SKS et al. Quality of life and clinical outcome in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual-chamber pacing. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1097-104.
9. Connolly SJ, Kerr CR, Gent M, Roberts RS, Yusuf S, Gillis AM et al. Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1385-91.
10. Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweeney MO, Silverman R, Leon A, Yee R et al. Mode selection trial in sinus node-dysfunction. Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction. N EngI J Med 2002;346: 1854-62
11. Newman D, Lau C, Tang ASL, Irvine J, Paquette M, Woodend K et al. Effect of pacing mode on health-related quality of life in the Canadian trial of physiologic pacing. Am Heart J 2003;145:430-7.
12. Gribbin GM, Kenny RA, McCue P, Toff WD, Bexton RS, McComb JM. Individualised quality of life after pacing. Does mode matter? Europace 2004;6:552-60.
13. Newman D. Relationships between pacing mode and quality of life: evidence of randomized clinical trials. Card Electrophysiol Rev 2003; 7:401-5
14. Lopez-Jimenez F, Goldmann L, Orav EJ, Ellenbogen K, Stambler B, Marinchak R et al. Health values before and after pacemaker implantation. Am Heart J 2002; 144:687-92.
15. Sulke N, Dritsas A, Chambers J, Sowton E. Is accurate rate response programming necessary? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1990;13:1031-44.
16. Oto MA, Muderrisoglu H, Ozin MB, Korkmaz ME, Karamehmetoglu A, Oram A et al. Quality of life in patients with rate responsive pacemakers: A randomized, cross-over study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1991;14:800-6.
17. Lau C-P, Tai Y-T, Leung W-H, Wong C-K, Lee P, Chung FL-W. Rate adaptive pacing in sick sinus syndrome: Effects of pacing and intrinsic conduction on physiological responses, arrhythmias, symptomatology and quality of life. Eur Heart J 1994; 15:1445-55.
18. Erol-Yilmaz A, Schrama TA, Tanka JS, Tijssen JG, Wilde AA, Tukkie R. Individual optimization of pacing sensors improves exercise capacity without influencing quality of life. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005;28:17-24.
19. Padaletti L, Pieragnoli P, Di Biase L, Colella A, Landolina M, Moro E et al. Is a dual sensor pacemaker appropriate in patients with sino-atrial disease? Results from the DUSISLOG study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2006;29:34-40.
20. Stofmeel MAM, Post MWM, Kelder JC, Grobbee DE, van Hemel NM. Psychometric properties of Aquarel: A disease specific health related quality of life questionnaire for pacemaker patients. J Clin Epidemiology 2001;54:157-65.
21. Stofmeel MAM, Post MWM, Kelder JC, Grobbee DE, van Hemel NM. Changes in health related quality of life after pacemaker implantation: responsiveness of the Aquarel questionnaire. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2001;24:288-95.
22. Lascault G, Nitzsche R, Ritter P, Remy M, Limousin M. Assistant programming software: A new tool for an improved programming of pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1990;13:1732-6.
23. Limousin M, Geroux L, Nitzsche R, Cazeau S, Pioger G, Victor J et al. Value of automatic processing and reliability of stored data in an implanted pacemaker: Initial results in 59 patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1997;20:2893-8.
24. Limousin M, Pioger G, Bonnet JL, Geroux L. Automatic adaptation of the basic pacing rate in response to minute ventilation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21:1405-9.
25. Freedman RA, Hopper DL, Mah J, Hummel J, Wilkoff BL. Assessment of pacemaker chronotropic response: Implementation of the Wilkoff mathematical model. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2001;24:1748-54.
26. Linde C. How to evaluate quality-of-life in pacemaker patients: Problems and pitfalls. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996;19:391-397.
27. Lukl J, Doupal. V, Sovova E, Lubena L. Incidence and significance of chronotropic incompetence in patients with primary pacemaker implantation or pacemaker replacement. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1999;22:1284-91.
28. Greco EM, Guardini S, Ferrario M, Romano S. How to program rate responsive pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000;23:165-73.