Individualised quality of life after pacing. Does mode matter?

Europace

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 552-560

  Gribbin, Guy M ^a,d   Kenny, R A ^b   McCue, P ^b   Toff, W D ^c   Bexton, R S ^a   McComb, J M ^a  

^a FREEMAN HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL VICTORIA INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^c GLENFIELD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d TORBAY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Karolinska symptomatology questionnaire; Pacemaker; Pacing mode; Quality of life; SEIQoL; SF36

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; AMIODARONE; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; DIPEPTIDYL CARBOXYPEPTIDASE INHIBITOR; PROPAFENONE; SOTALOL; WARFARIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH SURVEY; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART ATRIUM PACING; HEART FAILURE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEART PACING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARDIAC PACING, ARTIFICIAL; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;

EID: 15044362476     PISSN: 10995129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eupc.2004.07.011     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. H.R. Andersen J.C. Nielson P.E. Bloch Tomsen et al. Long-term follow up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick sinus syndrome Lancet 350 1997 1210-6
2. A. Ebagosti M. Gueunoun A. Saadijan M. Gabriel S. Levy J. Torresani Long-term follow-up of patients treated with VVI pacing and sequential pacing with special reference to VA retrograde conduction Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 11 1988 1929-34
3. A. Mattioli D. Vivoli G. Mattioli Influence of pacing modalities on the incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients without prior atrial fibrillation Eur Heart J 19 1998 282-6
4. S. Connolly C. Kerr M. Gent et al. Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes N Eng J Med 342 2000 1385-91
5. G.A. Lamas E.J. Orav B.S. Stambler et al. Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly Investigators Quality of life and clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual-chamber pacing N Engl J Med 338 1998 1097-104
6. W.D. Toff J.D. Skehan D.P. De Bono A.J. Camm The United Kingdom pacing and cardiovascular events (UKPACE) trial Heart 78 1997 221-3
7. D. Newman C. Lau A.S.L. Tang et al. Effect of pacing mode on health-related quality of life in the Canadian trial of physiologic pacing Am Heart J 145 2003 430-7
8. R.G. Charles J.M. McComb Systematic trial of pacing to prevent atrial fibrillation Heart 78 1997 224-5
9. J. Browne C. O'Boyle H. McGee et al. Individual quality of life in the healthy elderly Qual Life Res 3 1994 235-44
10. R. Mayou Quality of life in cardiovascular disease Psychother Psychosom 54 1990 99-109
11. S. Hill U. Harries J. Popay Is the short form 36 (SF-36) suitable for routine health outcomes assessment in health care for older people? Evidence from preliminary work in community based health services in England J Epidemiol Community Health 50 1996 94-8
12. C. Linde-Edelstam R. Nordlander A.L. Undén K. Orth-Gomer L. Rydén Quality-of-life in patients treated with atrioventricular synchronous pacing compared to rate modulated ventricular pacing: A long-term, double-blind, crossover study Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 15 1992 1467-76
13. C. Linde How to evaluate quality-of-life in pacemaker patients: Problems and pitfalls Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19 1996 391-7
14. B. Kirshner G. Guyatt A methodological framework for assessing health indices J Chronic Dis 38 1985 27-36
15. D. Altman Practical statistics for medical research 1st edn. 1991 Chapman & Hall London
16. C. O'Boyle The schedule for the evaluation of individual quality of life (SEIQoL) Int J Ment Health 23 3 1994 3-23
17. C.-P. Lau J. Rushby M. Leigh-Jones et al. Symptomatology and quality of life in patients with rate responsive pacemakers: A double blind, randomised, crossover study Clin Cardiol 12 1989 505-12
18. R.S. Bubien G.N. Kay A randomised comparison of quality of life and exercise capacity with DDD and VVIR pacing modes Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 13 1990 524
19. C. Menozzi M. Brignole P.V. Morracchini et al. Intrapatient comparisons between chronic VVIR and DDD pacing in patients affected by high degree AV block without heart failure Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 13 1990 1816-22
20. K.G. Oldroyd A.P. Rae R. Carter C. Wingate S.M. Cobbe Double blind crossover comparison of the effects of dual chamber pacing (DDD) and ventricular rate adaptive (VVIR) pacing on neuroendocrine variables, exercise performance, and symptoms in complete heart block Br Heart J 65 1991 188-93
21. M.A. Oto H. Muderrisoglu M.B. Ozin et al. Quality of life in patients with rate responsive pacemakers: A randomized, cross-over study Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 14 1991 800-6
22. J.C. Deharo M. Badier X. Thirion et al. A randomized, single-blind crossover comparison of the effects of chronic DDD and dual sensor VVIR pacing mode on quality-of-life and cardiopulmonary performance in complete heart block Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19 1996 1320-6
23. J. Frielingsdorf T. Deseo A.E. Gerber O. Bertel A comparison of quality-of-life in patients with dual chmaber pacemakers and individually programmed atrioventricular delays Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19 1996 1147-54
24. G. Lamas K. Lee M. Sweeney et al. Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus node dysfunction N Engl J Med 246 2002 1854-62
25. H. Smith R. Taylor A. Mitchell A comparison of four quality of life instruments in cardiac patients: SF-36, QLI, QLMI and SEIQoL Heart 84 2000 390-4