Comparison of Digital Elevation Models for Aquatic Data Development

Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

Volumn 69, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1367-1375

  Clarke, Sharon ^a   Burnett, Kelly ^b  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRAINAGE; GEOLOGICAL SURVEYS; MARINE BIOLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STREAM FLOW;

AQUATIC SYSTEMS; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS (DEMS);

AQUACULTURE;

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; SPATIAL RESOLUTION;

NORTH AMERICA; OREGON; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0344287548     PISSN: 00991112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14358/PERS.69.12.1367     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Band, L.E., 1993. Extraction of channel networks and topographic parameters from digital elevation data, Channel Network Hydrology (K. Beven and M.J. Kirby, editors), John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y., pp. 13-41.
2. Benda, L., and T. Dunne, 1987. Sediment routing by debris flows, Proceedings, Symposium on Erosion and Sedimentation in the Pacific Rim, 03-07 August, Corvallis, Oregon (IAHS Publication 165, International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Wallingford, United Kingdom), pp. 213-223.
3. Brown, D.G., and T.J. Bara, 1994. Recognition and reduction of systematic error in elevation and derivative surfaces from 7.5-minute DEMs, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 60(2): 189-194.
4. Burnett, K.M., 2001. Relationship among Juvenile Salmonids, Their Freshwater Habitat, and Landscape Characteristics over Multiple Years and Spatial Scales in Elk River, Oregon. Ph.D. dissertation, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, 245 p.
5. Carter, J.R., 1992. The effect of data precision on the calculation of slope and aspect using gridded DEMs, Cartographica, 29(1): 22-34.
6. Chang, K., and B. Tsai, 1991. The effect of DEM resolution on slope and aspect mapping, Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 18(1):69-77.
7. CLAMS, 2002. Coastal Landscape Analysis and Modeling Study, Oregon State University Forestry Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon; U.S. Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon; and Oregon Department of Forestry, Salem, Oregon, URL: http://www.fsl.orst.edu/clams (last accessed 08 August 2003).
8. Elsheikh, S., and R. Guercio, 1997. GIS topographical analysis applied to unit hydrograph models: Sensitivity to DEM resolution and threshold area, Proceedings of Rabat Symposium S3: Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems for Design and Operation of Water Resources System, (M.F. Baumgartner, G. A. Schultz, and A.I. Johnson, editors), 23 April-03 May, Rabat, Morrocco (No. 0144-7815(242), International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Wallingford, United Kingdom), pp. 245-253.
9. FEMAT, 1993. Forest Ecosystem Management: An Ecological, Economic, and Social Assessment, Report of the Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; United States Department of the Interior [and others], Portland, Oregon [irregular pagination].
10. FGDC, 2002. Federal Standards for Delineation of Hydrologic Unit Boundaries, Federal Geographic Data Committee, URL: http:// www.ftw.nrcs.usda. gov/HUC/HU_standards_v1_030102.doc (last accessed 08 August 2003).
11. Gao, J., 1997. Resolution and accuracy of terrain representation by grid DEMs at a micro-scale, International Journal Geographical Information Science, 11(2):199-212.
12. Garbrecht, J., and P. Stark, 1995. Note on the use of USGS Level 1 7.5-Minute DEM coverages for landscape drainage analyses, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 61(5):519-522.
13. Guth, P., 1999. Contour line "ghosts" in USGS Level 2 DEMs, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 65(3):289-296.
14. Hutchinson, M.F., and J.C. Gallant, 2000. Digital Elevation Models and Representation of Terrain Shape, Terrain Analysis: Principles And Applications (J.P. Wilson and J.C. Gallant, editors), John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y., pp. 29-50.
15. Isaacson, D.L., and W.J. Ripple, 1990. Comparison of 7.5-minute and 1-degree digital elevation models, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 56(11):1523-1527.
16. Jenson, S.K., 1991. Application of hydrologic information automatically extracted from digital elevation models, Hydrologic Processes, 5(1):31-44.
17. Jenson, S.K., and J.O. Domingue, 1988. Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information system analysis, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 54(11):1593-1600.
18. Lee, D.C., J.R. Sedell, B.E. Rieman, R.F. Thurow, J.E. Williams, D. Burns, J. Clayton, L. Decker, R. Gresswell, R. House, P. Howell, K.M. Lee, K. MacDonald, J. McIntyre, S. McKinney, T. Noel, J.E. O'Connor, C.K. Overton, D. Perkinson, K. Tu, and P. Van Eimeron, 1997. Broadscale Assessment of Aquatic Species and Habitats, as Assessment of Ecosystem Components in the Interior Columbia Basin and Portions of the Klamath and Great Basins: Vol. III (T.M. Quigley and S.J. Arbelbide, editors), PNW-GTR-405, USDA Forest Service and USDI Bureau of Land Management. Portland, Oregon, pp. 1057-1713.
19. Lunetta, R.S., B.L. Cosentino, D.R. Montgomery, E.M. Beamer, and T.J. Beechie, 1997. GIS-based evaluation of salmon habitat for prioritizing restoration opportunities in the Pacific Northwest, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 63(10):1219-1230.
20. McCullaugh, M.J., 1998. Quality, Use and Visualisation in Terrain Modeling, Landform Monitoring, Modeling and Analysis (S.N. Lane, K.S. Richards, and J.H. Chandler, editors), John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y., pp. 95-117.
21. McMaster, K.J., 2002. Effects of digital elevation model resolution on derived stream network positions, Water Resources Research, 38(4):1-7.
22. Monckton, C.G., 1994. An Investigation into the Spatial Structure of Error in Digital Elevation Data, Innovations in GIS (M.F. Worboys, editor), Taylor and Francis, London, United Kingdom, pp. 201-211.
23. Montgomery, D.R., W.E. Dietrich, and K. Sullivan, 1998. The Role of GIS in Watershed Analysis, Landform Monitoring, Modeling and Analysis (S.N. Lane, K.S. Richards, and J.H. Chandler, editors), John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y., pp. 241-261.
24. Montgomery, D.R., E.M. Beamer, G.R. Pess, and T.P. Quinn, 1999. Channel type and salmonid spawning distribution and abundance, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 56:377-387.
25. Moore, I.D., R.B. Grayson, and A.R. Ladson, 1991, Digital terrain modeling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications, Hydrological Processes, 5(1):3-30.
26. Oregon Department of Forestry, 1997. Forest Practice Administrative Rules, OAR 629-635-200, Oregon Department of Forestry, Salem, Oregon,39 p.
27. _, 1999. Western Oregon Debris Flow Hazard Maps: Methodology and Guidance for Map Use, Oregon Department of Forestry, Salem Oregon, URL: http://www.odf.state.or.us/divisions/ administrative-services/services/gis/pdf/ debrismap.pdf (last accessed 08 August 2003).
28. _, 2000. Forest Practice Administrative Rules and Forest Practices Act, OAR 629-600-100, Oregon Department of Forestry, Salem, Oregon, 77 p.
29. Osborn, K., J. List, D. Gesch, J. Crowe, G. Merrill, E. Constance, J. Mauck, C. Lund, V. Caruso, and J. Kosovich, 2001, National Digital Elevation Program (NDEP), Digital Elevation Model Technologies and Applications: The DEM Users Manual (D.F. Maune, editor), American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 83-120.
30. Pater, D.E., S.E. Bryce, T.D. Thorson, J. Kagan, C. Chappell, J.M. Omernik, S.H. Azevedo, and A.J. Woods, 1998. Ecoregions of Western Washington and Oregon, Poster, Department of the Interior, U.S. Geologic Survey, Reston, Virginia.
31. Quinn, P., K. Beven, and O. Planchon, 1991. The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributed hydrological modeling using digital terrain models, Hydrological Processes, 5(1):59-79.
32. Reeves, G.H., D.H. Hohler, D.P. Larsen, D.E. Busch, K. Kratz, K. Reynolds, K.F. Stein, T. Atzet, P. Hays, and M. Tehan, 2003. Aquatic and Riparian Effectiveness Monitoring Plan for the Northwest Forest Plan, General Technical Report, PNAW-GTR-577, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, PNW Research Station, Salem, Oregon, in press.
33. REO, 2002. REO GIS Data Links, Regional Ecosystem Office, Portland, Oregon, URL: http://www.reo.gov/reo/data/reodata.htm (last accessed 08 August 2003).
34. Robinson, G.J., 1994. The accuracy of digital elevation models derived from digitized contour data, Photogrammetric Record, 14(83): 805-814.
35. Shearer, J.W., 1991. The accuracy of digital terrain models, Terrain Modeling in Surveying and Civil Engineering (G. Petrie, and T.J.M. Kennie, editors), McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, N.Y., pp. 315-336.
36. SNEP, 1996. Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress, 1996, Volume I-III, Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project Team, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, University of California, Davis, California, 1002 p.
37. Spies, T.A., G. Reeves, K. Burnett, W. McComb, K. N. Johnson, G. Grant, J. Ohmann, S. Garman, and P. Bettinger, 2002. Assessing the Ecological consequences of forest policies in a multi-ownership province in Oregon, Integrating Landscape Ecology into Natural Resources Management (J. Liu and W. Taylor, editors), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, pp. 179-207.
38. Tarboton, D.G., R.L. Bras, and I. Rodigues-Iturbe, 1991. On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data, Hydrological Processes, 5:81-100.
39. Thieken, A.H., A. Lücke, B. Diekkrüger, and O. Richter, 1999. Scaling input data by GIS for hydrological modeling, Hydrological Processes, 13:611-630.
40. ULEP, 2001. Multi-Resource Exchange Land Allocation Model Handbook, Umpqua Land Exchange Project, Foundation for Voluntary Land Exchanges, Portland, Oregon, 472 p.
41. Underwood, J., and R.E. Crystal, 2002. Hydrologically enhanced, high-resolution DEMs, A Supplement to Geospatial Solutions and GPS World, pp. 8-14.
42. USGS, 1998. National Mapping Program Technical Instructions: Standards for Digital Elevation Models, U.S. Geological Survey National Mapping Division, Reston, Virginia, URL: http:// rmmcweb.cr.usgs.gov/public/nmpstds/demstds.html (last accessed 08 August 2003).
43. Viger, R.J., S.L. Markstrom, and G.H. Leavesley, 1998. The GIS Weasel-An interface for the treatment of spatial information used in watershed modeling and water resource management, Proceedings of the First Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference, 19-23 April, Las Vegas, Nevada, 2(7):73-80, URL: http:// wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/weasel/doc/ffiamc (last accessed 08 August 2003).
44. Walker, J.P., and G.R. Willgoose, 1999. On the effect of digital elevation model accuracy on hydrology and geomorphology, Water Resources Research, 35(7):2259-2268.
45. Walsh, S.J. D.R. Lightfoot, and D.R. Butler, 1987. Recognition and assessment of error in geographic information systems, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 53(10):1423-1430.
46. Wang, X., and Z. Yin, 1998. A comparison of drainage networks derived from digital elevation models at two scales, Journal of Hydrology, 210:221-241.
47. Weih, R.C., and J.L. Smith, 1990. Characteristics and limitations of USGS Digital Elevation Models, Proceedings: Applications of Geographic Information Systems, Simulation Models, and Knowledge-Based Systems for Land Use Management, 12-14 November, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, pp. 139-148.
48. Weibel, R., and M. Heller, 1991. Digital terrain modeling, Geographical Information Systems (D.J. Maguire, M.F. Goodchild, and D.W. Rhind, editors), Longman Harlow,.New York, N.Y., pp. 269-297.
49. Wise, S.M., 1998.,The effect of GIS interpolation errors on the use of digital elevation models in geomorphology, Landform monitoring, modeling and analysis (S.N. Land, K.S. Richards, and J.H: Chandler, editors), John Wiley & Sons Ltd, New York, N.Y., pp. 139-164.
50. Wood J.D., and P.F. Fisher, 1993, Assessing interpolation accuracy in elevation models, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 13(2):48-56.
51. Zhang, W., and D.R. Montgomery, 1994. Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation, and hydrologic simulations, Water Resources Research, 30(4):1019-1028.
52. Zhang, X., N.A. Drake, J. Wainwright, and M. Mulligan, 1999. Comparison of slope estimates from low resolution DEMs: Scaling issues and a fractal method for their solution, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 24:763-779.