Modeling stream channel characteristics from drainage-enforced DEMs in Puget Sound, Washington, USA

Journal of the American Water Resources Association

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 414-426

  Davies, Jeremy R ^a   Lagueux, Kerry M ^b   Sanderson, Beth ^a   Beechie, Timothy J ^a  

^a NORTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM   (United States)

Author keywords

Channel morphology; Digital elevation models; Drainage enforcement; Fluvial geomorphology; Geographic information systems; Geospatial analysis; Salmon habitat modeling

Indexed keywords

DRAINAGE; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HYDROLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MORPHOLOGY;

CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS; DRAINAGE ENFORCEMENT; FLUVIAL GEOMORPHOLOGY; GEOSPATIAL ANALYSIS; SALMON HABITAT MODELING;

STREAM FLOW;

DRAINAGE; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HYDROLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MORPHOLOGY; STREAM FLOW;

CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; DIGITAL MAPPING; DRAINAGE BASIN; GIS; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; SALMONID; STREAM CHANNEL; WATER MANAGEMENT;

NORTH AMERICA; PUGET SOUND; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES];

EID: 33947669808     PISSN: 1093474X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00032.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Beechie, T., E. Beamer, and L. Wasserman, 1994. Estimating Coho Salmon Rearing Habitat and Smolt Production Losses in a Large River Basin, and Implications for Restoration. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 14(4):797-811.
2. Beechie, T.J., C.N. Veldhuisen, D.E. Schuett-Hames, P. DeVries, R.H. Conrad, and E.M. Beamer, 2005. Monitoring Treatments to Reduce Sediment and Hydrologic Effects From Roads. In: Methods for Monitoring Stream and Watershed Restoration, P. Roni (Editor). American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 35-65.
3. Beechie, T.J., M. Liermann, M.M. Pollock, S. Baker, and J. Davies, 2006a. Channel pattern and river-floodplain dynamics in forested mountain river systems. Geomorphology 78:124-141.
4. Beechie, T.J., C.M. Greene, L. Holsinger, and E. Beamer, 2006b. Incorporating Parameter Uncertainty Into Evaluations of Spawning Habitat Limitations on Chinook Salmon Populations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60:1242-1250.
5. Burnett, K., 2001. Relationships among Juvenile Anadromous Salmonids, their Freshwater Habitat, and Landscape Characteristics over Multiple Years and Spatial Scales in the Elk River, Oregon. Ph.D. Dissertation. Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.
6. Clarke, S. and K. Burnett, 2003. Comparison of Digital Elevation Models for Aquatic Data Development. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 69(12):1367-1375.
7. Congalton, R.G., R.G. Oderwald, and R.A. Mead, 1983. Assessing Landsat Classification Accuracy Using Discrete Multivariate Statistical Techniques. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 49(12):1670-1678.
8. ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute), 2002. ArcDoc Version 8.3. ESRI Inc., Redlands, California.
9. Gilvear, D., A. Tyler, and C. Davids, 2004. Detection of Estuarine and Tidal River Hydromorphology Using Hyper-Spectral and Lidar Data: Forth Estuary, Scotland. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 61(3):379-392.
10. Hellweger, F. and D. Maidment, , 1997. AGREE - DEM Surface Reconditioning System. http://www.ce.utexas.edu/prof/maidment/gishydro/ferdi/research/agree/ agree.html. Accessed November 12, 2002.
11. Hudson, W.D. and C.W. Ramm, 1987. Correct Formulation of the Kappa Coefficient of Agreement. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 53(4):421-422.
12. Hyatt, T.L, T.Z. Waldo, and T.J. Beechie, 2004. A Watershed Scale Assessment of Riparian Forests, With Implications for Restoration. Restoration Ecology 12(2):175-183.
13. Isaak, D.J., W.A. Hubert, and K.L. Kruger, 1999. Accuracy and Precision of Stream Reach Water Surface Slopes Estimated in the Field and From Maps. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19(1):141-148.
14. Lacey, R.W and R.G. Millar, 2004. Reach Scale Hydraulic Assessment of Instream Salmonid Habitat Restoration. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 40(6):1631-1644.
15. Lamouroux, N. and H. Capra, 2002. Simple Predictions of Instream Habitat Model Outputs for Target Fish Populations. Freshwater Biology 47(8):1543-1556.
16. Landis, J.R. and G.G. Koch, 1977. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics 33(1):159-174.
17. Lazorchak, J.M., D.J. Klemm, and D.V. Peck( Editors), 1998. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program- Surface Waters: Field Operations and Methods for Measuring the Ecological Condition of Wadeable Streams. EPA/620/R-94/004F. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, District of Columbia.
18. Leopold, L.B., M.G. Wolman, and J.P. Miller, 1964. Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, California.
19. Lesica, P. and S. Miles, 2004. Ecological Strategies for Managing Tamarisk on the CM Russell National Wildlife Refuge, Montana, USA. Biological Conservation 119(4):535-543.
20. Lunetta, R.S., B.L. Cosentino, D.R. Montgomery, E.M. Beamer, and T.J. Beechie, 1997. GIS-Based Evaluation of Salmon Habitat in the Pacific Northwest. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 63(10):1219-1229.
21. MacMillan, R.A., T.C. Martin, T.J. Earle, and D.H. McNabb, 2003. Automated Analysis and Classification of Landforms Using High-Resolution Digital Elevation Data: Applications and Issues. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 29(5):592-606.
22. Maidment, D.R., 2002. Archydro: GIS for Water Resources. ESRI Press, Redlands, California.
23. McMaster, K.J., 2002. Effects of Digital Elevation Model Resolution on Derived Stream Network Positions. Water Resources Research 38(4):1-7.
24. Montgomery, D.R., E.M. Beamer, G.R. Pess, and T.P. Quinn, 1999. Channel Type and Salmonid Spawning Distribution and Abundance. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56(3):377-387.
25. Ogden, F.L., J. Garbrecht, P.A. DeBarry, and L.E. Johnson, 2001. GIS and Distributed Watershed Models II: Modules, Interfaces and Models. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 6(6):515-523.
26. Olivera, F. and R. Raina, 2003. Development of Large Scale Gridded River Networks From Vector Stream Data. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 39(5):1235-1248.
27. Pleus, A.E. and D. Schuett-Hames, 1998. TFW Monitoring Program Method Manual for Stream Segment Identification. Prepared for the Washington State Department of Natural Resources Under the Timber, Fish, and Wildlife Agreement. TFW-AM9-98-001. Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission, Olympia, Washington.
28. Reinfelds, I., T. Cohen, P. Batten, and G. Brierley, 2004. Assessment of Downstream Trends in Channel Gradient, Total and Specific Stream Power: a GIS Approach. Geomorphology 60(3-4):403-416.
29. Roni, P., T.J. Beechie, R.E. Bilby, F.E. Leonetti, M.M. Pollock, and G.R. Pess, 2002. A Review of Stream Restoration Techniques and a Hierarchical Strategy for Prioritizing Restoration in Pacific Northwest Watersheds. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22(1):1-20.
30. Sedell, J.R., G.H. Reeves, and K.M. Burnett, 1994. Development and Evaluation of Aquatic Conservation Strategies. Journal of Forestry 92(4):28-31.
31. Soille, P., J. Vogt, and R. Colombo, 2003. Carving and Adaptive Drainage Enforcement of Grid Digital Elevation Models. Water Resources Research 39(12):1366.
32. Steel, E.A. and M. Sheer, 2003. Broad-Scale Habitat Analyses to Estimate Fish Densities for Viability Criteria. Appendix I In Interim Report on Viability Criteria for Willamette and Lower Columbia Basin Pacific Salmonids. Willamette/Lower Columbia Technical Recovery Team Report. National Marine Fisheries Service, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, Washington.
33. Steel, E.A., L. Johnston, B.E. Feist, G. Pess, R.E. Bilby, D. Jensen, T. Beechie, and J. Myers, 2003. Pacific Salmon Recovery Planning and the Salmonid Watershed Analysis Model (SWAM): a Broad-Scale Tool for Assisting in the Development of Habitat Recovery Plans. Endangered Species Update 20(1):1-32.
34. Stewardson, M., 2005. Hydraulic Geometry of Stream Reaches. Journal of Hydrology 306(1-4):97-111.
35. Story, M. and R.G. Congalton, 1986. Accuracy Assessment: a User's Perspective. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 52(3):387-399.
36. Tarboton, D.G., 1997. A New Method for the Determination of Flow Directions and Upslope Areas in Grid Digital Elevation Models. Water Resources Research 33(2):309-319.
37. Tarboton, D.G., 2003. Terrain Analysis Using Digital Elevation Models in Hydrology. In: Conference Proceedings from the 23rd ESRI International Users Conference, San Diego, California, July 7-11.
38. Underwood, J. and R.E. Crystal, 2002. Hydrologically Enhanced, High-Resolution DEMs. Elevation 1:8-14.
39. Western Regional Climate Center, 2004. Western U.S. Climate Historical Summaries. http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/climsum.html. Accessed January 15, 2004.
40. Wilson, J.P., H. Mitasova, and D.J. Wright, 2000. Water Resource Applications of Geographic Information Systems. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 12(2):61-79.
41. Wohl, E. and D. Merritt, 2005. Prediction of Mountain Stream Morphology. Water Resources Research 41(8):10.1029/2004WR003779, 10 p.
42. Zhang, W. and D.R. Montgomery, 1994. Digital Elevation Grid Size, Landscape Representation, and Hydrologic Simulations. Water Resources Research 30(4):1019-1028.