Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes with cervical headgear and mandibular protraction appliance therapy in the treatment of Class II malocclusions

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 131, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 447.e21-447.e30

  Siqueira, Danilo Furquim ^a   de Almeira, Renato Rodrigues ^a   Janson, Guilherme ^a   Brandão, Analu Giampietro ^a   Coelho Filho, Carlos Martins ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34047126474     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.029     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Brown P. A cephalometric evaluation of high-pull molar headgear and face-bow neck strap therapy. Am J Orthod 74 (1978) 621-632
2. Kirjavainen M., Kirjavainen T., Hurmerinta K., and Haavikko K. Orthopedic cervical headgear with an expanded inner bow in Class II correction. Angle Orthod 70 (2000) 317-325
3. Kloehn S.J. Guiding alveolar growth and eruption of teeth to reduce treatment time and produce a more balanced denture and face. Angle Orthod 17 (1947) 10-33
4. Wieslander L. The effect of orthodontic treatment on the concurrent development of craniofacial complex. Am J Orthod 49 (1963) 15-27
5. Tulloch J.F., Proffit W.R., and Phillips C. Influences on the outcome of early treatment for Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 111 (1997) 533-542
6. Coelho Filho C.M. Mandibular protraction appliances for Class II treatment. J Clin Orthod 29 (1995) 319-336
7. Coelho Filho C.M. Clinical applications of the mandibular protraction appliance. J Clin Orthod 31 (1997) 92-102
8. Coelho Filho C.M. The mandibular protraction appliance no. 3. J Clin Orthod 32 (1998) 379-384
9. Coelho Filho C.M. Mandibular protraction appliance IV. J Clin Orthod 35 (2001) 18-24
10. Ghafari J., King G.J., and Tulloch J.F. Early treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion-comparison of alternative treatment modalities. Clin Orthod Res 1 (1998) 107-117
11. Keeling S.D., Wheeler T.T., King G.J., Garvan C.W., Cohen D.A., Cabassa S., et al. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113 (1998) 40-50
12. Haralabakis N.B., Halazonetis D.J., and Sifakakis I.B. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 123 (2003) 296-305
13. Houston W.J. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 83 (1983) 382-390
14. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students (1940), Interscience, New York
15. McNamara J.A., Howe R.P., and Dischinger T.G. A comparison of the Herbst and Frankel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 98 (1990) 134-144
16. Klein P.L. An evaluation of cervical traction on the maxilla and upper first permanent molar. Angle Orthod 27 (1957) 61-68
17. Cook A.H., Sellke T.A., and BeGole E.A. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 106 (1994) 376-388
18. Odom W.M. Mixed dentition treatment with cervical traction and lower lingual arch. Angle Orthod 53 (1983) 329-342
19. Righellis E.G. Treatment effects of Frankel, activator and extraoral traction appliances. Angle Orthod 53 (1983) 107-121
20. Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 82 (1982) 104-113
21. Croft R.S., Buschang P.H., English J.D., and Meyer R. A cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of Herbst treatment in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116 (1999) 435-443
22. Pancherz H. Treatment of Class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance-a cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 76 (1979) 423-442
23. Pancherz H. The Herbst appliance-its biologic effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod 87 (1985) 1-20
24. Ruf S., Hansen K., and Pancherz H. Does orthodontic proclination of lower incisors in children and adolescents cause gingival recession?. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 114 (1998) 100-106
25. Cangialosi T.J., Meistrell M.E., Leung M.A., and Ko J.Y. A cephalometric appraisal of edgewise Class II nonextraction treatment with extraoral force. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 93 (1988) 315-324
26. Kim K.R., and Muhl Z.F. Changes in mandibular growth direction during and after cervical headgear treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 119 (2001) 522-530
27. Baumrind S., Molthen R., West E.E., and Miller D.M. Mandibular plane changes during maxillary retraction. Am J Orthod 74 (1978) 32-40
28. Baumrind S., Korn E.L., Molthen R., and West E.E. Changes in facial dimensions associated with the use of forces to retract the maxilla. Am J Orthod 80 (1981) 17-30
29. Pancherz H. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Swed Dent J 15 Supp (1982) 189-196
30. Schiavoni R., Grenga V., and Macri V. Treatment of Class II high angle malocclusions with the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 102 (1992) 393-409
31. Baumrind S., Korn E.L., Isaacson R.J., West E.E., and Molthen R. Quantitative analysis of the orthodontic and orthopedic effects of maxillary traction. Am J Orthod 84 (1983) 384-398
32. Covell Jr. D.A., Trammell D.W., Boero R.P., and West R. A cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 malocclusions treated with the Jasper jumper appliance. Angle Orthod 69 (1999) 311-320
33. Pancherz H., and Hägg U. Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. An analysis of 70 consecutive cases treated with the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod 88 (1985) 273-287
34. Valant J.R., and Sinclair P.M. Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 95 (1989) 138-147
35. Ben-Bassat Y., Baumrind S., and Korn E.L. Mandibular molar displacement secondary to the use of forces to retract the maxilla. Am J Orthod 89 (1986) 1-12
36. Schiavon Gandini M.R., Gandini Jr. L.G., Da Rosa Martins J.C., and Del Santo Jr. M. Effects of cervical headgear and edgewise appliances on growing patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 119 (2001) 531-539
37. Waldman B.H. Change in lip contour with maxillary incisor retraction. Angle Orthod 52 (1982) 129-134
38. Hershey H.G. Incisor tooth retraction and subsequent profile change in postadolescent female patients. Am J Orthod 61 (1972) 45-54
39. Talass M.F., Talass L., and Baker R.C. Soft-tissue profile changes resulting from retraction of maxillary incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 91 (1987) 385-394
40. Lo F.D., and Hunter W.S. Changes in nasolabial angle related to maxillary incisor retraction. Am J Orthod 82 (1982) 384-391
41. Nalbantgil D., Arun T., Sayinsu K., and Fulya I. Skeletal, dental and soft-tissue changes induced by the Jasper jumper appliance in late adolescence. Angle Orthod 75 (2005) 426-436
42. Burkhardt D.R., McNamara J.A., and Baccetti T. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 123 (2003) 108-116
43. Pancherz H., and Anehus-Pancherz M. Facial profile changes during and after Herbst appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod 16 (1994) 275-286
44. Herbst E. New ideas and apparatus in orthodontics. Int J Orthod 18 (1932) 962-969
45. Buschang P.H., and Martins J. Childhood and adolescent changes of skeletal relationships. Angle Orthod 68 (1998) 199-206