An extension to the internal/external frame of reference model to two verbal and numerical domains

European Journal of Psychology of Education

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 467-487

  Möller, Jens ^a   Streblow, Lilian ^b   Pohlmann, Britta ^a   Köller, Olaf ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^b BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Academic achievement; Comparison processes; I E model; Self concept

Indexed keywords

EID: 34047139331     PISSN: 02562928     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03173515     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Bong, M. (1998). Tests of the internal/external frames of reference model with subject-specific academic self-efficacy and frame-specific academic self-concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 102-110.
2. Bong, M., & Clark, R.E. (1999). Comparison between self-concept and self-efficacy in academic motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 34, 139-153.
3. Bong, M. (2001). Between- and within-domain relations of academic motivation among middle and high school students: Self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 23-34.
4. Bryk, A.S., & Raudenbush, S.W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
5. Bryk, A.S., Raudenbush, S.W., & Congdon, R.T. (1994). Hierarchical linear modeling with the HLM/2L and HLM/3L programs. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
6. Cialdini, R.B., & Richardson, K.D. (1980). Two indirect tactics of impression management: Basking and blasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 406-416.
7. Collins, R.L. (1996). For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparisons on self-evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 51-69.
8. Dobbins, G.H., Farh, J.L., & Werbel, J.D. (1993). The influence of self-monitoring and inflation of grade-point averages for research and selection purposes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 321-334.
9. Eccles, J.S. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic choice: Origins and changes. In J. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 87-134). San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
10. Eccles, J., Freedman-Doan, C., Frome, P., Jacobs, J., & Yoon, K.S. (2000). Gender-role socialization in the family: A longitudinal approach. In T. Eckes & H.M. Trautner (Hrsg.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 333-360). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Enders, C.K. (2001). A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 128-141.
12. Faber, G., (1992). Bereichsspezifische Beziehungen zwischen leistungsthematischen Schülerselbstkonzepten und Schulleistungen. [On the relationship between self-concept with regard to spelling and mathematics and related academic variables]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 24, 66-82.
13. Flake, W.L., & Goldman, B.A. (1991). Comparison of grade point averages and SAT scores between reporting and non-reporting men and women and freshmen and sophomores. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 177-178.
14. Frucot, V.G., & Cook, G.L. (1994). Further research on the accuracy of students' self-reported grade point averages, SAT scores, and course grades. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 743-746.
15. Goldman, B.A., Flake, W.L., & Matheson, M.B. (1990). Accuracy of college students' perceptions of their SAT scores and high school and college grade point averages relative to their ability. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70, 514.
16. Goldstein, H. (1987). Multilevel models in educational and social research. London: Griffin.
17. Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models. London: Edward Arnold.
18. Hannover, B. (2001). The Influence of the Image of mathematics and the natural sciences on the development of interest and performance in schools. Paper presented at the 9th European Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Fribourg, Switzerland.
19. Helmke, A. (1992). Selbstvertrauen und schulische Leistungen. [Self-confidence and scholastic achievement]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
20. Hox, J.I., & Kreft, I.G.G. (1994). Multilevel analysis methods, Sociological Methods and Research, 22, 283-299.
21. Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
22. Kirk, B.A., & Sereda, L. (1969). Accuracy of self-reported college grade averages and characteristics of non and discrepant reporters. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29, 147-155.
23. Köller, O. (2004). Konsequenzen schulischer Leistungsgruppierung. [On the consequences of scholastic differentiation]. Münster: Waxmann.
24. Köller, O., Daniels, Z., & Baumert, I. (2000). Multiple frames of reference, academic interests, and coursework selection In upper secondary schools In Germany. Paper presented at the AERA Annual Meeting, New Orleans, April 24-28.
25. Köller, O., Klemmert, H., Möller, J., & Baumert, J. (1999). Eine längsschnittliche Überprüfung des Modells des Internal/External Frame of Reference. [Achievement feedback and academic self-concepts: A longitudinal test of the internal/external frame of reference model]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 13, 128-134.
26. Marsh, H.W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 129-149.
27. Marsh, H.W. (1987).The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 280-295.
28. Marsh, H.W. (1989). Sex differences in the development of verbal and mathematics constructs: The High School and Beyond Study. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 191-225.
29. Marsh, H.W. (1990a). A multidimensional, hierarchical model of self-concept: Theoretical and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 77-172.
30. Marsh, H.W. (1990b). Influences of internal and external frames of reference on the formation of math and English self-concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 107-116.
31. Marsh, H.W., & Köller, O. (2004). Unification of theoretical models of academic self-concept/achievement relations: Reunification of east and west German school systems after the fall of the Berlin Wall, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 264-282.
32. Marsh, H.W., & Yeung, A.S. (1998). Longitudinal structural equation models of academic self-concept and achievement: Gender differences in the development of math and English constructs. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 705-738.
33. Marsh, H.W., & Yeung, A.S. (2001). An extension of the internal/external frame of reference model: A response to Bong (1998). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 389-420.
34. Marsh, H.W., Balla, J.R., & Hau, K.T. (1996). An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In G.A. Marcoulides & R.E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling techniques (pp. 315-353). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Marsh, H.W., Balla, J.R., & McDonald, R.P. (1988). Goodness of fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410.
36. Marsh, H.W., Kong, C.-K., & Hau, K.-T. (2000). Longitudinal multilevel models of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: Counterbalancing contrast and reflected-glory effects in Hong Kong schools. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 337-349.
37. Marsh, H.W., Kong, C.K., & Hau, K. (2001). Extension of the internal/external frame of reference model of self-concept formation: Importance of native and nonnative languages for Chinese students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 543-553.
38. Marsh, H.W., Walker, R., & Debus, R. (1991). Subject-specific components of academic self-concept and self-efficacy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 331-345.
39. Möller, J., & Köller, O. (2000). Spontaneous and reactive attributions according to academic achievement. Social Psychology of Education, 4, 67-86.
40. Möller, J., & Köller, O. (2001 a). Dimensional comparisons: An experimental approach to the Internal/External frame of reference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 826-835.
41. Möller, J., & Köller, O. (2001b). Frame of reference effects following the announcement of exam results. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 277-287.
42. Möller, J., & Köller, O. (2004). Die Genese akademischer Selbstkonzepte: Effekte dimensionaler und sozialer Vergleiche [On the development of academic self-concepts: the impact of social and dimensional comparisons]. Psychologische Rundschau, 55, 19-27.
43. Möller, J., Pohlmann, B., Streblow, L., & Kaufmann, J. (2002). Spezifität von Begabungsüberzeugungen als Determinante des fachbezogenen Selbstkonzepts der Begabung. [Specificity of ability beliefs as determinant of academic self-concepts]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 16, 87-97.
44. Mui, F.L., Yeung, A.S., Low, R., & Jin, P. (2000). Academic self-concept of talented students: Factor structure and applicability of the internal/external frame of reference model. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 343-367.
45. Muthen, B.O. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 22, 376-398.
46. Muthen, B.O. (1997). Latent variable modeling of longitudinal and multilevel data. In A. Raftery (Ed.), Sociological Methodology 1997 (pp. 453-480). Boston, Blackwell Publishers.
47. Plucker, J.A., & Stocking, V.B. (2001), Looking outside and inside: Self-concept development of gifted adolescents. Exceptional Children, 67, 535-548.
48. Raudenbush, S.W., Rowan, B., & Kang, S.J. (1991). A multilevel, multivariate model for studying school climate with estimation via the EM algorithm and application to U.S. High-School data. Journal of Educational Statistics, 16, 295-330.
49. Rubin, D.B. (1987). Multiple imputations for non-response in surveys. New York: Wiley & Sons.
50. Sasaki, M. (1996). Second language proficiency, foreign language aptitude, and intelligence. New York: Lang.
51. Shepperd, J.A. (1993). Student derogation of the Scholastic aptitude test: Biases in perceptions and presentations of College Board scores. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 14, 455-473.
52. Skaalvik, E.M., & Rankin, R.J. (1990). Math, verbal, and general academic self-concept: The internal/external frame of reference model and gender differences in self-concept structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 546-554.
53. Skaalvik, E.M., & Rankin, R.J. (1992). Math and verbal achievement and self-concepts: Testing the internal/external frame of reference model. Journal of Early Adolescence, 12, 267-279.
54. Skaalvik, E.M., & Rankin, R.J. (1995). A test of the internal/external frame of reference model at different levels of math and verbal self-perception. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 161-184.
55. Skaalvik, E.M., & Valas, H. (1999). Relations among achievement, self-concept and motivation in mathematics and language arts. A longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Education, 67, 135-149.
56. Tay, M.P., Licht, B.G., & Tate, R.L. (1995). The internal/external frame of reference in adolescents' math and verbal self-concepts: A generalization study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 392-402.
57. Trice, A.D. (1990). Reliability of students' self-reports of scholastic aptitude scores: Data from juniors and seniors. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 290.
58. Tucker, L.R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10.
59. Williams, J.E., & Montgomery, D. (1995). Using frame of reference theory to understand the self-concept of academically able students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 400-409.
60. Yeung, A.S., Lee, J.C., & Wong, H. (2001). Testing Marsh's (1986) frame of reference model of self-concept with bilingual students. Paper presented at the AERA Annual Meeting, New Orleans, April 24-28.
61. Yeung, A.S., Chui, H.S., Lau, I.C., McInnerney, D., Russell-Bowie, D., & Suliman, R. (2000). Where is the hierarchy of academic self-concept? Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 556-567.
62. Zimmerman, M.A., Caldwell, C.H., & Bernat, D.H. (2002). Discrepancy between self-report and school-record grade point average. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 86-109.