Incorporating parameter uncertainty into evaluation of spawning habitat limitations on Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) populations

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Volumn 63, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1242-1250

  Beechie, Timothy J ^a   Greene, Correigh M ^a   Holsinger, Lisa ^a,c   Beamer, Eric M ^b  

^a NORTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b Skagit River System Cooperative   (United States)

^c US Forest Service   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; HABITAT AVAILABILITY; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; POPULATION SIZE; SALMONID; SPAWNING GROUND; SPAWNING POPULATION;

NORTH AMERICA; PUGET SOUND; SUIATTLE RIVER; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES];

ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA;

EID: 33745785870     PISSN: 0706652X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/F06-015     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ayers, H.B. 1899. Washington Forest Reserve. In Nineteenth annual report of the United States Geological Survey, 1897-1898. Part V. Forest reserves. Edited by H. Gannett. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. pp. 283-313.
2. Beechie, T., Beamer, E., and Wasserman, L. 1994. Estimating coho salmon rearing habitat and smolt production losses in a large river basin, and implications for habitat restoration. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 14: 797-811.
3. Beechie, T.J., Collins, B.D., and Pess, G.R. 2001. Holocene and recent geomorphic processes, land use and salmonid habitat in two north Puget Sound river basins. In Geomorphic processes and riverine habitat. Water science and application. Vol. 4. Edited by J.B. Dorava, D.R. Montgomery, F. Fitzpatrick, and B. Palcsak. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C. pp. 37-54.
4. Beechie, T.J., Veldhuisen, C.N., Schuett-Hames, D.E., DeVries, P., Conrad, R.H., and Beamer, E.M. 2005. Monitoring treatments to reduce sediment and hydrologic effects from roads. In Methods for monitoring stream and watershed restoration. Edited by P. Roni. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 194-225.
5. Burner, C.J. 1951. Characteristics of spawning nests of Columbia River salmon. Fish. Bull. Fish Wildl. Serv. 61: 97-110.
6. Chapman, W.M. 1943. The spawning of Chinook salmon in the main Columbia River. Copeia, 1943: 168-170.
7. Chapman, D.W., Weitcamp, D.E., Welsh, T.L., Dell, M.B., and Schadt, T.H. 1986. Effects of river flow on the distribution of Chinook salmon redds. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 115: 537-547.
8. Collins, B.D., Montgomery, D.R., and Sheikh, A.J. 2003. Reconstructing the historic river landscape of the Puget Lowland. In Restoration of Puget Sound Rivers. Edited by D.R. Montgomery, S. Bolton, D.B. Booth, and L. Wall. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Wash. pp. 79-128.
9. Cooney, R.T., and Brodeur, R.D. 1998. Carrying capacity and North Pacific salmon production: stock-enhancement implications. Bull. Mar. Sci. 62: 443-464.
10. Coronado, C., and Hilborn, R. 1998. Spatial and temporal factors affecting survival in coho and fall Chinook salmon in the Pacific Northwest. Bull. Mar. Sci. 62: 409-425.
11. Ebersole, J.L., and Liss, W.J. 1997. Restoration of stream habitats in the western United States: restoration as reexpression of habitat capacity. Environ. Manag. 21: 1-14.
12. Francis, R.I.C.C. 1992. Use of risk analysis to assess fishery management strategies: a case study using orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus) on the Chatham Rise, New Zealand. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49: 922-930.
13. Francis, R.I.C.C., and Shotton, R. 1997. "Risk" in fisheries management: a review. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54: 1699-1715.
14. Fukushima, M., Quinn, T.J., and Smoker, W.W. 1998. Estimation of eggs lost from superimposed pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) redds. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55: 618-625.
15. Gannett, H. 1899. Nineteenth annual report of the United States Geological Survey, 1897-1898. Part V. Forest Reserves. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
16. Geist, D.R., Jones, J., Murray, C.J., and Dauble, D.D. 2000. Suitability criteria analyzed at the spatial scale of redd clusters improved estimates of fall chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) spawning habitat use in the Hanford Reach, Columbia River. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57: 1636-1646.
17. Greene, C.M., and Beechie, T.J. 2004. Habitat-specific population dynamics of ocean-type chinook salmon (Onchorynchus tshawytscha) in Puget Sound. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 61: 590-602.
18. Hahn, P., Kraemer, C., Hendrick, D., Castle, P., and Wood, L. 2001. Washington state Chinook salmon spawning escapement assessment in the Stillaguamish and Skagit Rivers, 1998. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Wash.
19. Hall, D.L., Hilborn, R., Stocker, M., and Walters, C.J. 1988. Alternative harvest strategies for Pacific herring (Clupea harengus pallasi). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45: 888-897.
20. Hanrahan, T.P., Dauble, D.D., and Geist, D.R. 2004. An estimate of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) spawning habitat and redd capacity upstream of a migration barrier in the upper Columbia River. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 61: 23-33.
21. Hare, S.R., Mantua, N.J., and Francis, R.C. 1999. Inverse production regimes: Alaskan and West Coast Pacific salmon. Fisheries, 24(1): 6-14.
22. Healey, M. 1991. Life history of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). In Pacific salmon life histories. Edited by C. Groot and L. Margolis. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, B.C. pp. 176-185.
23. Holsinger, L., and Pess, G.R. 2003. Estimating Chinook spawner capacity of Stillaguamish River. In Ecosystem recovery planning for listed salmon: an integrated assessment approach for salmon habitat. Edited by T.J. Beechie, E.A. Steel, P.R. Roni, and E. Quimby. US Department of Commerce, NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-58. pp. 137-156.
24. Leopold, L.B., Wolman, M.G., and Miller, J.P. 1964. Fluvial processes in geomorphology. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, Calif.
25. Lunetta, R.S., Cosentino, B.L., Montgomery, D.R., Beamer, E.M., and Beechie, T.J. 1997. GIS-based evaluation of salmon habitat in the Pacific Northwest. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 63: 1219-1229.
26. McAllister, M.K., Pikitch, E.K., Punt, A.B., and Hilborn, R. 1994. Bayesian approach to stock assessment and harvest decisions using the sampling/importance resampling algorithm. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51: 2673-2687.
27. McNeil, W.J. 1964. Redd superimposition and egg capacity of pink salmon spawning beds. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 21: 1385-1396.
28. Montgomery, D.R., and Buffington, J.M. 1997. Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 109: 596-611.
29. Montgomery, D.R., Beamer, E.M., Pess, G.R., and Quinn, T.P. 1999. Channel type and salmonid spawning distribution and abundance. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56: 377-387.
30. Moussalli, E., and Hilborn, R. 1986. Optimal stock size and harvest rate in multistage life history models. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 43: 135-141.
31. Myers, R.A., MacKenzie, B.R., Bowen, K.G., and Barrowman, N.J. 2001. What is the carrying capacity for fish in the ocean? A meta-analysis of population dynamics of North Atlantic Cod. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58: 1464-1476.
32. Neilson, J.D., and Banford, C.E. 1983. Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) spawner characteristics in relation to redd physical features. Can. J. Zool. 61: 1524-1531.
33. Nickelson, T.E., and Lawson, P.W. 1998. Population viability of coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch, in Oregon coastal basins: application of a habitat-based life cycle model. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55: 2383-2392.
34. Reeves, G.H., Everest, F., and Nickelson, T. 1989. Identification of physical habitats limiting the production of coho salmon in western Oregon and Washington. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-245.
35. Reeves, G.H., Hall, J.D., Roelofs, T.D., Hickman, T.L., and Baker, C.O. 1991. Rehabilitating and modifying stream habitats. Am. Fish. Soc. Spec. Publ. 19: 519-558.
36. Reiser, D.W., and White, RG. 1988. Effects of two sediment size-classes on survival of steelhead and Chinook salmon eggs. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 8: 432-437.
37. Rosenberg, A.A., and Restrepo, V.R. 1994. Uncertainty and risk evaluation in stock assessment advice for U.S. marine fisheries. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51: 2715-2720
38. Ruckelshaus, M., Currens, K., Graeber, B., Fuerstenberg, B., Rawson, K., Sands, N., and Scott, J. 2006. Independent populations of Chinook salmon in Puget Sound. US Department of Commerce, NOAA Tech. Memo. In press.
39. Seiler, D., Neuhauser, S., and Kiskimoto, L. 2003. 2002 Skagit River wild 0+ Chinook production evaluation annual report. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Rep. FPA 03-11.
40. Steel, E.A., Liermann, M.C., McElhaney, P., Scholtz, N.L., and Cullen, A.C. 2003. Managing uncertainty in habitat recovery planning. In Ecosystem recovery planning for listed salmon: an integrated assessment approach for salmon habitat. Edited by T.J. Beechie, E.A. Steel, P.R. Roni, and E. Quimby. US Department of Commerce, NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-58. pp. 137-156.
41. Vronskiy, B.B. 1972. Reproductive biology of the Kamchatka River Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Walbaum)). J. Ichthyol. 12: 259-273.
42. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and Western Washington Treaty Indian Tribes. 1992. Washington State Salmon and Steelhead Stock Inventory (SASSI). Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Wash.
43. Wilson, P.H. 2003. Using population projection matrices to evaluate recovery strategies for Snake River spring and summer Chinook salmon. Conserv. Biol. 17: 782-794.